refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)

The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.

### Changes

- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:

```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)

// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```

Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
Copilot
2026-04-26 20:18:28 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 55c9b936cb
commit 45b4fffae4
49 changed files with 169 additions and 171 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ func EditPullRequest(ctx *context.APIContext) {
return
}
if !issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID) && !ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) {
if !issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID) && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) {
ctx.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
return
}
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ func EditPullRequest(ctx *context.APIContext) {
// Pass one or more user logins to replace the set of assignees on this Issue.
// Send an empty array ([]) to clear all assignees from the Issue.
if ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && (form.Assignees != nil || len(form.Assignee) > 0) {
if ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && (form.Assignees != nil || len(form.Assignee) > 0) {
err = issue_service.UpdateAssignees(ctx, issue, form.Assignee, form.Assignees, ctx.Doer)
if err != nil {
if user_model.IsErrUserNotExist(err) {
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ func EditPullRequest(ctx *context.APIContext) {
}
}
if ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && form.Milestone != 0 &&
if ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && form.Milestone != 0 &&
issue.MilestoneID != form.Milestone {
oldMilestoneID := issue.MilestoneID
issue.MilestoneID = form.Milestone
@@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ func EditPullRequest(ctx *context.APIContext) {
}
}
if ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && form.Labels != nil {
if ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypePullRequests) && form.Labels != nil {
labels, err := issues_model.GetLabelsInRepoByIDs(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, form.Labels)
if err != nil {
ctx.APIErrorInternal(err)