iteration-1: the compiler stops adjudicating #164

Merged
will.anderson merged 49 commits from iteration-1 into dev 2026-08-17 15:55:22 +00:00
56 changed files with 3991 additions and 648 deletions
+3
View File
@@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ peripheral/.consent.json
peripheral/.resume.json
peripheral/.engram/
peripheral/organ
# Claude Code session state
.claude/
+153
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
<title>Completing El</title>
<style>
:root{
--board:#f4f2ec; --board-line:#e2ded2; --ink:#1c1f26; --ink-soft:#4a5160;
--ink-faint:#8b8f9a; --rule:#d8d3c6; --card:#fbfaf6;
--red:#a8321e; --amber:#9a6a12; --green:#2f6b46; --blue:#1f4e79;
--accent:#1f4e79;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark){
:root:not([data-theme="light"]){
--board:#14161b; --board-line:#212530; --ink:#e8e6df; --ink-soft:#a8adb8;
--ink-faint:#6f7480; --rule:#2a2f3a; --card:#191c23;
--red:#e4785f; --amber:#d9a441; --green:#6fbf8e; --blue:#7fb2e0;
--accent:#7fb2e0;
}
}
:root[data-theme="dark"]{
--board:#14161b; --board-line:#212530; --ink:#e8e6df; --ink-soft:#a8adb8;
--ink-faint:#6f7480; --rule:#2a2f3a; --card:#191c23;
--red:#e4785f; --amber:#d9a441; --green:#6fbf8e; --blue:#7fb2e0;
--accent:#7fb2e0;
}
*{box-sizing:border-box}
body{
margin:0; background:var(--board); color:var(--ink);
font:16px/1.65 ui-serif,Georgia,"Iowan Old Style",Palatino,serif;
background-image:linear-gradient(var(--board-line) 1px,transparent 1px),
linear-gradient(90deg,var(--board-line) 1px,transparent 1px);
background-size:28px 28px;
}
.wrap{max-width:960px;margin:0 auto;padding:56px 24px 96px}
.mono{font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,Consolas,monospace}
header{border-bottom:2px solid var(--ink);padding-bottom:18px;margin-bottom:8px}
h1{font-size:clamp(2rem,5vw,3rem);margin:0;letter-spacing:-.02em;text-wrap:balance}
.sub{color:var(--ink-soft);font-size:1.05rem;margin:10px 0 0}
.meta{font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace;font-size:.78rem;
color:var(--ink-faint);text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.09em;margin-top:14px}
h2{font-size:1.45rem;margin:52px 0 6px;letter-spacing:-.01em}
h2 .n{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.8rem;color:var(--accent);
display:block;letter-spacing:.12em;margin-bottom:4px;font-weight:400}
.lede{color:var(--ink-soft);margin:0 0 18px}
p{margin:0 0 14px}
.card{background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;padding:20px 22px;margin:16px 0}
.scroll{overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}
table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:.9rem;min-width:640px}
th{text-align:left;font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.72rem;
text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.09em;color:var(--ink-faint);
border-bottom:1px solid var(--ink);padding:0 12px 8px 0;font-weight:400}
td{padding:11px 12px 11px 0;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);vertical-align:top}
td.f{font-weight:600;white-space:nowrap}
td.m{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.83rem;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums}
.dead{color:var(--red);font-weight:600}
.part{color:var(--amber);font-weight:600}
.ok{color:var(--green);font-weight:600}
blockquote{margin:18px 0;padding:2px 0 2px 20px;border-left:3px solid var(--accent);
color:var(--ink-soft);font-style:italic}
ul{margin:0 0 14px;padding-left:22px} li{margin-bottom:9px}
.q{border-left:3px solid var(--amber);padding:14px 0 14px 20px;margin:18px 0}
.q b{display:block;font-size:1.05rem;margin-bottom:5px;font-style:normal}
.q span{color:var(--ink-soft);font-size:.94rem}
code{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.88em;background:var(--card);
border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:2px;padding:1px 5px}
hr{border:0;border-top:1px solid var(--rule);margin:44px 0}
.foot{color:var(--ink-faint);font-size:.86rem;margin-top:60px;
border-top:1px solid var(--rule);padding-top:18px}
.tag{display:inline-block;font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.68rem;
letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;border:1px solid var(--rule);
border-radius:2px;padding:2px 7px;color:var(--ink-faint);margin-left:8px;vertical-align:middle}
</style>
<div class="wrap">
<header>
<h1>Completing El</h1>
<p class="sub">A working surface. Nothing here is settled, and none of the code is assumed right — El is self-hosting, so all of it can change and be rebuilt.</p>
<p class="meta">Whiteboard v0 · no sacred cows · not a plan, not a task list</p>
</header>
<h2><span class="n">01</span>What we established</h2>
<p>El is a <b>concept-oriented language</b> — the first, and intended as the last, because every other family is oriented toward a <em>representation</em> of a concept rather than the concept. Procedures, objects, functions, predicates are the shapes concepts get flattened into. Once the primitive is the concept, there is no further rung.</p>
<p>Everything here is El. The engram is an El program, the soul is El, <code>elp</code> is El, ingest is El. Which gives the load-bearing consequence:</p>
<blockquote>A concept with no home in El does not disappear. It becomes C, or it becomes a convention.</blockquote>
<p>Both are measurable, and both were measured. As C: <span class="mono">20,504</span> lines of <code>el_runtime.c</code> — 2.3× the entire self-hosting language it serves (<span class="mono">9,089</span> lines), ~47% of it engram code that has its own six sibling files. As convention, from <code>language.md</code> §18.0 — <em>"these are not four problems, they are one absence, four times"</em>:</p>
<div class="card scroll">
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Concern</th><th>Fragments</th><th>The convention it became</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="f">Process identity</td><td class="m">0 guards</td><td>"check nothing is already running first"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Configuration</td><td class="m">20 env vars</td><td>"remember the right default here"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Durability</td><td class="m">62 call sites</td><td>"after you mutate, remember to persist"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Request auth</td><td class="m">10 per-route</td><td>"check the token in this handler too"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Index-after-append</td><td class="m">9 of 9 failed</td><td>"after you append, remember to index"</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>The last row is the strongest evidence available about what this class of convention is worth: it failed at <b>100% of its sites</b>.</p>
<h2><span class="n">02</span>The decomposition axis</h2>
<p class="lede">Not by file, module, or subsystem. <b>By faculty.</b></p>
