neuron-technologies/gitea
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)

Browse Source 
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.

### Changes

- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:

```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)

// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```

Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
Copilot
2026-04-26 20:18:28 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 55c9b936cb
commit 45b4fffae4
49 changed files with 169 additions and 171 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment.go
+8 -8
View File
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ func ListIssueComments(ctx *context.APIContext) {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)
return
}
if !ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) {
ctx.APIErrorNotFound()
return
}
@@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ func ListRepoIssueComments(ctx *context.APIContext) {
}
var isPull optional.Option[bool]
canReadIssue := ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues)
canReadPull := ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests)
canReadIssue := ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues)
canReadPull := ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests)
if canReadIssue && canReadPull {
isPull = optional.None[bool]()
} else if canReadIssue {
@@ -386,12 +386,12 @@ func CreateIssueComment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
if !ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) {
ctx.APIErrorNotFound()
return
}
if issue.IsLocked && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) && !ctx.Doer.IsAdmin {
if issue.IsLocked && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) && !ctx.Doer.IsAdmin {
ctx.APIError(http.StatusForbidden, errors.New(ctx.Locale.TrString("repo.issues.comment_on_locked")))
return
}
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ func GetIssueComment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
if !ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull) {
ctx.APIErrorNotFound()
return
}
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ func editIssueComment(ctx *context.APIContext, form api.EditIssueCommentOption)
return
}
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
ctx.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ func deleteIssueComment(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
ctx.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
return
} else if !comment.Type.HasContentSupport() {