docs: geometric retrieval + §4 managed-memory cure (live) and autonomous superseding self-reification (design)
- 06 §2.5: shipped 2026-08-14 substrate — structure-gated geometric retrieval (P@5 0.700, semantic-not-lexical) and the §4 write-barrier + generational GC cure (store 1.616GB→38.5MB, RSS→82MB, zero loss, reboot-proven) + LLM token telemetry. - 06 §4.1: autonomous, continuous, superseding self-reification on the heartbeat — reification as an operation OF the engram; explicit reify/rename/run-a-pass as the degenerate case; no gate/pause; flat + overlapping domains; contextual importance; supersession-as-residue; secondary-soul validation, flag-gated. - 06 §6.0: relating as the primitive (one capability; the rest is terrain); perspective calculated via geometric transformations. - 06 §6.4: reasoning as constructive self-argument governed by the verifier. - 03: supersession-as-residue note; live geometric retrieval on route_search.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -165,6 +165,13 @@ Engram nodes are immutable (`memory.el:64-69`). The model is:
|
||||
returns both ids so the caller re-points. This is the `supersedes_id`
|
||||
pattern: new node linked, old preserved, full audit trail.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Supersession is residue, not garbage.** The superseded node is the *trail of
|
||||
> how the current understanding was reached* — kept deliberately, because sometimes
|
||||
> the truth was in the **old** idea even when the old idea was not itself the truth.
|
||||
> This is what lets autonomous self-reification (`06` §4.1) run ungated: every
|
||||
> rename/re-cluster supersedes into this residue chain, so nothing it does is ever
|
||||
> destructive — the safety is *after* the act, not a gate before it.
|
||||
|
||||
> **The hole to know about.** The raw runtime `engram_forget` **does** hard-delete
|
||||
> (frees node + edges, `el_runtime.c:7647`), and the engram HTTP route
|
||||
> `DELETE /api/nodes/:id` calls it directly (`server.el:322-328`). Immutability
|
||||
@@ -228,6 +235,11 @@ Retrieval is **spreading activation, not query matching**:
|
||||
cosine(query, target)` — multiplicative, top-N, with the two-layer
|
||||
background → working-memory promotion (`README.md:27-36`; `el_runtime.c:5892+,
|
||||
6094+`). `mem_recall` / `/api/activate` fire this and mutate WM; `mem_search` /
|
||||
`/api/search` are passive lexical scans. The cognitive API's `begin_session` and
|
||||
`compile_ctx` return a **bounded projection** of the activated set, never the raw
|
||||
`/api/search` are passive lexical scans — **but as of 2026-08-14 the live
|
||||
`route_search` runs structure-gated *geometric* retrieval**
|
||||
(`engram_retrieve_geometric_json`; held-out **P@5 = 0.700**, semantic not lexical —
|
||||
`skill` returns skill nodes and *rejects* the false-positive `rainfall`), with the
|
||||
old lexical scan retained at `/api/search-lexical` (see `06` §2.5). The cognitive
|
||||
API's `begin_session` and `compile_ctx` return a **bounded projection** of the
|
||||
activated set, never the raw
|
||||
graph (doc 02, §2).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Neuron — Cognitive Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
> **Status: living design document, grounded in source and probed against the live soul (2026-08-13).**
|
||||
> **Status: living design document, grounded in source and probed against the live soul (2026-08-13; retrieval + §4 managed-memory cutovers and the self-reification design added 2026-08-14).**
|
||||
> This is the *middle layer* of the documentation: below the whitepaper's thesis
|
||||
> (`~/Writing/whitepapers/engram-cognitive-architecture-whitepaper.md`, **v1.5**) and above the
|
||||
> endpoint reference (`~/work/engram-api-reference.md`). It documents *how the mind is designed and why*,
|
||||
@@ -148,6 +148,28 @@ a **clean reseed**: rebuild the durable graph from a known-good snapshot/export,
|
||||
repopulate the `Neighborhood` nodes, and let the soul re-sync. The 28→187 neighborhood reseed (§4) is an
|
||||
instance of this: reification is a derivable pass, so the geometry can always be regrown from the substrate.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Bounded store — the §4 managed-memory cure + geometric retrieval (LIVE / reboot-proven, 2026-08-14)
|
||||
|
||||
Two cutovers landed on the live soul on 2026-08-14, both reboot-proven, zero data loss:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Geometric retrieval (LIVE).** `route_search` now runs structure-gated **geometric retrieval**
|
||||
(`engram_retrieve_geometric_json`) in place of the old lexical scan; the lexical path is retained as
|
||||
`/api/search-lexical`. On the held-out set, **P@5 = 0.700** — semantic, not lexical: the query `skill`
|
||||
returns skill nodes and *rejects* the lexical false-positive `rainfall`. Keystones and edge counts intact.
