refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded `access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its embedded `Permission`. ### Changes - **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous `access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission access_model.Permission` - **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the named field: ```go // Before ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode) ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull) slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite) // After ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode) ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull) slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite) ``` Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`, `CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged. --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -45,14 +45,14 @@ func NewComment(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
form := web.GetForm(ctx).(*forms.CreateCommentForm)
|
||||
issueType := util.Iif(issue.IsPull, "pulls", "issues")
|
||||
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != issue.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != issue.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
log.Trace("Permission Denied: User %-v not the Poster (ID: %d) and cannot read %s in Repo %-v.\n"+
|
||||
"User in Repo has Permissions: %-+v", ctx.Doer, issue.PosterID, issueType, ctx.Repo.Repository, ctx.Repo.Permission)
|
||||
ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if issue.IsLocked && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) && !ctx.Doer.IsAdmin {
|
||||
if issue.IsLocked && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) && !ctx.Doer.IsAdmin {
|
||||
ctx.JSONError(ctx.Tr("repo.issues.comment_on_locked"))
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ func NewComment(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
// TODO: need further refactoring to the code below
|
||||
|
||||
// Check if doer can change the status of issue (close, reopen).
|
||||
if (ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) || (ctx.IsSigned && issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID))) &&
|
||||
if (ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull) || (ctx.IsSigned && issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID))) &&
|
||||
(form.Status == "reopen" || form.Status == "close") &&
|
||||
!(issue.IsPull && issue.PullRequest.HasMerged) {
|
||||
// Duplication and conflict check should apply to reopen pull request.
|
||||
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ func UpdateCommentContent(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ func DeleteComment(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
ctx.HTTPError(http.StatusForbidden)
|
||||
return
|
||||
} else if !comment.Type.HasContentSupport() {
|
||||
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ func ChangeCommentReaction(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
if !ctx.IsSigned || (ctx.Doer.ID != comment.PosterID && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(comment.Issue.IsPull)) {
|
||||
if log.IsTrace() {
|
||||
if ctx.IsSigned {
|
||||
issueType := "issues"
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user