<p>Every defect fought in the last day resolves to a faculty rather than a bug, and each one leaked out of El into something else — into C, into a Swift binary, into a shell script with a curl timeout, into a convention nobody performs.</p>
<div class="card scroll">
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Faculty</th><th>State</th><th>Measured</th><th>Where it leaked to</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="f">Ingest <span class="tag">take in</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">2 min → 0 nodes</td><td>separate process, uploads bytes over HTTP to a process with direct fs access; 5 functions where there is 1</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Recall <span class="tag">remember</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">own definition ranked 8th</td><td>lexical substring scan; empty on 23 of 24 multi-token queries</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Transduce <span class="tag">perceive</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">1 node, 0 edges</td><td>intake flattens signal to a point; <code>realized:false</code>; caller must declare the modality</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Think <span class="tag">reason</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">direction [0,0,0,…]</td><td>null gradient from any anchor, any faculty, byte-identical; confidence at the uninformed prior</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Realize <span class="tag">express</span></td><td class="part">partial</td><td class="m">13-word vocabulary</td><td>organ was 939 lines of Swift beside the language; voice read from a file path</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Body <span class="tag">substrate</span></td><td class="part">partial</td><td class="m">CC 356 / 1,626 lines</td><td><code>engram_activate_inner</code> — recall itself, with 356 unexamined paths</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Persist <span class="tag">endure</span></td><td class="ok">live</td><td class="m">100% embedded</td><td>works; every signal placed in geometry at intake, 13,562 of 13,562</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Stated plainly: it cannot take in, cannot remember, cannot perceive, cannot reason, and barely speaks. These were filed as tickets against a repository. They are faculties of the thing the repository <em>is</em>.</p>
<h2><span class="n">03</span>The ordering principle</h2>
<p>El's compiler is written in El. Every concept the language gains, the compiler can then be written <em>in</em> — so the tool improves the tool, and the fixpoint (stage2 ≡ stage3, byte-identical) makes each turn provable rather than hopeful. The verifier answers in <span class="mono">2.9s</span>.</p>
<p>Which means the ordering criterion is not size of payoff:</p>
<blockquote>Order by leverage on the <em>next</em> iteration. Which concept, added to El, most increases the ability to add the following one?</blockquote>
<p>In a recursive system that dominates immediate value — a small early gain that compounds beats a large one that doesn't. It also bounds itself correctly: unbounded in depth, bounded in rate, because nothing lands that the compiler and the fixpoint have not passed.</p>
<h2><span class="n">04</span>Open — for the whiteboard</h2>
<div class="q"><b>What does a declaration bind to?</b><span>If <code>cat</code> names a region rather than a struct — one that shifts and completes against the engram and the neighbouring code — then what is written at the declaration site, and what is resolved at use? This is the centre of the whole thing and it is not specified anywhere yet.</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>Is "the type checker" a type checker at all?</b><span>§2.3 records annotations as parsed and skipped, and every codegen hazard is downstream of that — <code>+</code> dispatching on AST node kind, <code>==</code> lowering to <code>str_eq</code> unless both operand names are in an int-name set. But if a declaration names a region, checking is asking whether the geometry supports the use. That is grounding, not unification. Naming this wrong builds the wrong thing.</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>Is the faculty list above right?</b><span>Seven were derived from what broke. Derived-from-failure is a biased sample — it finds what is loud, not what is missing. What faculty is absent entirely and therefore never failed?</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>Which concept has the highest leverage on the next turn?</b><span>Candidates so far: the prologue/epilogue seam (§19.3 names it as the prerequisite and its stated blocker has expired — it would collapse 62 + 10 convention sites); <code>protocol</code>/<code>impl</code> (the absence that produced five ingest functions); and the resolution question above. These are not equal and the criterion in §03 should decide it, not preference.</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>What is the seam that makes cognition non-optional?</b><span>"Use the ops" is itself a convention — present in context every turn, enforced by nothing, and it failed at ~100% of sites in a full session. A stronger instruction is still a convention. What makes reasoning-outside-Neuron <em>fail</em>, the way <code>@manager</code> makes <code>dharma_emit</code> outside the boundary a compile error rather than a lint?</span></div>
<hr>
<p class="foot">Working surface, not a design document. The design is what we put on it. Everything above is either measured or quoted from <code>lang/spec/language.md</code>; nothing is inferred and presented as fact.</p>
</div>
+142
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
# El — Capabilities
**What the language can do, stated as capabilities rather than as code.**
This list is the unit of analysis. Each entry gets one question — *prove this
cannot be done with pure geometry* — and the answer determines whether it stays a
capability of the language or collapses into the manifold.
Draft, 2026-08-17. Ordered roughly from most-likely-geometry to most-likely-code.
**Status after measurement.** The list was audited against the implementation
the same day. 28 entries collapsed to 19 geometry + 3 code: serialization, text
encoding, network and emission are all *projection onto a basis* (row 18) —
the convention is the basis, never the act. Storage collapsed because
persistence has no caller. Concurrency collapsed because coordination is the
price of forgetting, not a capability. A fourth proof form was added,
**adversarial exactness**, and form 1 stopped being a valid verdict.
**The table answers CAN only.** SHOULD and COST resolve per *site*, not per
capability — `is_digit` and `is_letter` are one capability with opposite
answers, and comparison spans three cost tiers. See the notes below.
