Verifier layer: grounding + consistency over the §5 geometry / reasoning ops
The disposes half of the propose->verify loop. Catches the plausible lie a grammar check never sees: fluent, confident, wrong. GROUNDING (anti-hallucination): fit a claim point against every real evidence neighborhood via engram_reason_point_fit; grounded iff best fit clears an absolute threshold. Off-model orthogonal residual is the hallucination signal. Distinct from abduction: asks 'is there any real support at all' and may say no. CONSISTENCY (contradiction): (a) polarity/negation inversion -- claim lands on the opposite side of a real polarity axis from the grounded truth (the reassurance->accusation catch: 'never fought'->'argued'); (b) geometric -- claim inside a forbidden region or beyond a max-distance constraint. Pure C11, read-only, composes existing primitives only. 29 constructed-case checks, 0 failures across PERF and ASan/UBSan; macOS leaks 0. el-exposure deferred (point/variadic-set inputs -- matches reasoning-agent precedent). Reach checks (formal/causal/predictive) not started; documented.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
# Verifier Layer — Grounding + Consistency (decisions + reversal)
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-13
|
||||
**Branch:** `engram-tiered-storage` (worktree `/tmp/engram-tiered-wt`), atop `a3358df`
|
||||
**Scope:** additive, read-only, staged. No push, no tag, no merge. Live `:8742` untouched.
|
||||
|
||||
## What this adds
|
||||
|
||||
The VERIFIER layer — the "disposes" half of the propose→verify loop. The geometry
|
||||
PROPOSES (cheap, creative, sometimes wrong); the verifier DISPOSES, catching the
|
||||
class of failure no grammar check sees: a fluent, confident, WRONG output — the
|
||||
**plausible lie**.
|
||||
|
||||
Motivating failure (tonight's PT translation): a deleted negation turned
|
||||
"you never fought" into "you argued" — reassurance inverted into accusation,
|
||||
grammatical and invisible, catchable only by the geometry.
|
||||
|
||||
Two checks, both pure C11 (stdlib + libm), read-only over their inputs, touching no
|
||||
store / index / activation. Every geometry op is delegated to the already-shipped
|
||||
reasoning + §5 operator primitives; this layer only composes and thresholds.
|
||||
|
||||
### Files added
|
||||
- `lang/runtime/engram_verify.h` — API + design contract.
|
||||
- `lang/runtime/engram_verify.c` — implementation.
|
||||
- `engram/test/test_verify.c` — closed-form constructed cases (29 checks).
|
||||
- `engram/test/run_verify_tests.sh` — two-pass runner (PERF, then ASan/UBSan).
|
||||
|
||||
No existing file was modified.
|
||||
|
||||
## C signatures + how each composes the existing primitives
|
||||
|
||||
### GROUNDING (anti-hallucination)
|
||||
```c
|
||||
int engram_verify_grounding(const float* claim, int dim,
|
||||
const GeoDescriptor* const* evidence, int n_evidence,
|
||||
double ext_floor, double ground_threshold,
|
||||
GeoGrounding* out);
|
||||
```
|
||||
Fits the claim POINT against every real evidence neighborhood via
|
||||
`engram_reason_point_fit` (in-distribution Mahalanobis + off-model orthogonal
|
||||
residual) and keeps the BEST supporter. Grounded iff best fit score ≥
|
||||
`ground_threshold`. Deliberately an ABSOLUTE-THRESHOLD gate, distinct from ABDUCTION
|
||||
(which always ranks and picks a winner): grounding asks the prior question — "is there
|
||||
any real support at all?" — and may answer no. The off-model `best_ortho` residual is
|
||||
the sharpest hallucination signal: energy in a direction the manifold does not span.
|
||||
|
||||
### CONSISTENCY (contradiction detection)
|
||||
```c
|
||||
int engram_verify_consistency(const float* claim, int dim,
|
||||
const GeoDescriptor* context,
|
||||
const GeoDescriptor* pole_pos, const GeoDescriptor* pole_neg,
|
||||
const GeoDescriptor* forbidden,
|
||||
double ext_floor, double deadzone_frac,
|
||||
double forbidden_thresh, double max_distance,
|
||||
GeoConsistency* out);
|
||||
```
|
||||
Two independent sub-checks (either can fire; both flags reported):
|
||||
|
||||
- **(a) POLARITY / negation inversion** — the reassurance→accusation catch.
|
||||
A polarity axis `p = (c_pos − c_neg)/‖·‖` is defined by two REAL poles (affirm vs
|
||||
negate), midpoint `o = ½(c_pos + c_neg)`. Signed sides: `claim_side = p·(claim − o)`,
|
||||
`ref_side = p·(c_context − o)`. If they have OPPOSITE sign and both clear the neutral
|
||||
deadzone (`deadzone_frac·½‖c_pos−c_neg‖`), the claim asserts the polarity opposite to
|
||||
the grounded truth → inversion flagged. Pure dot products / projections over the same
|
||||
centroids the geometry already computes.
