I said prohibition could not move because "a #error has no runtime". That
conflated two separable things: WHEN a violation is detected (build time --
correct, and unchanged) and WHERE the rule and the checker live (the compiler
-- assumed).
A prohibition is a containment relation over the call graph. So codegen now
records what it saw:
sneaky calls raw_sql
allowed calls raw_sql
allowed calls @repository
repository calls prohibits:raw_sql
and tools/check/prohibitions.sh decides, at build time, outside the compiler.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 codegen can emit the call graph it already walks TRUE
P2 the check becomes a query outside the compiler TRUE
P3 all prohibition decisions leave codegen TRUE zero #errors now
P4 violations still caught at build time TRUE exit=1
P5 codegen drops below the 4661 baseline FALSE 4962, +301
P5 is the finding. The TRAVERSAL is irreducible -- you must walk the AST to
find calls, and those ~120 lines do not move no matter who decides. What is not
irreducible is the rule (which names) or the decision (#error). Those left. I
predicted the whole 223 lines would go because I had not separated walking from
adjudicating.
Still compiled, and measured rather than assumed: the capability-tier system
(cap_check_call, is_self_formation_call, is_dharma_call, is_llm_call,
cap_record_violation, emit_cap_violations) is 76 lines of the same shape --
prohibits_WITHIN rather than prohibits_outside, so the checker needs the
opposite polarity to absorb it.
98/98 native, 4/4 prohibition_query.sh, 7/7 seam_binding.sh, fixpoint ok.
bigmerge
c741cfe928