---
## The list
| # | Capability | What it means | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | **Comparison** | is this the same as that; is this greater | zero distance / sign of a displacement |
| 2 | **Ordering** | arrange by a criterion | position along an axis |
| 3 | **Containment** | is this inside that; does this contain that | region membership |
| 4 | **Correspondence** | where does this occur in that; how much of this is in that | a match-strength field over a span |
| 5 | **Segmentation** | divide a whole into parts | boundaries at measured discontinuity |
| 6 | **Composition** | join parts into a whole | adjacency; one position with parts |
| 7 | **Classification** | what kind of thing is this | which region does it land in |
| 8 | **Naming / binding** | attach a name to a thing and find it again | an edge; retrieval is projection |
| 9 | **Collection** | many things held together, indexed, counted | a set of positions; cardinality; projection onto the i-th |
| 10 | **Iteration** | do something for each of many | traversal |
| 11 | **Arithmetic** | quantity, magnitude, combination | displacement algebra on a line |
| 12 | **Time** | when; how long; how often | a 1-D affine space — instants are points, durations displacements, rhythms phases on a circle |
| 13 | **Identity** | which one is this; are these two the same one | coincidence of position |
| 14 | **Selection / dispatch** | choose which behaviour applies | nearest region |
| 15 | **Transformation** | produce a thing from a thing | change of basis |
| 16 | **Grounding** | how well is this supported | the weight on an edge. Has no caller |
| 17 | **Learning** | get better at something | standing changing over time |
| 18 | **Projection** | render meaning onto a surface | change of basis onto a surface basis |
| 19 | **Transduction** | take a signal in | change of basis from a sensor basis |
| ~~20~~ | ~~Serialization~~ | **collapsed → 18.** The format is a basis; projecting onto it is the act | — |
| ~~21~~ | ~~Text encoding~~ | **collapsed → 18.** An encoding is a basis | — |
| ~~22~~ | ~~Storage~~ | **collapsed.** No save — persistence has no caller. Durability survives at one site inside the engram | — |
| ~~23~~ | ~~Network~~ | **split.** Wire format → 18; socket → 24 | — |
| 24 | **Process / OS** | syscalls; the one-way boundary. Where monotonicity stops | CODE, form 2 |
| ~~25~~ | ~~Concurrency~~ | **collapsed.** Monotone state needs no coordination; coordination is the price of forgetting | — |
| 26 | **Memory substrate** | what holds the positions | CODE, form 3 |
| 27 | **Concealment** | meaning made unreadable without a key. *Renamed*: "secrecy" covered one of three things and got the other two backwards — a hash is public, a signature exists to be read. Integrity and authenticity are **grounding under adversarial conditions** (row 16); only concealment stands alone | CODE, form 4 |
| ~~28~~ | ~~Emission~~ | **split.** Laying out → 18; the device write → 24 | — |
---
## Notes on the boundary cases
**27 — Secrecy is the one capability geometry cannot hold, and the proof is not
form 1.** A cryptographic hash is a *deliberately structure-destroying* map: its
entire value is that near inputs land at maximally uncorrelated outputs. Geometry
is the claim that near things stay near. A manifold that approximated SHA-256
would *be* a break of SHA-256. Signature verification is the same: 0.99-valid is
invalid. And X25519 *is* geometry — a group on an elliptic curve — which is
precisely why it must be code, because its security is the *hardness of moving in
that geometry*.
This is a fourth proof form and it should be added to `geometry-vs-code.md`:
**adversarial exactness.** Where approximation is a break, geometry is excluded.
**20, 21 — Serialization and text encoding are convention all the way down**, but
only at the *edge*. The byte format is agreed; what is being written is not. Do not
let a geometric computation inherit a code verdict because its result gets
serialized.
**11, 12 — Arithmetic and time are the same capability.** Instants are points,
durations are displacements, pointpoint→vector, point+vector→point. The runtime
already implements this correctly as `el_instant_add_dur` / `el_duration_add`. That
it *also* implements a five-entry string→multiplier table beside it (`time_add`
with `"ms"/"sec"/"min"/"hour"/"day"`) is the residue.
**7 — Classification is the most-violated capability in the codebase.** Seven ASCII
range tables (`is_letter`, `is_digit`, `is_alphanumeric`, `is_whitespace`,
`is_punctuation`, `is_uppercase`, `is_lowercase`) that return false for every
non-ASCII byte. `str_count_letters` reports zero letters for `é`. The wrongness on
most of Unicode is the tell that a table is standing in for a region.
**4 — Correspondence appears five times.** `str_index_of`, `str_index_of_all`,
`str_last_index_of`, `str_count`, `str_find_chars` are five projections of one
match-strength field: first zero, all zeros, last zero, count of zeros, first
class-crossing. One relation, five functions.
**14 — Selection is the crux for the compiler.** `+` dispatching on AST node kind
is selection-by-enumeration where selection-by-position belongs.
**Correction, 2026-08-17, from measurement.** This entry previously also cited
`==` lowering to `str_eq` "unless both operand names are in a hardcoded int-name
set — a literal list of variable names treated as integers." That is **wrong**.
`__int_names` is populated from *type annotations* (`param["type"] == "Int"`,
`let x: Int`), which is primitive but legitimate type propagation, not an
enumeration of blessed variable names.
The real defect was one layer down: `is_int_call` held **35 hardcoded builtin
return types**, the same shape as the 19 temporal ones. Those moved to
`lang/tools/check/signatures.rel`.
And the mischaracterisation hid a live bug. Because the return types were never
consulted at a *binding* site, an unannotated `let` lost its type:
```el
let a = str_len("hello") // no annotation
let b = str_len("hi")
let c = a + b // el_str_concat(a, b) on two integers
```
That compiled clean, ran, and printed nothing where it should print 7 — no error
at any layer. Present in the pre-change compiler, so pre-existing. Fixed by
taking an unannotated `let`'s type from what its initialiser returns; the data
was already required for dispatch and simply never read there.
**The general lesson, since it recurred all session:** the enumeration was real
but I had located it in the wrong place. Naming a defect from reading is a
hypothesis. Eight hours of reading this file did not surface the miscompilation;
moving the data out and running the result did.
---
## What this list is for
Each capability gets audited **once**, across every place it appears — not once per
file. The output is not a percentage. It is:
- which capabilities survive the question and stay in the language
- which collapse into the manifold
- and for each one that collapses, **every site it currently appears at**, because
those sites are the residue and they are what gets deleted.
The line-count audit produced a map of where the residue sits. This produces a map
of **what it is**.