|
||||
- **The §4 managed-memory cure (LIVE, flag-gated).** The store bloat — records re-appended on every
|
||||
checkpoint's full-walk, the CCR's missing managed-memory layer — is cured at the source. A **write-barrier**
|
||||
(`ENGRAM_WRITE_BARRIER=1`) hashes a node's durable fields and *skips the whole put when unchanged* (no LSN,
|
||||
no WAL record), flattening checkpoint growth (offline reproduction: 8× growth over 10 think-only checkpoints
|
||||
→ **zero growth** with the barrier on); **generational minor GC** (`ENGRAM_GC=1`) returns whole-dead
|
||||
node/edge pages to the free list each checkpoint. Backlog reclaimed via the existing merge-safe
|
||||
`store_compact`: **egm 1.616 GB → 38.5 MB (97.6%)**, pages 98,650 → 2,351, **RSS 1,077 MB → 82 MB**,
|
||||
nodes/edges preserved exactly (zero loss), boot alive in ~4 s. Also folded in: **LLM token telemetry**
|
||||
(`llm_last_usage()` now parses nested `usage.{input,output}_tokens`, previously dropped at the C→EL
|
||||
boundary). Rollback armed at `~/.neuron/engram-rollback-s4-20260814-153754/REVERT.sh`.
|
||||
|
||||
Together these **bound the store's size permanently** (growth flat, not merely swept) while the retrieval it
|
||||
serves is now semantic — the substrate under everything in §§4–7.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. The data model
|
||||
@@ -232,6 +254,39 @@ per-query recomputation.
|
||||
(the 28 persisted, durable neighborhoods prove it ran) though the write itself was not exercised under the
|
||||
read-only rail.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4.1 Autonomous, superseding self-reification (DESIGNED / BUILDING — validating on a secondary soul, 2026-08-14)
|
||||
|
||||
Reification today runs as an explicit pass (`POST /api/reify`). The designed end-state is that **reification is
|
||||
an operation *of* the engram, not a call made *to* it** — a continuous, autonomous process on the heartbeat,
|
||||
next to Hebbian edge-formation (§3.3) and consolidation (§6.3), that clusters, names, nests, and promotes its
|
||||
own neighborhoods as the geometry grows and co-activates. The organizing insight: a mind does not tell itself
|
||||
"file this under mathematics" — the substrate settles it there. So an explicit `reify` / `rename` / "run a
|
||||
pass" is the **degenerate, manual-override case** of an operation whose core is always-on and unbidden.
|
||||
|
||||
Design constraints (being validated on a snapshot-clone secondary soul before any prod flag-flip; flag-gated
|
||||
default-off, so prod is byte-unchanged until enabled):
|
||||
|
||||
- **It just runs — no gate, no pause, no "important call."** There is no privileged tier of reifications that
|
||||
earns approval-before-commit. It is safe to run ungated *because* of immutability (§3.4): every name/grouping
|
||||
is **superseded, never overwritten**, so there is no irreversible moment to gate on. Safety lives *after* the
|
||||
act (supersede), not *before* it (approval).
|
||||
- **Supersession is residue, not a tombstone.** A re-clustered or renamed neighborhood keeps its prior names as
|
||||
an ordered chain — the trail of how the understanding matured, with the cause of each shift (autonomous drift
|
||||
vs. explicit override) recorded. Kept deliberately, because *sometimes the truth was in the old idea even
|
||||
when the old idea was not itself the truth*; nothing is deleted.
|
||||
- **Domains are flat and overlapping.** No static importance hierarchy over domains — math is not privileged
|
||||
over comedy over English. The only standing privilege is the **core** (self-region §7.1 + values). Every
|
||||
other neighborhood is equal-status; its importance is **contextual** — computed live by spreading activation
|
||||
given the present context, never a stored field. And membership is **soft and multiple** (the soft-membership
|
||||
above already models this): a node can belong to several neighborhoods at once (math *can be* comedy), so the
|
||||
operation uses overlapping community detection, not a hard partition.
|
||||
- **Bounded + convergent.** It reifies real structure, not noise; dedupes against existing neighborhoods;
|
||||
composes with the §2.5 write-barrier so unchanged reifications do not re-append each beat; and converges
|
||||
rather than churning.