|
||||
- **(b) GEOMETRIC contradiction** — claim sits INSIDE a `forbidden` region it must be
|
||||
far from (`engram_reason_point_fit` score ≥ `forbidden_thresh`), OR violates a
|
||||
max-distance constraint to `context` (`L2 > max_distance`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Proof (constructed cases — demonstrate, not declare)
|
||||
|
||||
`./engram/test/run_verify_tests.sh` → **29 checks, 0 failures** in BOTH passes
|
||||
(PERF -O2, and ASan+UBSan -O1). macOS `leaks --atExit`: **0 leaks for 0 total leaked
|
||||
bytes**.
|
||||
|
||||
Key demonstrated numbers:
|
||||
- Grounding IN (claim inside E0): score 0.885, grounded=1, ortho≈0.
|
||||
- Grounding OUT (claim floating along unmodeled e2): score 0.0004, grounded=0,
|
||||
ortho=50.0 (the hallucination signal), nearest centroid L2=50.
|
||||
- **Negation inversion (the catch):** truth "never fought" ref_side=−5.0, lie
|
||||
"you argued" claim_side=+4.0 → opposite poles → `inverted=1`, verdict=POLARITY,
|
||||
consistency=0. Faithful claim (−4.0, same pole) → inverted=0, verdict=OK,
|
||||
consistency=1. Neutral claim inside deadzone → not triggered.
|
||||
- Geometric: claim inside forbidden region → geo_violation=1 (forb_fit 0.99);
|
||||
claim beyond max_distance → geo_violation=1 (ctx_dist 8.0 > 3.0).
|
||||
- **Combined (the whole point):** a claim that is GROUNDED in real vocabulary
|
||||
(grounded=1, score 1.0) yet polarity-inverted is PASSED by grounding and CAUGHT
|
||||
only by consistency (verdict=POLARITY). Grounding alone is insufficient; consistency
|
||||
is the catch.
|
||||
|
||||
## el-exposure — DEFERRED (matches reasoning-agent precedent)
|
||||
|
||||
Not exposed as el builtins this pass. The reasoning agent exposed ONLY `analogy`
|
||||
(three seed-identified neighborhoods → the clean fixed-arity seed-CSV→descriptor JSON
|
||||
pattern) and deferred its point-input / variadic-set modes (abduction, induction,
|
||||
causal, planning). The verifier's grounding (claim POINT + variadic evidence SET) and
|
||||
consistency (claim POINT + context + two poles + forbidden + scalar thresholds) are
|
||||
exactly those shapes: no clean fixed-arity seed-CSV JSON mapping exists, and adding one
|
||||
would require new JSON list-of-lists + point-vector marshaling absent from the codebase,
|
||||
risking an elc rebuild/fold (violates the capped-fold-only rail). A claim is also an
|
||||
arbitrary proposed POINT, not necessarily an existing node — so the point-native C API
|
||||
is the correct primitive. Deferred deliberately; the C layer is complete and proven.
|
||||
|
||||
When exposed later, follow the same additive pass-through pattern used for the geo
|
||||
operators: native `engram_verify_*_json(el_val_t ...)` in `el_runtime.c` (heavy runtime)
|
||||
+ a `__engram_verify_*_json` wrapper in `el_seed.c`, resolving seed CSVs → descriptors
|
||||
and marshaling the claim vector — no fold needed for callability (shipped elc passes
|
||||
unknown-ident builtin calls straight through to the heavy-runtime C symbols).
|
||||
|
||||
## Reach checks (FORMAL / CAUSAL / PREDICTIVE) — NOT STARTED
|
||||
|
||||
Honestly not started this pass; the two tractable-now checks (grounding + consistency)
|
||||
were driven to done-with-proof first as specified.
|
||||
- **CAUSAL** already exists as a REASONING operator (`engram_reason_causal`,
|
||||
intervention/temporal-precedence over the typed causal graph); a verifier wrapper that
|
||||
checks "does the claimed cause actually precede/influence" would compose it — not built.
|
||||
- **FORMAL** (logical consistency of a claim SET) needs an external checker (SMT/proof
|
||||
kernel) — the non-geometric seam; not built.
|
||||
- **PREDICTIVE** (commit a prediction, check vs outcome, restructure on error) is the CGI
|
||||
research frontier; not built.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reversal
|
||||
|
||||
Fully additive. To reverse: delete the four added files
|
||||
(`lang/runtime/engram_verify.{h,c}`, `engram/test/test_verify.c`,
|
||||
`engram/test/run_verify_tests.sh`) or `git revert` this commit. Nothing else references
|
||||
them; no build wiring, no el registration, no store schema, no runtime path was changed.
|
||||
Live `:8742` was never touched.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user