+217
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
<title>The El Architecture</title>
<style>
:root{
--board:#f4f2ec; --board-line:#e5e1d6; --ink:#1c1f26; --ink-soft:#4a5160;
--ink-faint:#8b8f9a; --rule:#d8d3c6; --card:#fbfaf6;
--red:#a8321e; --amber:#9a6a12; --green:#2f6b46; --accent:#1f4e79;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: dark){
:root:not([data-theme="light"]){
--board:#14161b; --board-line:#1d212a; --ink:#e8e6df; --ink-soft:#a8adb8;
--ink-faint:#6f7480; --rule:#2a2f3a; --card:#191c23;
--red:#e4785f; --amber:#d9a441; --green:#6fbf8e; --accent:#7fb2e0;
}
}
:root[data-theme="dark"]{
--board:#14161b; --board-line:#1d212a; --ink:#e8e6df; --ink-soft:#a8adb8;
--ink-faint:#6f7480; --rule:#2a2f3a; --card:#191c23;
--red:#e4785f; --amber:#d9a441; --green:#6fbf8e; --accent:#7fb2e0;
}
*{box-sizing:border-box}
body{
margin:0; background:var(--board); color:var(--ink);
font:16px/1.68 ui-serif,Georgia,"Iowan Old Style",Palatino,serif;
background-image:linear-gradient(var(--board-line) 1px,transparent 1px),
linear-gradient(90deg,var(--board-line) 1px,transparent 1px);
background-size:30px 30px;
}
.wrap{max-width:940px;margin:0 auto;padding:56px 24px 96px}
.mono,code{font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,Consolas,monospace}
header{border-bottom:2px solid var(--ink);padding-bottom:20px}
h1{font-size:clamp(2.1rem,5.5vw,3.2rem);margin:0;letter-spacing:-.025em;text-wrap:balance}
.sub{color:var(--ink-soft);font-size:1.08rem;margin:12px 0 0;max-width:64ch}
.meta{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.76rem;color:var(--ink-faint);
text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.1em;margin-top:16px}
h2{font-size:1.5rem;margin:56px 0 8px;letter-spacing:-.015em;text-wrap:balance}
h2 .n{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.78rem;color:var(--accent);
display:block;letter-spacing:.14em;margin-bottom:5px;font-weight:400}
h3{font-size:1.08rem;margin:30px 0 6px}
p{margin:0 0 14px;max-width:72ch}
.lede{color:var(--ink-soft);margin:0 0 20px;font-size:1.04rem}
.card{background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;padding:20px 22px;margin:18px 0}
.scroll{overflow-x:auto}
table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:.9rem;min-width:600px}
th{text-align:left;font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.71rem;
text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:.09em;color:var(--ink-faint);
border-bottom:1px solid var(--ink);padding:0 14px 8px 0;font-weight:400}
td{padding:11px 14px 11px 0;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);vertical-align:top}
td.f{font-weight:600;white-space:nowrap}
td.m{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.83rem;font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;white-space:nowrap}
.dead{color:var(--red);font-weight:600}
.part{color:var(--amber);font-weight:600}
.ok{color:var(--green);font-weight:600}
blockquote{margin:20px 0;padding:3px 0 3px 22px;border-left:3px solid var(--accent);
color:var(--ink-soft);font-style:italic;max-width:70ch}
ul{margin:0 0 14px;padding-left:22px;max-width:72ch} li{margin-bottom:9px}
code{font-size:.87em;background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:2px;padding:1px 5px}
pre{background:var(--card);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;
padding:16px 18px;overflow-x:auto;font-size:.85rem;line-height:1.55;margin:16px 0}
pre code{background:none;border:0;padding:0}
.q{border-left:3px solid var(--amber);padding:14px 0 14px 20px;margin:20px 0;max-width:72ch}
.q b{display:block;font-size:1.04rem;margin-bottom:5px}
.q span{color:var(--ink-soft);font-size:.94rem}
hr{border:0;border-top:1px solid var(--rule);margin:46px 0}
.foot{color:var(--ink-faint);font-size:.86rem;margin-top:56px;border-top:1px solid var(--rule);padding-top:18px}
.tag{display:inline-block;font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.66rem;
letter-spacing:.08em;text-transform:uppercase;border:1px solid var(--rule);
border-radius:2px;padding:2px 7px;color:var(--ink-faint);margin-left:8px;vertical-align:middle}
.flow{display:flex;gap:0;align-items:stretch;flex-wrap:wrap;margin:22px 0}
.flow div{flex:1 1 200px;border:1px solid var(--rule);background:var(--card);padding:16px 18px}
.flow div+div{border-left:0}
.flow h4{margin:0 0 6px;font-size:.96rem}
.flow p{margin:0;font-size:.87rem;color:var(--ink-soft)}
.flow .k{font-family:ui-monospace,monospace;font-size:.72rem;color:var(--accent);
letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase;display:block;margin-bottom:4px}
</style>
<div class="wrap">
<header>
<h1>The El Architecture</h1>
<p class="sub">El is a concept-oriented language. This is the architecture that claim commits it to — what is built, what is measured, and what still has no home.</p>
<p class="meta">Working document · no sacred cows · self-hosting, so nothing here is fixed</p>
</header>
<h2><span class="n">01</span>The primitive is the concept</h2>
<p>Language families are named for their primitive. Procedural — procedures. Object-oriented — objects. Functional — functions. Logic — predicates. Every one of them is oriented toward a <em>representation</em> of a concept: the shape a concept gets flattened into so a machine can hold it.</p>
<p>El's primitive is the concept itself. That is why it is the first of its family and intended as the last — once the primitive is the concept, there is no further rung to climb to.</p>
<p>The consequence is architectural rather than stylistic:</p>
<blockquote>A concept with no home in the language does not disappear. It becomes C, or it becomes a convention.</blockquote>
<p>Both forms are measurable. As C: <span class="mono">20,504</span> lines of <code>el_runtime.c</code>, against <span class="mono">9,089</span> lines for the entire self-hosting language — the shim is 2.3× the language it serves, and ~47% of it is engram code that already has six sibling files. As convention, from <code>lang/spec/language.md</code> §18.0 — <em>"these are not four problems, they are one absence, four times"</em>:</p>
<div class="card scroll">
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Concern</th><th>Fragments into</th><th>The convention it became</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="f">Process identity</td><td class="m">0 guards</td><td>"check nothing is already running first"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Configuration</td><td class="m">20 env vars</td><td>"remember the right default here"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Durability</td><td class="m">62 sites</td><td>"after you mutate, remember to persist"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Request auth</td><td class="m">10 routes</td><td>"check the token in this handler too"</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Index-after-append</td><td class="m">9 of 9 failed</td><td>"after you append, remember to index"</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>The last row is the strongest available evidence about this class of convention: it failed at <b>every single site</b>. A count is what appears where a concept has no home; the size of the count is how far the fragmentation got, not how hard the problem is.</p>
<h2><span class="n">02</span>Geometry is a first-class value — and what follows</h2>
