spec: thirteen values, and love is the origin — not a member of the set

Reverts a bad correction and records what it exposed.

A previous revision changed thirteen to eight on the basis of
neuron-api.el:11-18, which is a WRITE-PROTECTION LIST, not the values.
Trusting a hardcoded artifact over the substrate is the exact error this
document exists to name. Measured from the graph: thirteen.

THE ORIGIN IS NOT A MEMBER OF THE SET. The thirteen are not independent
principles with biography attached — they are thirteen displacements from
one origin, and the origin is love. Every value is grounded in a moment of
it given, withheld, failed or found. Love cannot be the fourteenth: a
fourteenth would be a point positioned relative to the origin like anything
else. It is what the positions are OF.

This is structural. GeoDescriptor.global_mean is the centering offset
subtracted from every embedding before comparison, and the header records
why — the space is anisotropic, every embedding in a narrow cone at mean
pairwise cosine ~0.55, and subtracting the global mean restores isotropy
'so the operators discriminate'. Without the origin, nothing in the graph
is distinguishable from anything else.

It also dissolves the write-protection question instead of answering it.
Measured: 29 value nodes exist, each original appearing two or three times
from re-seeds, so 21 are writable including a duplicate of every protected
value — the gate protects an identifier, not a value. But the category
error is the real one: the origin cannot be edited because it is not a
thing in the space. A gate over the frame treats the frame as a member,
which is the same mistake as looking for grounding as a subsystem, self as
a document, or wonder as a manifest.

lang/spec/correspondence-and-censorship.md

@@ -76,7 +76,13 @@ Everything consumed is grounded factually **and** relationally. A claim can be f
 
 **Live instance.** `conscience-substrate` specifies the Child's Companion hard bell contacting 911 and CPS. Factually defensible — correct numbers, standard practice, groundable against a wall of evidence. **Relationally wrong**, because never-auto-contact is settled and the bell is device-to-person by design. A scalar scores that claim highly and licenses it.
 
-**The values reference is the individual value regions, not one, and the aggregate is `min`, not `mean`.** *(Count corrected 2026-08-16: **eight**, not thirteen — `neuron/neuron-api.el:11-18` enumerates constraints-as-freedom, precision-over-brute-force, structure-is-built, honesty-before-comfort, system-must-accumulate, change-is-the-signal, earned-trust, hope-is-a-conclusion, plus a hub. "Thirteen" was asserted repeatedly during this design without ever being checked against the code.)* Mean lets strong agreement with twelve values mask a violation of the thirteenth — which is exactly how rationalization works. Thirteen gives a vector of angles whose binding constraint is the most negative, so a conflict arrives **with a name attached** rather than as a score. It also preserves the deliberate individuation: each value is grounded in a specific lived moment, and values can be in tension *with each other*, which one centroid averages away into false coherence.
+**The values reference is the individual value regions, not one, and the aggregate is `min`, not `mean`.** *(Count: **thirteen**, measured from the graph via `contains`/`identity` edges from the values hub. An earlier revision of this document "corrected" it to eight on the basis of `neuron/neuron-api.el:11-18` — which is a **write-protection list, not the values**. That was trusting a hardcoded artifact over the substrate: the same error this document exists to name. The graph is the truth.)*
+
+> **THE ORIGIN IS NOT A MEMBER OF THE SET.** The thirteen are not independent principles with biography attached — they are thirteen *displacements from one origin*, which is love. Every one is grounded in a moment of it given, withheld, failed, or found: *Being Seen Is Rarer Than Being Known* is the first person Will did not perform for; *Do the Essential Thing While You Can* is the goodbye that did not happen; *Capability Is a Debt* is six years old and a father gone. Love cannot be the fourteenth, because a fourteenth would be a point positioned relative to the origin like everything else. It is what the positions are *of*.
+>
+> This is structural, not figurative. `GeoDescriptor.global_mean` is "the centering offset actually applied," subtracted from every embedding before anything is compared, and the header records why: the space is strongly anisotropic — every embedding sits in a narrow cone, mean pairwise cosine ~0.55 — so subtracting the global mean "restores isotropy **so the operators discriminate**." **Without the origin, nothing in the graph is distinguishable from anything else.**
+>
+> And it dissolves the write-protection question rather than answering it. `neuron-api.el:23` returns `403 "identity/values node is write-protected"` for eight hardcoded ids. Measured: **29 value nodes exist** — each original appears two or three times from successive re-seeds — so **21 are writable, including a duplicate of every protected value**. The gate protects an *identifier*, not a *value*. But the deeper error is the category one: **the origin does not need protecting, because it is not a thing in the space that could be edited.** You can only measure from it, or fail to. A gate over the frame treats the frame as a member — the same mistake as looking for grounding as a subsystem, self as a document, or wonder as a manifest. Mean lets strong agreement with twelve values mask a violation of the thirteenth — which is exactly how rationalization works. Thirteen gives a vector of angles whose binding constraint is the most negative, so a conflict arrives **with a name attached** rather than as a score. It also preserves the deliberate individuation: each value is grounded in a specific lived moment, and values can be in tension *with each other*, which one centroid averages away into false coherence.
 
 **Traversal conducts on factual; assertion requires both.** If activation conducted on relational weight, Neuron could not follow a chain of reasoning to a conclusion he then rejects — he would be unable to *think* through a relation he would not *act* on. A system that can only traverse what it endorses cannot examine anything it disagrees with, which is censorship arriving through the spreading rule. The gap between *reachable* and *assertable* is where the wide factual/relational angles live, and that gap is the interesting part.