v1.0 - launch: full nav on gallery, chat widget auto-open, comparison logos, checkout fixes

This commit is contained in:
Will Anderson
2026-05-01 18:13:06 -05:00
parent ff1f9577db
commit 00f2323c98
41 changed files with 4740 additions and 434 deletions
+11 -7
View File
@@ -30,18 +30,15 @@ fn mission() -> String {
</div>
<div class=\"mission-bigtech reveal\" style=\"transition-delay:600ms\">
<p class=\"mission-bigtech-label\">Why I stopped trying to partner with Big Tech</p>
<p class=\"mission-bigtech-label\">Why I built this on my own</p>
<p>
I didn&#39;t just approach one of the largest technology companies in the world - I got the meeting. Got the NDAs signed. Created deliverables in real time. Showed them industry benchmarks with full auditability. Some of their own people could see exactly what it meant - what I had built and what it could do.
I didn&#39;t just approach one of the largest technology companies in the world - I got the meeting. Got the NDAs signed. Created deliverables in real time. Showed them benchmarks with full auditability. Some of their own people understood immediately what it meant.
</p>
<p>
They saw it. Seemed to engage meaningfully. Then, within two days, lawyers were engaged. Their stated concern: defending against me accusing them of stealing my IP. I laughed to myself - <em>wait, are they going to steal my IP?</em> - and decided to just finish the project on my own.
They saw it. Seemed to engage meaningfully. Then, within two days, lawyers were involved. I decided to just finish the project on my own.
</p>
<p class=\"muted\">
By the way: everything you see here, and more, is protected by six patents - and more are coming. They know about the patents. Are they going to try?
</p>
<p class=\"muted\">
Not: how do we solve this at scale? Not: what does this mean for the people we serve? Their instinct was to protect enterprise revenue and manage legal exposure. The actual human impact of their technology - the people whose lives those enterprises touch - didn&#39;t enter the conversation.
Not: how do we solve this at scale? Not: what does this mean for the people we serve? Their instinct was to protect enterprise revenue and manage legal exposure. The actual human impact - the people whose lives those enterprises touch - didn&#39;t enter the conversation.
</p>
<p class=\"muted\">
That&#39;s the difference. <strong style=\"color:var(--t1)\">They&#39;re optimizing for the enterprise. I&#39;m building for the people those enterprises are supposed to serve.</strong>
@@ -80,6 +77,13 @@ fn mission() -> String {
<div class=\"mission-closer reveal\">
<p>The industry built tools to make AI easier to use. <span>I&#39;m building tools to make it safer to trust.</span></p>
</div>
<div class=\"reveal\" style=\"max-width:44rem;margin-top:3.5rem;padding:2rem 2.5rem;border-left:3px solid rgba(0,82,160,.30);background:rgba(0,82,160,.02)\">
<p style=\"font-family:var(--body);font-weight:500;font-size:1rem;color:var(--t1);margin-bottom:1rem\">Nobody&#39;s perfect.</p>
<p style=\"font-family:var(--body);font-weight:300;font-size:0.9375rem;color:var(--t2);line-height:1.8;margin-bottom:1rem\">Neuron isn&#39;t either. There is a gap between what the AI industry is delivering and what the world actually needs. Bridging that gap is the work - not a one-time product release, but continuous work, done in the open, built on the trust that users place in it.</p>
<p style=\"font-family:var(--body);font-weight:400;font-size:0.9375rem;color:var(--navy);line-height:1.6\">That&#39;s my commitment. To keep working. To be honest about the problems. To build something that earns trust by doing the hard things right.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>