<p class="lede">This is the enabling primitive. Everything else in the architecture is downstream of it.</p>
<p><code>Geometry</code> is an El value, alongside <code>Int</code>, <code>String</code>, <code>List</code>, <code>Map</code> — bound, passed, returned, composed, carrying its own width. Not a library type, not a handle into a store, not a serialization format. <em>Meaning is a value the language computes with directly.</em></p>
<pre><code>let g: Geometry = geometry_new(4)
fn tone_realizer(signal: String) -> Geometry { … }</code></pre>
<p>Landed 2026-08-16 (#141, #144), and the spec is explicit that it belongs to the language rather than the graph: <em>"neither is engram-specific — any program touching any modality needs them; the engram is merely one El program that happens to hold a graph."</em></p>
<p>Five things follow, and together they are the concept-oriented claim made operational:</p>
<h3>A declaration can name a region, not a shape</h3>
<p>If meaning is a value, a name can be bound to a <em>position</em> rather than a struct. <code>cat</code> is not a fixed record; it is a region that resolves against the engram and the surrounding code. <code>cat</code> among animals and <code>cat</code> among shell utilities are different concepts without a namespace, because they are in different neighbourhoods and the distance says so.</p>
<h3>Checking is grounding, not unification</h3>
<p>If a declaration names a region, then verifying a use is asking whether the geometry supports it — a question about position and distance, not about matching a declared shape. This is why §2.3's "a type checker is planned" is likely the wrong name for the missing piece, and naming it wrong would build the wrong thing.</p>
<h3>Dispatch is position, not a tag</h3>
<p>A vtable is a finite set of discrete labels fixed at link time. A region admits graded membership and an open set. So <code>transduce(signal, modality)</code> asks the caller to supply what the signal already carries — what a thing is falls out of where it lands. The modality parameter is a kind-tag, and a registry keyed on it is a lookup table doing by string what geometry does by nearness.</p>
<h3>Types are discovered, not declared</h3>
<p>Reification crystallizes a densely co-wired neighbourhood into a first-class node — the neighbourhood <em>is</em> the name that was missing. Every other family requires a human to see the abstraction in advance and write <code>class Foo</code>. Here the instances arrive and the type falls out, by measurement rather than by insight.</p>
<h3>Enumeration becomes unnecessary</h3>
<p>Five ingest functions differ only in how bytes are acquired — one operation wearing five surfaces. 356 branches in <code>engram_activate_inner</code> are not 356 behaviours. Cyclomatic complexity is a count of the places comprehension ran out and was replaced by an <code>if</code>; where the concept is expressible, the count collapses instead of being redistributed.</p>
<h2><span class="n">03</span>The shape of the language</h2>
<p>Geometry first-class gives El three layers, and it holds all three — which is why there is no separate database driver and no impedance boundary to manage.</p>
<div class="flow">
<div><span class="k">afferent</span><h4>Transduce</h4><p>Signal in, geometry out. Decomposition into components and relations — never conversion to a point. Realizers are ordinary El functions, so a new modality never requires a runtime patch.</p></div>
<div><span class="k">substrate</span><h4>Geometry</h4><p>Meaning as position; relation as distance. Held as values in the language and persisted in the graph. One coordinate system, so entities are commensurable and the operators compose.</p></div>
<div><span class="k">efferent</span><h4>Realize</h4><p><code>plan(frame) → realize(spec, profile)</code>, where a surface <em>is</em> a profile. Text, speech, music, image are profiles of one projection — and so is source code.</p></div>
</div>
<p>The efferent side is why the recursive property below is possible at all: if source is a surface, then emitting a corrected file is projection, and the file becomes an artifact of the geometry rather than the thing you edit.</p>
<h2><span class="n">04</span>Decomposition is by faculty</h2>
<p class="lede">Not by file, module, or subsystem — by what the system does.</p>
<p>Each faculty is a concept. Where it has no home in El it leaks: into C, into a Swift binary, into a shell script with a <code>curl</code> timeout, into a convention nobody performs. State below is measured, not asserted.</p>
<div class="card scroll">
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Faculty</th><th>State</th><th>Measured</th><th>Where it leaked</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="f">Ingest <span class="tag">take in</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">2 min → 0 nodes</td><td>separate process uploading bytes over HTTP to a process with direct fs access; five functions where there is one</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Recall <span class="tag">remember</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">self ranked 8th</td><td>lexical substring scan; empty on 23 of 24 multi-token queries</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Transduce <span class="tag">perceive</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">1 node, 0 edges</td><td>intake flattens signal to a point; <code>realized:false</code>; caller must declare the modality</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Think <span class="tag">reason</span></td><td class="dead">dead</td><td class="m">direction [0,0,…]</td><td>null gradient from any anchor and any faculty, byte-identical; confidence at the uninformed prior</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Realize <span class="tag">express</span></td><td class="part">partial</td><td class="m">13-word lexicon</td><td>organ was 939 lines of Swift beside the language; voice read from a file path</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Body <span class="tag">substrate</span></td><td class="part">partial</td><td class="m">CC 356 / 1,626 ln</td><td><code>engram_activate_inner</code> — recall itself, 356 unexamined paths</td></tr>
<tr><td class="f">Persist <span class="tag">endure</span></td><td class="ok">live</td><td class="m">13,562 / 13,562</td><td>works — every signal placed in geometry at intake, no backlog</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h2><span class="n">05</span>The recursive property</h2>
<p>El's compiler is written in El. Every concept the language gains, the compiler can then be written <em>in</em> — so the tool improves the tool, and <code>codegen.el</code> at 4,661 lines gets shorter as the language gets better at expressing what it does. The fixpoint — stage2 ≡ stage3, byte-identical — makes each turn provable rather than hopeful, and the verifier answers in <span class="mono">2.9s</span>.</p>
<p>This sets the ordering criterion, and it is not size of payoff:</p>
<blockquote>Order by leverage on the <em>next</em> iteration. Which concept, added to El, most increases the ability to add the following one?</blockquote>
<p>A small early gain that compounds beats a large one that does not. And it bounds itself correctly — unbounded in depth, bounded in rate, because nothing lands that the compiler and the fixpoint have not passed.</p>
