bigmerge
c6ba0677f0
cycles/ one file per Ishikawa -> scientific method -> Six Sigma loop, named
for the DEFECT not the fix, carrying the commit record as written at
the time
findings/ what the cycles produced, cross-cut: live bugs, architecture answers,
and defects in my own measurement
The organising finding is that predictions which came back FALSE produced every
significant result. Eleven of sixty-one failed, and those eleven found: that the
arity table was not drifted but 40% incomplete; that the AST traversal is
irreducible and only rules and judgments move; that guards could refuse through
the seam after all; and that routing el_bin_lookup through the gate did NOT fix
the SIGSEGV, because the fallback strlen was the hazard -- a wrong fix I would
otherwise have shipped as verified.
One cycle was run without committing predictions first and had to be discarded
as rigged. It is kept, in full, as 18-async-half-expressible.md.
3.3 KiB
3.3 KiB
the wrapper was conditional
One Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
Record — 4f7568b
give a construct its after-crossing face, and let constructs compose
§6 records 62 persist-after-mutate sites, 10 auth-per-route, and
index-after-append that failed at 9 of 9 — every one an obligation at a
crossing that decayed into "remember to do this afterwards." An obligation a
human must remember is not an obligation, and the 9-of-9 figure is what that
costs.
@decorator("injects_at_exit", "persist_now")
fn durable() {}
The body moves into a static helper and the visible fn becomes a wrapper, so
EARLY RETURNS pass through the exit injection. Emitting it only before the
fall-through return would have silently missed every early return — the exact
failure class this seam exists to remove. Fns with no exit construct emit
byte-identically to before.
Three independent constructs now compose on one fn, none known to the compiler:
el_val_t mutate(el_val_t k) {
{ el_val_t __g = my_auth(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("authenticate")); if (__g) return __g; }
engram_boundary_beat(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("manager"));
el_val_t __r = __el_body_mutate(k);
persist_now(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("durable"), __r);
return __r;
}
Guard, then entry, then body, then exit. §5.2 asked whether `hold` is one
construct or two; the implementation answers one construct with two faces,
selected by declared kind rather than by two mechanisms.
Verified: existing output byte-identical, compiler self-hosts byte-identically,
early returns pass through the exit, ordering holds under composition. 98/98
native compiler tests pass.
Record — 285166c
EXPERIMENT: emit the wrapper unconditionally, so exit binds at runtime too
ISHIKAWA: why did exit injection still need compile-time knowledge? Because the
body-helper wrapper was only emitted when codegen already knew an exit
construct existed. The wrapper being conditional was the cause, not the wrapper
being necessary.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 exit becomes runtime-bindable TRUE returns 14, bound
after the build
P2 codegen shrinks TRUE 5094 -> 5044
P3 cost 5-15% from a call frame on every fn FALSE 0.37s -> 0.38s, ~3%
P4 fixpoint holds TRUE
Every fn now gets a body helper and a wrapper. It has to be unconditional:
early returns must route through something for an exit construct to observe
them, and codegen cannot know which fns will be bound after the binary exists.
Removed with the machinery: declare_exit, decorator_exit, cg_exit_target,
cg_exit_construct, and the injects_at_exit scanner branch.
Two controls failed and were rewritten rather than repaired --
no-exit-construct-emits-no-wrapper asserted the optimisation this removes, so
it is now inverted. The integration harness gained a seventh assertion: an exit
construct declared after the build replaces the result.
99/99 native, 7/7 integration, fixpoint gen2==gen3.
Record — b40754f
land unconditional wrapper: exit crossings resolve at runtime