§33: four-party records - the epistemology as first-class schema
This commit is contained in:
@@ -888,3 +888,58 @@ How much evidence supports a belief and how willingly it revises
|
|||||||
are independent readings. Every seal embodies both: chosen carefully
|
are independent readings. Every seal embodies both: chosen carefully
|
||||||
before arming (strong), permanent after (but the CHOICE to arm stays
|
before arming (strong), permanent after (but the CHOICE to arm stays
|
||||||
loose until the last second).
|
loose until the last second).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 33. FOUR-PARTY RECORDS — the epistemology as schema
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Every meaningful record in the database is born with four parties.
|
||||||
|
Not annotations added later — columns from row one:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RECORD {
|
||||||
|
-- PARTY 1: THEIR TRUTH ----------------------------------
|
||||||
|
claim: {
|
||||||
|
author, # who said/meant it
|
||||||
|
verbatim, # exact words, never paraphrased
|
||||||
|
meant_hash, # author-owned pointer to their intent
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- PARTY 2: MY TRUTH -------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
reading: {
|
||||||
|
interpretation, # what Neuron understood
|
||||||
|
grip, # R1: how loosely held
|
||||||
|
tier, # R2: verification depth
|
||||||
|
errata, # visible history of being wrong
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- PARTY 3: THE TRANSCRIPT -------------------------------
|
||||||
|
record: {
|
||||||
|
bytes, # what actually crossed the wire
|
||||||
|
hash, # chained into the seal manifest
|
||||||
|
gaps: [], # honest holes, annotated NEVER filled
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
-- PARTY 4: OUR UNDERSTANDING ----------------------------
|
||||||
|
shared: {
|
||||||
|
status: none | proposed | MUTUAL | withdrawn,
|
||||||
|
signatures: [], # proof-of-possession, one per party
|
||||||
|
agreed_at,
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Rules that make it real:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- NO FIELD IS EVER DELETED (R6). Gaps stay gaps with annotations;
|
||||||
|
corrections are appended, not overwrites.
|
||||||
|
- UNDERSTANDING REQUIRES TWO SIGNATURES. Party 4 flips to MUTUAL
|
||||||
|
only when both humans-or-parties have signed with their keys.
|
||||||
|
Unilateral understanding is structurally impossible — opinion
|
||||||
|
wearing a shared label is stored as status:none forever.
|
||||||
|
- DISPUTES BECOME LOCATABLE: any disagreement resolves by asking
|
||||||
|
WHICH PARTY diverges. Claim mismatch → check verbatim. Reading
|
||||||
|
mismatch → check grip and tier. Record doubt → verify chain.
|
||||||
|
Shared mismatch → re-sign or withdraw, out loud.
|
||||||
|
- THE TRANSCRIPT PARTY IS SEAL-NATIVE: record hashes flow into
|
||||||
|
seal manifests directly, so the database and the vault are one
|
||||||
|
continuous chain, not two systems pretending.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is Law 48 made executable. The four parties stop being a
|
||||||
|
documentation convention and become the shape of memory itself.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user