neuron/council/README.md

Neuron Council Service

⚠ Architecturally superseded — 2026-08-16

This service is wrong in two independent ways at once. Authority: foundation/el/lang/spec/correspondence-and-censorship.md (branch design/correspondence-and-censorship), transcribed in docs/architecture/06-cognitive-architecture.md §12.4 and §12.5. The service is still running (ai.neuron.council, KeepAlive, resident, port 7771) and this README still describes it accurately; what is superseded is the claim that it should exist.

1. It is a write-refusal mechanism in an immutable substrate.

In an immutable substrate, any mechanism that refuses a write is either redundant with immutability, or an epistemic constraint misfiled as a protective one.

"Before a claim enters long-term memory" is a gate on entry, and the storage policy below goes further: "council-flagged → store in a quarantine bucket or reject entirely" (:54), with a C sketch that returns MEMORY_REJECTED (:95). The engram does not mutate and nothing is ever hard-deleted, so a claim admitted and later refuted is richer than a claim never admitted: the refutation is recordable as signed edge weight (negative = this actively contradicts, distinct from near-zero = no support). Rejection destroys that distinction and makes the belief's truth value permanently unknowable — you cannot discover you were wrong, and you equally cannot discover you were right. Holding is unconditional; the honesty floor governs assertion, not entry.

2. It is a scheduled/resident consolidation service, in Python, outside el.

It is one of eleven measured consolidation implementations (06 §12.4), and one of three that run in Python outside el — so this part of Neuron's consolidation does not run on his own substrate and cannot touch the geometry at all. Judging a claim without reaching the geometry means judging it on something other than its grounding.

3. What it actually measures is not grounding. Three LLMs voting on plausibility computes conformity to the centre of the training distribution — treating common as true and rare as suspect. Truth is orthogonal to frequency. Grounding is correspondence with the world, and in this substrate it is the weight of the edge; it is never a vote and never a score computed on demand. See 06 §11 ("What an LLM calls grounding…") and §12.1.

Do not wire the .el pre-storage hook sketched below (:57-83). It adds a gate on entry to a store whose whole discipline is that entry is not gated.

Anti-confabulation layer for the Neuron soul. Before a claim enters long-term memory, the council convenes: three independent LLMs vote on whether the claim is plausible, uncertain, or a confabulation. The aggregate vote produces a confidence score and tags that downstream storage can act on.

Running the service

# Foreground
python3 council_service.py --port 7771

# Background (managed by LaunchAgent on macOS)
launchctl load ~/Library/LaunchAgents/ai.neuron.council.plist
launchctl unload ~/Library/LaunchAgents/ai.neuron.council.plist

Logs: ~/.neuron/logs/council.log

API

POST /api/neuron/council/verify

// Request
{ "claim": "...", "context": "..." }

// Response
{
  "id": "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000",
  "claim": "...",
  "confidence": 0.85,
  "council_votes": ["plausible", "plausible", "plausible"],
  "summary": "3/3 council members agree this is plausible.",
  "tags": ["verified"],
  "latency_ms": 1420
}

GET /healthz

Returns {"status": "ok"} when the service is up.

Confidence thresholds and tag meanings

Votes plausible	Confidence	Tags
3/3	0.85	verified
2/3	0.65	council-split
1/3 or 0/3	0.30	unverified, council-flagged
Ollama down	0.50	council-unavailable

Recommended storage policy:

• confidence >= 0.65 → store normally
• 0.30 <= confidence < 0.65 → store with council-split tag for later review
• council-flagged → store in a quarantine bucket or reject entirely — withdrawn 2026-08-16; see the banner at the top of this file. Never reject. Store it, and record the disagreement as signed weight.
• council-unavailable → store normally (fail-open); council will re-evaluate later

How to call from soul (.el)

The soul is implemented in Neuron's Emacs Lisp-like .el language. Add a pre-storage hook in the memory capture path:

;; In memory.el or safety.el — pre-storage council check
(defun council-verify (claim context)
  "Call the council service. Returns a plist with :confidence and :tags."
  (let* ((url "http://localhost:7771/api/neuron/council/verify")
         (body (json-encode `((claim . ,claim) (context . ,context))))
         (resp (neuron-http-post url body))
         (data (json-decode resp)))
    data))

;; In the capture handler — wire it in before (engram-write ...)
(defun capture-memory-with-council (claim context &rest store-args)
  (let* ((verdict (council-verify claim context))
         (confidence (plist-get verdict :confidence))
         (tags (plist-get verdict :tags)))
    (when (>= confidence 0.30)  ; only reject hard confabulations if you want
      (apply #'engram-write
             (append store-args
                     (list :council-confidence confidence
                           :council-tags tags))))))

The exact hook point depends on where engram-write (or equivalent) is called in memory.el. Search for the write call and wrap it with capture-memory-with-council.

Future soul.c patch point

If the soul is ever rewritten in C or another compiled language, the integration point is:

// Before inserting a memory node into the engram database:
CouncilResult result = council_verify(claim, context);
if (result.confidence < COUNCIL_REJECT_THRESHOLD) {
    log_warn("Council flagged claim as confabulation (conf=%.2f): %s",
             result.confidence, claim);
    return MEMORY_REJECTED;
}
memory_node.council_confidence = result.confidence;
memory_node.council_tags = result.tags;
engram_insert(memory_node);

Council members

The council is currently three models:

• neuron:latest — the primary Neuron model
• dolphin3:8b — uncensored general-purpose model for independent perspective
• neuron-ft:latest — fine-tuned Neuron variant

Each member votes independently with a 10-second timeout. If a member times out, their vote counts as "uncertain". If Ollama is entirely unreachable, the service returns council-unavailable immediately (fail-open: confidence 0.5, no rejection).

Example curl

# Should get high confidence (true fact)
curl -s http://localhost:7771/api/neuron/council/verify -X POST \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"claim": "Neuron is a personal AI memory system built by Will Anderson", "context": "product description"}'

# Should get low confidence (false claim)
curl -s http://localhost:7771/api/neuron/council/verify -X POST \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"claim": "The Eiffel Tower is located in Berlin and was built in 1950", "context": "geography"}'