Files
el/engram/test/test_vindex_concurrency.c
T
bigmerge e99a4640e2 test: regression harness for the vindex concurrency crash
Promotes the two throwaway sanitizer harnesses used to diagnose the
2026-08-16 soul crash into engram/test/ so the bug cannot silently regress.

The harness has two halves and the PAIR is the point — it is what localises
the defect to concurrency rather than to HNSW logic:

  single      3000 clustered vectors, one thread, ASan+UBSan. The CONTROL.
              Must always be clean. During diagnosis this cleared all 13,820
              real dim-768 vectors from the live store, which DISPROVED an
              inspection-derived hypothesis about an out-of-bounds
              reverse-link write at engram_vindex.c:340.

  concurrent  writer + reader on one shared index, TSan. Currently reports a
              race at engram_vindex.c:195 (visited_reset) reached from both
              vindex_search and vindex_insert, because VIndex still owns its
              visited[]/visit_epoch scratch — so even two concurrent READS
              corrupt each other's traversal.

Verified: half 1 passes, half 2 reproduces the race.

Gated on EXPECT_RACE, default 1, so the concurrent half documents the known
defect without failing the suite today. When the visited set moves to a
per-query checkout pool (hnswlib VisitedListPool style — NOT thread_local,
since http_worker is a thread per connection and a __thread buffer would leak
~55KB per connection), flip EXPECT_RACE=0 and it becomes a real gate.
2026-08-16 11:29:17 -05:00

137 lines
5.7 KiB
C

/* test_vindex_concurrency.c — regression test for the 2026-08-16 soul crash.
*
* WHAT BROKE: the soul daemon crash-looped (5 crashes in ~100s) with SIGSEGV in
* search_layer <- vindex_insert <- eg_vindex_sync, a SIGABRT, and a fault inside
* xzm_realloc's own freelist — i.e. heap corruption. The SIGSEGV address
* 0x65646f4e6d617267 is little-endian ASCII "gramNode": string bytes being
* dereferenced as an Elem vector pointer.
*
* ROOT CAUSE: VIndex owns its traversal scratch (visited[] + visit_epoch), and
* search_layer mutates it via visited_reset(). So the index is unsafe for ANY
* concurrent use — including two concurrent READS. soul.el starts http_serve_async
* (a thread per connection) and then runs awareness_run() on the main thread, which
* reaches the same global index through engram_activate; nothing serialized them.
*
* Neither hnswlib nor FAISS puts the visited set on the index: hnswlib checks one
* out of a VisitedListPool per query, FAISS uses a thread_local VisitedTable.
*
* THIS TEST HAS TWO HALVES, and they must BOTH be run — the pair is what localises
* the bug to concurrency rather than to HNSW logic:
*
* single Insert N clustered vectors on ONE thread and search. Build with ASan.
* This is the CONTROL. It must stay clean. When this passes and `concurrent`
* fails, the defect is concurrency, not an out-of-bounds/logic error in the
* graph code. (On 2026-08-16 this control cleared all 13,820 real dim-768
* store vectors under ASan, which DISPROVED an inspection-derived hypothesis
* about an out-of-bounds reverse-link write at engram_vindex.c:340.)
*
* concurrent One writer thread inserting while a reader thread searches the SAME
* index. Build with TSan. Until the visited set moves off the index struct
* this is EXPECTED TO REPORT A RACE at engram_vindex.c visited_reset —
* that is the bug, reproduced. Once a per-query visited buffer lands
* (see backlog: "Move VIndex visited-set off the index struct"), this must
* become clean, and THAT is the regression this file guards.
*
* Absence of a crash does NOT mean absence of a race — always read the sanitizer
* verdict, never just the exit code.
*
* Build/run: engram/test/run_vindex_concurrency_tests.sh
*/
#include "engram_vindex.h"
#include <pthread.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#define DIM 128
#define NVEC 3000
#define SEED_N 50
static VIndex* g_ix;
static float* g_vecs;
/* Deterministic filler. Real embeddings are strongly correlated, not uniform noise;
* clustering keeps many candidates near-equidistant, which exercises the diversity
* heuristic and the visited set far harder than random vectors do. */
static void fill_vectors(void) {
g_vecs = (float*)malloc((size_t)NVEC * DIM * sizeof(float));
if (!g_vecs) { fprintf(stderr, "OOM\n"); exit(1); }
for (int i = 0; i < NVEC; i++) {
int cluster = i % 8;
for (int d = 0; d < DIM; d++)
g_vecs[(size_t)i * DIM + d] =
(float)(((d + cluster * 7) % 13) / 13.0) +
(float)(((i * 2654435761u + (unsigned)d) % 97) / 9700.0);
}
}
static void* writer_fn(void* arg) {
(void)arg;
for (int i = SEED_N; i < NVEC; i++)
(void)vindex_insert(g_ix, (uint64_t)i, g_vecs + (size_t)i * DIM);
return NULL;
}
static void* reader_fn(void* arg) {
(void)arg;
uint64_t ids[8]; float ds[8];
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++)
(void)vindex_search(g_ix, g_vecs + (size_t)(i % NVEC) * DIM, 8, 0, ids, ds);
return NULL;
}
static int run_single(void) {
printf("[single] inserting %d vectors on one thread (ASan control)\n", NVEC);
g_ix = vindex_create(DIM, 0, 0);
if (!g_ix) { fprintf(stderr, "[single] vindex_create failed\n"); return 1; }
for (int i = 0; i < NVEC; i++) {
if (vindex_insert(g_ix, (uint64_t)i, g_vecs + (size_t)i * DIM) != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "[single] insert %d failed\n", i); return 1;
}
}
if (vindex_size(g_ix) != (size_t)NVEC) {
fprintf(stderr, "[single] size %zu != %d\n", vindex_size(g_ix), NVEC); return 1;
}
uint64_t ids[16]; float ds[16];
for (int q = 0; q < 200; q++) {
int k = vindex_search(g_ix, g_vecs + (size_t)((q * 7) % NVEC) * DIM, 16, 0, ids, ds);
if (k < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "[single] search failed at q=%d\n", q); return 1; }
}
vindex_free(g_ix); g_ix = NULL;
printf("[single] PASS — no memory error (this must ALWAYS pass)\n");
return 0;
}
static int run_concurrent(void) {
printf("[concurrent] 1 writer + 1 reader on ONE shared index (TSan probe)\n");
g_ix = vindex_create(DIM, 0, 0);
if (!g_ix) { fprintf(stderr, "[concurrent] vindex_create failed\n"); return 1; }
for (int i = 0; i < SEED_N; i++)
(void)vindex_insert(g_ix, (uint64_t)i, g_vecs + (size_t)i * DIM);
pthread_t w, r;
if (pthread_create(&w, NULL, writer_fn, NULL) ||
pthread_create(&r, NULL, reader_fn, NULL)) {
fprintf(stderr, "[concurrent] pthread_create failed\n"); return 1;
}
pthread_join(w, NULL);
pthread_join(r, NULL);
vindex_free(g_ix); g_ix = NULL;
printf("[concurrent] completed — CHECK THE SANITIZER VERDICT, not this line.\n");
printf("[concurrent] a clean TSan run here is the actual pass condition.\n");
return 0;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
const char* mode = (argc > 1) ? argv[1] : "single";
fill_vectors();
int rc;
if (!strcmp(mode, "single")) rc = run_single();
else if (!strcmp(mode, "concurrent")) rc = run_concurrent();
else { fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s [single|concurrent]\n", argv[0]); rc = 2; }
free(g_vecs);
return rc;
}