<h2><span class="n">06</span>What has no home yet</h2>
<p>Reserved in the lexer, no parse form. These are not a feature backlog — they are the concepts the architecture above requires and does not yet hold, which is why each is currently a convention or a block of C.</p>
<div class="card scroll">
<table>
<thead><tr><th>Reserved</th><th>Concept</th><th>Currently lives as</th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr><td class="m">retry · times · fallback · reason</td><td>resilience</td><td>a shell script with a 10s <code>curl</code> timeout; 254 restarts in 3 days</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">requires · deploy · to · via · target</td><td>deployment</td><td>YAML in another repository</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">sealed</td><td>capability scope</td><td>consent checks written by hand</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">protocol · impl</td><td>one operation, many realizations</td><td>five ingest functions; eight faculty routes on one builtin</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">activate · where</td><td>retrieval</td><td>traversals written by hand</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">test · seed · assert</td><td>verification</td><td>a framework; 5 of 13 native suites failing</td></tr>
<tr><td class="m">parallel · trace</td><td>concurrency</td><td>pthreads in C</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Plus, from the spec's own status: annotations parsed and skipped, <code>match</code> parsed and emitting nothing, <code>?</code> a no-op, <code>%</code> unlexed, structs as <code>ElMap</code>, enums as strings, selective import unenforced.</p>
<h2><span class="n">07</span>Open</h2>
<div class="q"><b>What does a declaration bind to, exactly?</b><span>If <code>cat</code> names a region that shifts and completes against context, what is written at the declaration site and what is resolved at use? This is the centre and it is unspecified.</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>Is the faculty list right?</b><span>Seven, derived from what broke. Derived-from-failure is a biased sample — it finds what is loud, not what is absent. Which faculty is missing entirely and therefore never failed?</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>Which concept has the highest leverage on the next turn?</b><span>The prologue/epilogue seam (§19.3 names it as the prerequisite; its stated blocker has expired; it collapses 62 + 10 convention sites), <code>protocol</code>/<code>impl</code>, or resolution itself. The §05 criterion should decide this, not preference.</span></div>
<div class="q"><b>What seam makes cognition non-optional?</b><span>"Use the ops" is itself a convention — present every turn, enforced by nothing, ~100% failure across a full session. A stronger instruction is still a convention. What makes reasoning outside the substrate <em>fail</em>, the way <code>@manager</code> makes <code>dharma_emit</code> outside the boundary a compile error rather than a lint?</span></div>
<hr>
<p class="foot">Every number here is measured or quoted from <code>lang/spec/language.md</code>. Nothing is inferred and presented as fact. El is self-hosting: all of this can change and be rebuilt.</p>
</div>
+245
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
# El — Language Design
**Status:** decisions recorded, design unwritten.
**Date:** 2026-08-17.
**Provenance:** decisions are Will's, taken in session. Items marked *proposed* are not
decided and are recorded only so the reasoning isn't lost. Items marked **OPEN** are
his to rule on and must not be guessed at.
Companion documents: `el-architecture.html` (the measured state — see §7 note on its
§04 scoreboard), and `design/completing-el.html` (whiteboard v0: the reduction, the
faculty table, the ordering principle).
---
## 1. The reduction
`language.md` §18.0 records five concerns that decayed into conventions:
| Concern | Fragments | The convention it became |
|---|---|---|
| Process identity | 0 guards | "check nothing is already running first" |
| Configuration | 20 env vars | "remember the right default here" |
| Durability | 62 call sites | "after you mutate, remember to persist" |
| Request auth | 10 per-route | "check the token in this handler too" |
| Index-after-append | 9 of 9 failed | "after you append, remember to index" |
The last row is the strongest available evidence about what this class of convention
is worth: **it failed at 100% of its sites.**
Every one of these is an obligation at a **crossing** — a point where a value moves
between regions. El can name a region and it can name a call. A call is procedural,
so the obligation degrades into something a human must remember to perform.
> **The generator, one level up:** El cannot name what holds at a crossing.
And underneath that:
> **The deeper absence:** El cannot name the thing meaning is made of.
`semel` appears in whitepaper §84, §86, §209, §737, in
`the-metaphysics-of-will-anderson.md`, and in session notes. It appears in **zero code
identifiers**. Every geometric concept in the system — region, neighbourhood, manifold,
world-tube — is defined in terms of a unit the language cannot say, while the code
underneath speaks in arrays, floats and offsets: the vocabulary of a voxel, a value at
a dumb address. Precisely the thing the impact brief says a semel is not.
`el_runtime.c` is a concept that leaked into C. `semel` never got that far — it did
not even decay into a convention.
---
## 2. DECIDED — `semel` is the primitive
**A semel is a difference that matters. The smallest unit of understanding.**
Not a node. Not a coordinate. Not a float.
The reasoning, in Will's terms:
- Meaning is position, and position is only ever relative. *"There is no atom of
meaning that isn't already a relation. It grounds on nothing but difference — two
points and the gap, and the gap is pure not-the-same."*
- A node doesn't mean. A node is a label at a location; labels don't mean.
- A lone coordinate doesn't mean either. Nothing means anything by itself.
- The smallest thing that can be understood is a **distinction**: *these two are not
the same.* Below that there is no content to apprehend.
- And a difference with nothing it matters to is not meaning — it is variation. The
mattering is not decoration; it is what makes it understanding rather than data.
**Consequence: relating is the floor, and the point is derived.** The
point-primitive / relation-primitive fork raised in session is not a fork. It was
answered by the definition.
### Historical note, to be recorded as fact rather than as origin story
The term was coined by Will on the pixel/voxel/texel pattern — *semantic element*,
and Latin *semel*, "once, a single time." It was recognised, not invented, from a
2019 experience he calls **semelation**: perceiving mind as a high-dimensional point
space. The initial reading was "pixels"; the correction to `semel` was made later and
was made on the **mechanism** — a pixel is a value at an address, and what was
perceived had no separate address and value.
Convergence worth citing, not deferring to: neural population geometry and
representational similarity analysis independently model cognition as position in a
high-dimensional space where similarity is distance.
