Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bigmerge 45325f7391 singleton: guard the state, not the program's name
El SDK CI - dev / build-and-test (pull_request) Failing after 4m6s
The singleton lock protected a filename, not a store. It was keyed on
$EL_SINGLETON_DIR|$TMPDIR|/tmp + /el-singleton-<program>.lock — the
program's NAME and a temp directory — and never consulted the state it
claimed to protect, while its own refusal message read "Refusing to start
a second instance against the same state."

Measured, it failed in both directions. A second engram against a
DIFFERENT data dir was refused, naming the first's pid. And
TMPDIR=/tmp/other let a second engram start against the SAME data dir
with no complaint — the two-writer data-loss condition the guard exists
to prevent, defeated by one environment variable.

Both are one error: the identity of the resource had been replaced by a
label for it.

The lock now lives inside the state it guards —
<state>/.el-singleton-<id>.lock — and the program block says what that
state is. Same directory is the same file is the same inode, so it
contends and there is no TMPDIR left in the key to change. Different
directories are different files, so they don't. Different spellings of
one directory (trailing slash, x/../x, symlink) collapse in the kernel's
own path walk, so they contend without this code comparing strings;
canonicalisation is for the message, never the decision.

`guards:` is an expression so a program can point at the resolver that
already owns its path — guards: engram_resolve_data_dir() — instead of
restating that resolver's default, which is the two-owners defect spec
18.4 exists to prevent. A `singleton:` without `guards:` is now a compile
error; emitting a name-keyed lock instead would be emitting the defect.

Kept: the flock (the kernel drops it on crash and SIGKILL, so there is
still no "delete the lock file to get unstuck" ritual — a stale file
inside a copied data dir is inert), and the holder's pid in the message.
Changed: the message is true. It says "the same state" because the lock
it failed to take is in that state, and it names the state it checked.
An unguardable state (missing, read-only) now refuses rather than
starting unguarded.

Also corrects lang/AGENTS.md's compiler rebuild line, which had gone
stale: linking el_runtime.c alone no longer resolves.
2026-08-16 16:08:40 -05:00
bigmerge e239f2894c docs: carry the correspondence corrections, because a stale doc builds the wrong thing
The docs described a mind made of subsystems — a grounding subsystem, a wonder
manifest, a dreamer on a beat, faculties as arguments to one call. Each of those
is a supervisor invented for something that should be a property of the
substrate, and two of the documents carrying them are load-bearing for a build
agent: cognitive-architecture.design.md says "a build agent executes from this
doc", and tools/api-reshape/README.md marks the refuted shapes PROVEN on a live
clone.

Corrections carried, per lang/spec/correspondence-and-censorship.md (PR #149)
and lang/spec/runtime-ownership.md:

- Grounding is not a subsystem — it IS the edge weight. grounded-by as a
  relation type should not exist; grounding is a property of a relation, not a
  relation between nodes. Never computed on demand.
- Faculties are operations, not parameters. reason changes the estimate, induce
  changes the parameters, abduce changes the structure — a write, which
  GeoGradient cannot express. A write is not a parameter of a read.
- Wonder is the boundary, not a manifest. Curiosity is wonder crystallized at a
  nucleation site: one thing at two phases. Removed wonder from the operator
  table in AGENTS.md.
- Consolidation is ambient, not scheduled. A brain has no cron job. The presence
  of a ticker is the diagnostic.
- co_registration is deprecated — it averaged a per-edge property into a region
  scalar, so opposing sites cancelled. GeoEdge.discord replaces it. Nothing new
  may read it.
- In an immutable substrate, any mechanism that refuses a write is either
  redundant with immutability or an epistemic constraint misfiled as a
  protective one.

The two design docs are marked superseded-in-part with the refutation at the
point each claim is made, not rewritten. Preserving what was argued down is the
point of an immutable record.

Also measured and corrected while verifying the above: engram/README.md
documented a Rust engram-core crate on sled with "flat cosine scan until scale
demands HNSW" — there is no Rust in engram/ and HNSW is the index; lang/releases/
no longer exists, so both README.md and AGENTS.md pointed at a deleted path for
the authored runtime; language.md listed the engram_* and http_* runtimes as
stubs. Added language.md §20 for geometry-as-a-value, realizers and transduce
(#144), which had landed with no spec coverage.

Documentation only. No .c, .h, or .el file is touched.
2026-08-16 15:49:44 -05:00
bigmerge 8ae163e8e5 lang: give cross-cutting concerns an owner instead of a convention
El's units of encapsulation are the function and the module. Neither can hold
a concern that belongs to the process, so each one had been expressed the only
way it could be -- as a convention: call this at every site. Conventions of
that shape do not hold. Measured here: zero process-identity guards at any
layer, 20 environment variables each with its default written inline at the
read site, 62 persist call sites, 10 per-route auth checks. One absence, four
times.

Step 0 first, because the premise was wrong. El was believed to have no
middleware or effect mechanism. It has one, and it is already load-bearing:
codegen injects engram_boundary_beat at the entry of every @manager/@accessor
fn, decorators take arguments and stack, dharma_emit from a non-@manager fn is
a #error, and the cgi block injects el_cgi_init at the head of main(). So the
correct move was not to invent a mechanism but to generalize the seam that
already existed. The real gap is narrower and is now recorded: the seam is
prologue-only and its callee is a fixed builtin.

Adds a `program` block -- the third program-level declarative block. cgi and
service declare what a program may do; program declares what it is.

  program "engram" {
      singleton: "engram"
      env ENGRAM_BIND: String = ":8742"
      env GUIDE_PORT:  Int    = "8771"
  }

singleton takes an exclusive flock before any user statement runs and refuses a
second start, reporting the holder's pid. It is a lock rather than a pidfile so
the kernel releases it on death including SIGKILL -- no stale state, and so no
"delete the lock file to get unstuck" ritual, which would itself be a
convention. It reports the pid because "already running" is not actionable; a
pid is. That is the direct answer to a stale process surviving a pkill and
going on answering probes.

env entries resolve once at startup -- environment wins, declaration supplies
the fallback -- and validate as a whole, reporting every problem at once rather
than costing one restart per variable. config("X") for an undeclared X is
fatal, because an advisory schema is just another convention. Programs without
a program block are unaffected, so migration is per-program.

Only one keyword is added. `config` and `env` could not become keywords -- both
are real identifiers in the tree -- so the block's fields are read as
identifier token values by its own parse loop and stay usable everywhere else.

The init function is emitted at the block site and called from main() rather
than inlined into main(). The live backend is codegen_streaming, which emits in
source order and cannot hold the entry list alive until main(); this way only a
single bool has to survive.

Also fixes: config() was defined in el_runtime.c but never prototyped in
el_runtime.h, so any el program calling it failed to compile under C99.

Spec: section 18 documents what shipped. Section 9 is corrected -- it claimed
decorators had no structural meaning, which has not been true for some time.
Section 19 designs durability-as-an-epilogue-effect and route authorization
and states plainly why neither is implemented here: both land in files under
concurrent modification, and the prerequisite for both is lifting the seam
from prologue-only to prologue/epilogue.

Self-hosting fixpoint verified byte-identical.
2026-08-16 11:38:28 -05:00
Will Anderson 1ae68962cf restructure: move el compiler content into lang/ 2026-05-05 01:38:51 -05:00