refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded `access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its embedded `Permission`. ### Changes - **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous `access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission access_model.Permission` - **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the named field: ```go // Before ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode) ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull) slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite) // After ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode) ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull) slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite) ``` Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`, `CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged. --------- Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@ func ViewIssue(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
ctx.Data["NewIssueChooseTemplate"] = issue_service.HasTemplatesOrContactLinks(ctx.Repo.Repository, ctx.Repo.GitRepo)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsProjectsEnabled"] = ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypeProjects)
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsProjectsEnabled"] = ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypeProjects)
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsAttachmentEnabled"] = setting.Attachment.Enabled
|
||||
upload.AddUploadContext(ctx, "comment")
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -400,9 +400,9 @@ func ViewIssue(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
ctx.Data["Reference"] = issue.Ref
|
||||
ctx.Data["SignInLink"] = middleware.RedirectLinkUserLogin(ctx.Req)
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsIssuePoster"] = ctx.IsSigned && issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasProjectsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeProjects)
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsRepoAdmin"] = ctx.IsSigned && (ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() || ctx.Doer.IsAdmin)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasProjectsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeProjects)
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsRepoAdmin"] = ctx.IsSigned && (ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() || ctx.Doer.IsAdmin)
|
||||
ctx.Data["LockReasons"] = setting.Repository.Issue.LockReasons
|
||||
ctx.Data["RefEndName"] = git.RefName(issue.Ref).ShortName()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -446,14 +446,14 @@ func ViewPullMergeBox(ctx *context.Context) {
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: it should use a dedicated struct to render the pull merge box, to make sure all data is prepared correctly
|
||||
ctx.Data["IsIssuePoster"] = ctx.IsSigned && issue.IsPoster(ctx.Doer.ID)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)
|
||||
ctx.Data["HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission"] = ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWriteIssuesOrPulls(issue.IsPull)
|
||||
ctx.HTML(http.StatusOK, tplPullMergeBox)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func prepareIssueViewSidebarDependency(ctx *context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue) {
|
||||
if issue.IsPull && !ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues) {
|
||||
if issue.IsPull && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypeIssues) {
|
||||
ctx.Data["IssueDependencySearchType"] = "pulls"
|
||||
} else if !issue.IsPull && !ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests) {
|
||||
} else if !issue.IsPull && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypePullRequests) {
|
||||
ctx.Data["IssueDependencySearchType"] = "issues"
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ctx.Data["IssueDependencySearchType"] = "all"
|
||||
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ func prepareIssueViewCommentsAndSidebarParticipants(ctx *context.Context, issue
|
||||
ctx.ServerError("LoadCommentPushCommits", err)
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypeActions) {
|
||||
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypeActions) {
|
||||
for _, commit := range comment.Commits {
|
||||
if commit.Status == nil {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ func (prInfo *pullRequestViewInfo) prepareMergeBox(ctx *context.Context, issue *
|
||||
// Otherwise, there is nothing to do, because the PR view page already contains enough information.
|
||||
data.ShowMergeBox = !pull.HasMerged || data.isPullBranchDeletable
|
||||
|
||||
isRepoAdmin := ctx.IsSigned && (ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() || ctx.Doer.IsAdmin)
|
||||
isRepoAdmin := ctx.IsSigned && (ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() || ctx.Doer.IsAdmin)
|
||||
|
||||
// admin can merge without checks, writer can merge when checks succeed
|
||||
// admin and writer both can make an auto merge schedule (not affected by overridable blockers)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user