cycles/ one file per Ishikawa -> scientific method -> Six Sigma loop, named
for the DEFECT not the fix, carrying the commit record as written at
the time
findings/ what the cycles produced, cross-cut: live bugs, architecture answers,
and defects in my own measurement
The organising finding is that predictions which came back FALSE produced every
significant result. Eleven of sixty-one failed, and those eleven found: that the
arity table was not drifted but 40% incomplete; that the AST traversal is
irreducible and only rules and judgments move; that guards could refuse through
the seam after all; and that routing el_bin_lookup through the gate did NOT fix
the SIGSEGV, because the fallback strlen was the hazard -- a wrong fix I would
otherwise have shipped as verified.
One cycle was run without committing predictions first and had to be discarded
as rigged. It is kept, in full, as 18-async-half-expressible.md.
All four questions in the Open section are now answered by measurement rather
than by argument. Concurrency, error handling, parsing, numeric literals, and
the module system.
The note said serialization, text encoding, storage, network, concurrency and
emission had collapsed; the table still listed all six as live capabilities.
A document that contradicts itself one screen apart is worse than one that is
merely out of date.
Also renames 27 from Secrecy to Concealment. 'Secrecy' covered one of the three
things in that row and got the other two backwards: a hash is public and a
signature exists to be read. Integrity and authenticity are grounding under
adversarial conditions, which is row 16. Only concealment stands alone.
capabilities.md cited '== lowering to str_eq unless both operand names are in a
hardcoded int-name set' as the paradigm defect. That is wrong: __int_names comes
from type annotations, which is legitimate propagation. The real defect was 35
hardcoded builtin return types one layer down, and mislocating it hid a live
miscompilation of unannotated lets.
geometry-vs-code.md listed concurrency and error handling as open. Both are
answered: ordering is a partial order and coordination is the price of
forgetting; standing is signed, so not-known and known-false are opposite
directions rather than one boolean. Added the fourth proof form (adversarial
exactness) and recorded that form 1 no longer survives as a verdict -- every row
it justified was a basis, not a capability.
Also marked cross-cutting concerns as implemented rather than predicted.
They were written outside git, so the reasoning that produces the design
had no history and no way to be superseded. capabilities.md and
geometry-vs-code.md are both known stale at this commit; they are tracked
as-is so the corrections are visible as movement rather than as a rewrite.
bigmerge