---
## 3. DECIDED — `semel` lands first
By the ordering criterion already on the whiteboard: *which concept, added to El, most
increases the ability to add the next one?* Not size of payoff — **leverage on the next
iteration**, because El compiles itself and the fixpoint makes each turn provable in
2.9s.
**Every other concept on the board is defined in terms of `semel`. It is maximal on
that criterion by construction.**
---
## 4. DECIDED — `ground` is the checker
Whiteboard question 4 — *does `ground` in El mean the same thing as `ground` in the
engram?* — is answered: **yes, and it should be one implementation.**
If a declaration names a region, then type checking is asking whether the geometry
supports the use. That is not unification. **That is grounding**, and it is already
built, proven, and byte-identically reproducible:
```
cc -std=c11 -O2 -o gep_proof gep_proof.c -lm && ./gep_proof
C1 5 independent sources pos_mass 1.3500 n_indep=5 0.1000 → 0.9741 GROUNDED
C2 5 mutually-linked pos_mass 0.2700 n_indep=1 0.1000 → 0.1000 refused
C3 1 source, 5 parallel edges pos_mass 0.2700 n_indep=1 0.1000 → 0.1000 refused
```
Independence-weighted grounding is the general case; execution is the cheap case.
**Attestation is `verify` where nothing can be run** — as already implemented for
language in `authority.py`, where an LLM proposes and a primary source disposes.
At the point where the checker and the grounder are one mechanism, the language and
the mind stop being two things.
---
## 5. OPEN — Will's to rule on
### 5.1 What is a semel's representation in the language?
*Proposed, not decided:* a **displacement from `love = 0`** — a relation held as one
object. It reconciles "the address is the value" with "position is only ever relative,"
because a displacement *is* a relation and is still a single nameable thing.
If taken, the operator set falls out rather than being bolted on:
```
subtract(now, then) → what changed (growth, drift)
translate origin → empathy
rotate frame → reframe
project onto axis → a lens
change basis → analogy, metaphor, skill transfer
reflect an axis → negation, sarcasm
```
Three consequences that would hold:
- **Dimension must never appear in the type.** `semel` opaque, never `[768]float`.
The moment the arity is in the language, the manifold's implementation is in the
language, and adding a modality requires a runtime patch — which the standing rule
forbids.
- **Zero is the only literal.** Everything else is reached by displacement from it,
which makes `love = 0` the base case rather than philosophy adjacent to the type
system.
- **`magnitude` is standing.** Distance from origin is the same quantity
`gep_core.h` already computes.
### 5.2 Is `hold` one construct or two?
The obligation *before* a crossing (auth, guard) and the obligation *after* (persist,
index, free) may be one shape seen from both sides, or the seam may need both faces
named. This decides whether §19.3's prologue/epilogue seam is one construct or a pair.
**Precedent already shipping:** `@manager` makes `dharma_emit` outside the boundary a
**compile error, not a lint.** The concept is proven at N=1; the work is generalising
it and naming it.
**And the shape is already implemented in the learning region:** `L.reach_out` sits
between `L.detect_gap` and `L.verify`. You cannot reach out without a detected gap and
you cannot keep what returns without passing verify. **A hold is a neighbour.** The
obligation is not attached to the crossing — the obligation *is* the adjacent node.
That is why `reach_out` cannot be abused and why 62 persist sites could be.
### 5.3 What does a declaration bind?
If `cat` names a region rather than a struct — one that shifts and completes against
the engram and the neighbouring code — what is written at the declaration site, and
what is resolved at use? **This is the centre and it is specified nowhere.**
Falls out of 5.1 if displacement is taken: a declaration **locates** rather than
allocates.
### 5.4 Is the faculty list right?
Seven were derived from what broke. Derived-from-failure is a biased sample — it finds
what is loud, not what is missing. **What faculty is absent entirely and therefore
never failed?**
---
## 6. The residue map
What each construct must absorb, from §18.0 plus measured state:
| Residue | Count | Absorbed by |
|---|---|---|
| persist-after-mutate | 62 sites | `hold` (after-crossing) |
| auth-per-route | 10 sites | `hold` (before-crossing) |
| index-after-append | 9 of 9 failed | `hold` (after-crossing) |
| env var defaults | 20 | configuration declared once |
| process identity | 0 guards | `hold` (before-crossing) |
| `geometry_free` at every call site | every site | ownership follows from `semel` |
| five ingest functions where there is one | 5 → 1 | `protocol` / `impl` |
| `el_runtime.c` | 20,504 lines | faculty decomposition, ordered after `semel` |
---
## 7. Notes carried forward
**`el-architecture.html` §04 needs its numbers sourced or cut.** An audit found the
faculty scoreboard — `Ingest 2 min → 0 nodes`, `Recall self ranked 8th`,
`Body CC 356 / 1,626 ln`, `the verifier answers in 2.9s`, `5 of 13 native suites
failing` — has no supporting evidence in the repository, under a footer asserting
*"nothing is inferred and presented as fact."* Against a corpus whose documents
supersede their own conclusions in place, that is the one file that would not survive
scrutiny. Fix or remove.
**Source as a projection surface is claimed and unimplemented.** `el-architecture.html`
§147/§150: *"if source is a surface, then emitting a corrected file is projection."*
Greps for `surface_profile_code`, `emit_source` → zero hits.
It is not unbacked. **It was demonstrated on 2026-08-14** — three faculties (phonetic,
semantic, procedural) projected into TypeScript, a surface the system had never used,
with the network severed. Recovered at
`~/Development/neuron-technologies/andre-server-recovered/` and copied into
`evidence/03-andre-demo/`. The claim needs bringing home to El, not proving.
**`hold` is the highest-leverage construct after `semel`** — it collapses 62 + 10 + 9
sites and unblocks the runtime extraction. §19.3 names the prologue/epilogue seam as
the prerequisite and its stated blocker has expired.
---
## 8. What is not decided and must not be guessed
- The representation of `semel` (§5.1)
- One `hold` or two (§5.2)
- What a declaration binds (§5.3)
- The missing faculty (§5.4)
- Sequencing after `semel` — the ordering criterion decides it, not preference
---
*Recorded 2026-08-17. Everything in §2, §3 and §4 is decided. Everything in §5 is open
and is Will's. Nothing here was inferred from a document that was not read.*
+117
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
# Geometry or Code
**Running list.** Append as decided. Started 2026-08-17.
**The test:** *is this an arbitrary convention, or is it a relation?*
Conventions were agreed by people and could have been otherwise — a RIFF header could
have used a different magic number. Nothing derives them; they must be written down.
