Both, at different layers, and the split is the same as everywhere else. The
NUMERAL is convention -- int_to_str was already form 1, because no position
determines that twelve is written 1 then 2 in base ten. The NUMBER is a
position: three things are three things regardless of notation.
But the sharper answer follows from `love = 0`. A bare `3` is a MAGNITUDE WITH
NO AXIS. It is not a position until something gives it a direction, which is
exactly why 3.days needs a calendar and why time_add(t, n, "min") had to carry
its axis as a string.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 numeral = convention, number = position TRUE
P2 a bare literal is dimensionless until context types it TRUE
P3 there is a measurable place where El guesses TRUE
P4 Instant + Int is not caught though Duration + Int is TRUE
P5 the rule catches it TRUE
P6 nothing legitimate in the tree relies on it TRUE
P3/P4 IS THE DEFECT, and it was found by reasoning from the philosophy and then
measured. Duration + Int was refused -- "an Int carries no unit" -- while
let t: Instant = now()
let u: Instant = t + 3
compiled to raw (t + 3) and reported CLEAN. Adding a dimensionless number to a
point is worse than adding it to a displacement: it silently moves the instant
by an unspecified amount. 3 of what? Whatever the representation happens to be,
which is the leak itself. The asymmetry had no justification; the rule was
simply never written.
P6 MATTERED. Two calendar tests looked like Instant + Int:
let later: Instant = i + 1.hour
let later: Instant = base + 15.hours
They are not. `1.hour` lexes to a Duration -- el_duration_from_nanos(1LL *
3600000000000LL) -- and both stay clean. That is the whole answer demonstrated
in one line: t + 3 is refused because 3 has no axis; t + 1.hour is accepted
because .hour supplies one.
104/104 native + 2 new, integration green, fixpoint ok.
bigmerge
c48db6c2a8