Almost done
`pull_merge_box.tmpl` only has about 80 lines now, and (almost) all
variable accesses are strictly typed.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.
### Changes
- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:
```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)
// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```
Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Refactor preparePullViewPullInfo and related functions, split them into
small ones:
* preparePullViewPullInfo creates PullRequestViewInfo struct
* if the PR is merged: prepareView**Merged**PullInfo
* if the PR is open: prepareView**Open**PullInfo
In prepareViewMergedPullInfo and preparePullViewFillInfo: call
preparePullView**FillInfo** consistnently
preparePullViewFillInfo calls preparePullViewFill**CompareInfo** and
preparePullViewFill**CommitStatusInfo**
1. Fix the "flash message" layout problem for different cases
* I am sure most of the users should have ever seen the ugly
center-aligned error message with multiple lines.
2. Fix inconsistent "Details" flash message EOL handling, sometimes
`\n`, sometimes `<br>`
* Now, always use "\n" and use `<pre>` to render
3. Remove SanitizeHTML template func because it is not useful and can be
easily abused.
* But it is still kept for mail templates, for example:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/36049
4. Clarify PostProcessCommitMessage's behavior and add FIXME comment
By the way: cleaned up some devtest pages, move embedded style block to
CSS file
Use shared repo permission resolution for Actions task users in issue
label remove and clear paths, and add a regression test for deleting
issue labels with a Gitea Actions token.
This fixes issue label deletion when the request is authenticated with a
Gitea Actions token.
Fixes#37011
The bug was that the delete path re-resolved repository permissions
using the normal user permission helper, which does not handle Actions
task users. As a result, `DELETE
/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id}` could return
`500` for Actions tokens even though label listing and label addition
worked.
---------
Co-authored-by: Codex <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
The `PATCH /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}` endpoint silently ignores pull
request config fields (like `default_delete_branch_after_merge`,
`allow_squash_merge`, etc.) unless `has_pull_requests: true` is also
included in the request body. This is because the entire PR unit config
block was gated behind `if opts.HasPullRequests != nil`.
This PR restructures the logic so that PR config options are applied
whenever the pull request unit already exists on the repo, without
requiring `has_pull_requests` to be explicitly set. A new unit is only
created when `has_pull_requests: true` is explicitly sent.
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/36466
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Maybe fix#32018
- Use `gitrepo.GetMergeBase` method instead of other two
implementations.
- Add `FetchRemoteCommit` so that we don't need to add many `remote` to
the git repository to avoid possible git lock conflicts. A lock will
start when invoke the function, it will be invoked when cross-repository
comparing. The head repository will fetch the base repository's base
commit id. In most situations, it should lock the fork repositories so
that it should not become a bottleneck.
- Improve `GetCompareInfo` to remove unnecessarily adding remote.
- Remove unnecessary parameters of `SignMerge`.
Fix#35998
1. Fix `<a rel>` :
* "_blank" already means "noopener"
* "noreferrer" is already provided by page's `<meta name="referrer">`
2. Fix "redirect_to" mechisam
* Use "referer" header to determine the redirect link for a successful
login
3. Simplify code and merge duplicate logic
This PR adds a quick approve button on PR page to allow reviewers to
approve all pending checks. Only users with write permission to the
Actions unit can approve.
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Close#34511Close#34590
Add comment ID to the footnote item's id attribute to ensure uniqueness.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Extract from #34531
## Move Commit status state to a standalone package
Move the state from `structs` to `commitstatus` package. It also
introduce `CommitStatusStates` so that the combine function could be
used from UI and API logic.
## Combined commit status Changed
This PR will follow Github's combined commit status. Before this PR,
every commit status could be a combined one.
According to
https://docs.github.com/en/rest/commits/statuses?apiVersion=2022-11-28#get-the-combined-status-for-a-specific-reference
> Additionally, a combined state is returned. The state is one of:
> failure if any of the contexts report as error or failure
> pending if there are no statuses or a context is pending
> success if the latest status for all contexts is success
This PR will follow that rule and remove the `NoBetterThan` logic. This
also fixes the inconsistent between UI and API. In the API convert
package, it has implemented this which is different from the UI. It also
fixed the missing `URL` and `CommitURL` in the API.
## `CalcCommitStatus` return nil if there is no commit statuses
The behavior of `CalcCommitStatus` is changed. If the parameter commit
statuses is empty, it will return nil. The reference places should check
the returned value themselves.
`[repository.pull-request] DELAY_CHECK_FOR_INACTIVE_DAYS` is a new
setting to delay the mergeable check for pull requests that have been
inactive for the specified number of days.
This avoids potentially long delays for big repositories with many pull
requests. and reduces system load overall when there are many
repositories or pull requests.
When viewing the PR, checking will start immediately and the PR merge
box will automatically reload when complete. Accessing the PR through
the API will also start checking immediately.
The default value of `7` provides a balance between system load, and
keeping behavior similar to what it was before both for users and API
access. With `0` all conflict checking will be delayed, while `-1`
always checks immediately to restore the previous behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Noticed a SQL in gitea.com has a bigger load. It seems both `is_pull`
and `pin_order` are not indexed columns in the database.
```SQL
SELECT `id`, `repo_id`, `index`, `poster_id`, `original_author`, `original_author_id`, `name`, `content`, `content_version`, `milestone_id`, `priority`, `is_closed`, `is_pull`, `num_comments`, `ref`, `pin_order`, `deadline_unix`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix`, `closed_unix`, `is_locked`, `time_estimate` FROM `issue` WHERE (repo_id =?) AND (is_pull = 0) AND (pin_order > 0) ORDER BY pin_order
```
I came across a comment
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24406#issuecomment-1527747296
from @delvh , which presents a more reasonable approach. Based on this,
this PR will migrate all issue and pull request pin data from the
`issue` table to the `issue_pin` table. This change benefits larger
Gitea instances by improving scalability and performance.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
In history (from some legacy frameworks), both `:name` and `name` are
supported as path path name, `:name` is an alias to `name`.
To make code consistent, now we should only use `name` but not `:name`.
Also added panic check in related functions to make sure the name won't
be abused in case some downstreams still use them.
This PR removes (almost) all path tricks, and introduces "renderhelper"
package.
Now we can clearly see the rendering behaviors for comment/file/wiki,
more details are in "renderhelper" tests.
Fix#31411 , fix#18592, fix#25632 and maybe more problems. (ps: fix
#32608 by the way)
wxiaoguang