All four questions in the Open section are now answered by measurement rather
than by argument. Concurrency, error handling, parsing, numeric literals, and
the module system.
capabilities.md cited '== lowering to str_eq unless both operand names are in a
hardcoded int-name set' as the paradigm defect. That is wrong: __int_names comes
from type annotations, which is legitimate propagation. The real defect was 35
hardcoded builtin return types one layer down, and mislocating it hid a live
miscompilation of unannotated lets.
geometry-vs-code.md listed concurrency and error handling as open. Both are
answered: ordering is a partial order and coordination is the price of
forgetting; standing is signed, so not-known and known-false are opposite
directions rather than one boolean. Added the fourth proof form (adversarial
exactness) and recorded that form 1 no longer survives as a verdict -- every row
it justified was a basis, not a capability.
Also marked cross-cutting concerns as implemented rather than predicted.
They were written outside git, so the reasoning that produces the design
had no history and no way to be superseded. capabilities.md and
geometry-vs-code.md are both known stale at this commit; they are tracked
as-is so the corrections are visible as movement rather than as a rewrite.
bigmerge