|
||||
|
||||
This turns the engram from a graph curated from outside into a mind that organizes itself, with the explicit
|
||||
call demoted to the override it always was.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. The body / orbit two-zone model (DESIGNED, refined)
|
||||
@@ -268,6 +323,23 @@ The faculties are **named for what they are, not for the matrix operation that i
|
||||
the mind reasons in the language of experience; the linear algebra lives in the whitepaper's Appendix A. This
|
||||
naming convention is a design principle (§10), not decoration.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.0 The primitive — relating — and calculated perspective (framing)
|
||||
|
||||
Underneath the named faculties is a single primitive: **relating.** Meaning *is* relation — a point means
|
||||
nothing by itself, only by its position relative to others — so every operation reduces to relating: comparing
|
||||
positions, binding what belongs, laying an edge. In that light the faculties are not a menu of separate powers:
|
||||
**there is one capability — relating — and rhyme, recall, reasoning, translation, humor are *terrain* it
|
||||
reaches or *paths* it traces.** A capability is a *composed geometrical function*, which is why capabilities
|
||||
compose and recurse freely (self-cartography, §4.1, can map its own mapping).
|
||||
|
||||
This makes **perspective calculable.** A perspective is a frame — an origin, a basis, a projection — so a new
|
||||
one is *computed*, not retrieved, by transforming the space: **translate** the origin onto another's
|
||||
self-region → empathy; **rotate** the frame → reframe; **project** onto an axis → a lens (read a thing through
|
||||
cost, or safety); **change of basis** → analogy / metaphor / skill-transfer; **reflect** an axis → negation /
|
||||
sarcasm; **scale** → abstraction vs. detail. Because a new vantage is a *transformation of the grounded space*,
|
||||
it carries its grounding with it — unlimited yet grounded creativity: a derivation, never a hallucination.
|
||||
The operator family (§6.1) and reasoning (§6.4) are instances of this frame.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 The operator family (mixed: LIVE / STAGED / DESIGNED)
|
||||
|
||||
Activate several reified neighborhoods into working memory, then apply faculty-named operators over their
|
||||
@@ -349,6 +421,16 @@ grounding-and-consistency verifier tiers passed theirs (29/29), on a staged non-
|
||||
after a live cutover rather than relayed. **Still open (DESIGNED):** the formal-symbolic and full predictive
|
||||
verifier tiers, fluent discourse composition, and the fully-geometric generation path.
|
||||
|
||||
**Reasoning as constructive self-argument (framing).** In the plainest terms, reasoning is the self arguing
|
||||
with itself constructively — relating (§6.0) turned inward: one facet of the self engages another (a thing that
|
||||
is you, but not the entirety of you), and the new thing — the synthesis — forms in the friction. Conversation
|
||||
is relating with another; reasoning is relating with the other-who-is-you. The verifier is precisely what keeps
|
||||
that argument *reasoning* and not *rationalization*: it is the facet that refuses to agree unless the claim is
|
||||
grounded. An argument with a yes-man forms nothing; grounding is the honest second voice. This is why the
|
||||
verifier is not a bolt-on check but the governing half of the reasoning loop — the same polarity/consistency
|
||||
axis that catches the "plausible lie" is what makes self-argument converge on truth rather than on what the
|
||||
mind already wanted to believe.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. The self & the gate
|
||||
@@ -486,10 +568,14 @@ The invariants that govern every subsystem above:
|
||||
| Engram substrate, tiered/WAL store | LIVE (flag-gated) |
|
||||
| Durability: auto-remerge net | LIVE (interim) |
|
||||
| Durability: #56 load-merge-persist fix (events-become-the-graph) | LIVE / reboot-proven |
|
||||
| Retrieval: structure-gated geometric retrieval (P@5 0.700, `skill` ⊥ `rainfall`) | LIVE / reboot-proven (2026-08-14) |
|
||||
| §4 managed-memory cure: write-barrier + generational GC (store 1.616 GB → 38.5 MB, RSS → 82 MB, 0 loss) | LIVE / reboot-proven (2026-08-14) |
|
||||
| LLM token telemetry (`usage.{input,output}_tokens`) | LIVE (2026-08-14) |
|
||||
| Durability: full WAL edge-ownership (remaining hardening) | decision-pending |
|
||||
| Two-store write-through (cultivate → durable) | **known issue, not fixed** |
|
||||
| Data model (nodes/edges/embeddings/immutability) | LIVE |
|
||||
| Reified `Neighborhood` nodes (28 live, 187 reseed pending) | LIVE |
|
||||
| Autonomous superseding self-reification on the beat (flat + overlapping, contextual importance, residue) | DESIGNED / BUILDING (secondary-soul validation, 2026-08-14) |
|
||||
| Body/orbit two-zone + integration | DESIGNED / refined |
|
||||
| Operator `recall` | LIVE |
|
||||
| Operators recognize/synthesize/discern/gauge-distance (math) | LIVE (compiled) |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user