refactor: use named Permission field in Repository struct instead of anonymous embedding (#37441)

The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.

### Changes

- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:

```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)

// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```

Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.

---------

Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
This commit is contained in:
Copilot
2026-04-26 20:18:28 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent 55c9b936cb
commit 45b4fffae4
49 changed files with 169 additions and 171 deletions
+5 -5
View File
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ func MustEnableRepoProjects(ctx *context.Context) {
if ctx.Repo.Repository != nil {
projectsUnit := ctx.Repo.Repository.MustGetUnit(ctx, unit.TypeProjects)
if !ctx.Repo.CanRead(unit.TypeProjects) || !projectsUnit.ProjectsConfig().IsProjectsAllowed(repo_model.ProjectsModeRepo) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanRead(unit.TypeProjects) || !projectsUnit.ProjectsConfig().IsProjectsAllowed(repo_model.ProjectsModeRepo) {
ctx.NotFound(nil)
return
}
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ func DeleteProjectColumn(ctx *context.Context) {
return
}
if !ctx.Repo.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, map[string]string{
"message": "Only authorized users are allowed to perform this action.",
})
@@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ func DeleteProjectColumn(ctx *context.Context) {
// AddColumnToProjectPost allows a new column to be added to a project.
func AddColumnToProjectPost(ctx *context.Context) {
form := web.GetForm(ctx).(*forms.EditProjectColumnForm)
if !ctx.Repo.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, map[string]string{
"message": "Only authorized users are allowed to perform this action.",
})
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ func checkProjectColumnChangePermissions(ctx *context.Context) (*project_model.P
return nil, nil
}
if !ctx.Repo.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, map[string]string{
"message": "Only authorized users are allowed to perform this action.",
})
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ func MoveIssues(ctx *context.Context) {
return
}
if !ctx.Repo.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
if !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsOwner() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin() && !ctx.Repo.Permission.CanAccess(perm.AccessModeWrite, unit.TypeProjects) {
ctx.JSON(http.StatusForbidden, map[string]string{
"message": "Only authorized users are allowed to perform this action.",
})