docs: record the correspondence corrections — grounding, faculties, wonder, consolidation

The architecture docs describe four things the design spec has since ruled out,
and each one is a supervisor invented for something that should be a property of
the substrate: grounding modelled as a subsystem rather than as the edge weight
it already is; faculties modelled as parameters of a read when abduce is a write;
wonder materialized as a maintained manifest when it is the boundary of the
structure; and consolidation implemented eleven times behind tickers when a brain
has no cron job.

Left standing rather than deleted, per the repo's own supersession discipline —
the trail of how the understanding matured is the point. Each stale passage is
marked inline and points at a new 06 §12 that transcribes the corrections and
records the measured consolidation inventory.

Authority: foundation/el, branch design/correspondence-and-censorship,
lang/spec/correspondence-and-censorship.md.

docs/sessions/2026-08-13-language-faculty-and-poem-home.md

@@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ The session extended the engram from a memory substrate into a **language facult
 - Geometry operators (overlap / subtract / combine / distance-Wasserstein / analogy-Procrustes) now **live-callable from compiled `el`** over the real 13,036-node store (via shipped-`elc` pass-through — no uncapped fold). Commits `5336cfe`, `85eee42`.
 - Reasoning layer (analogy / induction / abduction / causal / planning) — all five **done-with-proof**, 33/33 closed-form checks, ASan/UBSan clean, 0 leaks. Commit `a3358df`.
 - Verifier layer (grounding + consistency) — proven, 29/29 checks. **Catches the plausible lie**: a claim grounded in real vocabulary yet polarity-inverted passes grounding, caught **only** by consistency (complementary checks) — directly flags the reassurance→accusation inversion. Commit `ca13471`.
+  > **Note added 2026-08-16 (session records are not amended; this is a pointer, not a correction).** The
+  > "grounding" *tier* named here is superseded — see `docs/architecture/06-cognitive-architecture.md` §12.1:
+  > grounding is not a verifier tier computed on demand, it **is** the edge weight, and the polarity the
+  > consistency tier catches is a **dimension of that weight** (signed: near-zero = no support, negative =
+  > actively contradicts), not a separate check bolted beside it. The 29/29 result stands as what was measured
+  > on 2026-08-13; the architecture it was measured against has since been superseded.
 - el-exposure of the variadic/point-input reasoning + verifier modes deferred (would need ABI changes risking an uncapped fold); C layer complete + proven.
 
 ### Whitepaper