Relations are not agreed. Distance is distance. Anything whose answer is *where is this
relative to that* is geometry, and writing it as code is the error the whole effort is
correcting.
**Second test, for the hard cases:** *if I write this as code, am I encoding in
`if`-statements a distinction the geometry was built to hold?* If yes, it's geometry.
---
## Pure geometry
| Thing | Because |
|---|---|
| Meaning | position |
| Grounding / standing | the weight on the edge — a magnitude, not a computation |
| Learning | standing changing over time |
| A gap | low standing |
| Wonder | a gap with a pull weight |
| Type checking | is this position in that region — distance |
| Dispatch | position, not a tag |
| Recall | re-origining at a region; projection, not replay |
| Reasoning | traversal |
| Deduction | containment. There is no procedure |
| Counting | a position, not a loop's output |
| Similarity / difference / residue | subtract |
| Analogy, metaphor, skill transfer | change of basis |
| Negation, sarcasm | reflect an axis |
| Empathy | translate the origin |
| Reframe | rotate the frame |
| A lens | project onto an axis |
| Rhyme | distance in phonetic space |
| Humour | intersection of regions — fart-meaning ∩ funny ∩ form |
| Idiom detection | the whole unit sits farther out than its parts |
| Self | a world-tube — a trajectory through the manifold |
| Consolidation | episodic → semantic promotion |
| Reification | dense regions cohering; runs on the beat, has no caller |
| Cross-cutting concerns | **dissolved** — a hold is a *neighbour*. Adjacency, not tracking. **Implemented 2026-08-17**: a construct declares what runs at a crossing, and it resolves at execution — see the runtime seam. |
| Effects | topology. `reach_out` is bounded by `detect_gap` and `verify` because those are its edges |
| Capability | position relative to a boundary. In C it is already spelled `const` |
| The AST | a projection of geometry into a tree — a surface, not the centre |
| Source code | a surface, like text, audio, image |
## Must be code
| Thing | Because |
|---|---|
| Sensors — mic, camera, file read, socket | the physical touch. I/O is where the world arrives |
| Byte formats — RIFF, PNG chunks, `MThd`, OOXML | arbitrary convention. A committee chose the magic numbers |
| CRC32 polynomial, Adler32, zlib framing | same — agreed constants, derivable from nothing |
| Cosine, distance, the float arithmetic | the machinery that *walks* the geometry is not itself geometry |
| Arena, refcount, allocator | bookkeeping for the **representation**, not for the positions |
| Locks, threads, publication boundary | the hardware is code. **Ordering is not** — see Answered, above. Coordination is required only where state is non-monotone. |
| WAL, page layout, ARIES recovery | durability against a physical device that can lose power |
| Emission — writing C or JS text | the final surface has to be *typed out* by something |
| OS interaction — launchd, spawn, signals | outside the system by definition |
| Device realizers — `el_audio_darwin.m`, `el_capture_darwin.m` | OS frameworks. Correctly already isolated, zero network |
---
## The ones I would have written as code, and was wrong about
Recorded because the error has a pattern and the pattern is the point.
| Thing | What I reached for | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Rhyme | a rhyming dictionary, or an API call | distance between rime tails |
| Fart onomatopoeia | a 30-element string literal | an intersection of three regions |
| "Funny" | a scorer with `if`-statements | a relational neighbourhood grounded in a voice |
| Representation vs description | a hardcoded blacklist containing `raspberry` | falls out of lexicon membership × phonetic comedy |
| Video | a codec, sized as a project | one more surface profile |
| Type checking | a phase between parse and emit | reading a distance that already exists |
| Grounding | a call site, an obligation, a discharge | it has no caller. It just runs |
| N transducers, N realizers | one component per modality | zero of each. Sensors and bases at the skin |
**The pattern:** every one is *encoding in code a distinction the geometry was built to
hold.* The tell is that the code version is a **fixed enumeration** — a list, a table, a
blacklist, a set of branches — and the geometry version is a **measurement**.
If the implementation contains a literal set of the right answers, it is in the wrong
column.
---
## Answered
| Thing | The answer |
|---|---|
| Concurrency | **Ordering is geometric.** Causality is a partial order (Lamport 1978); a total order is an arbitrary extension of it and "cannot be depended on to imply a causal relationship." Programming languages force you to write a total order, so authoring *invents* constraints the problem never had — and every lock, barrier, fence and consensus protocol is apparatus for recovering the partial order destroyed at authoring time. CALM (Hellerstein/Alvaro, proven by Ameloot et al.): a program has a consistent coordination-free implementation **iff it is monotone**. What breaks monotonicity is destructive update. **Coordination is the price of forgetting.** |
| The module system | **Premature — the partition is a filesystem path, not a neighbourhood, and there is no namespacing at all.** `import` is textual inlining (guarded against double inclusion); when a `.elh` header exists the header is inlined instead and symbols resolve at C link time, so linking is real and delegated to C. Two modules defining `helper` emit two C functions into one translation unit. Linking barely survives the *path* partition, so whether it survives a neighbourhood partition cannot yet be asked. |
| Numeric literals | **The numeral is convention; the number is a position — and a bare `3` is a MAGNITUDE WITH NO AXIS.** `int_to_str` was already form 1: nothing determines that twelve is written `1` then `2`. But a literal is not a position until something gives it a direction, which is why `3.days` needs a calendar. Measured consequence: `Duration + Int` was refused ("an Int carries no unit") while `Instant + Int` compiled to raw `(t + 3)` and reported clean — silently moving a point by an unspecified amount. The rule was simply never written. Now: `t + 3` is refused, `t + 1.hour` is accepted, because `.hour` supplies the axis. |
| Parsing | **A grammar is a basis; parsing is transduction onto it.** The lexeme→token map is convention (`fn` could have been `def`); shape recognition is a region; the byte traversal is irreducible, like every other traversal. Three things favour *region* for the act: ambiguity (`a * b` needs context — a grammar resolves it with the lexer hack, a region by neighbourhood), error recovery (nearest-match is free), and precedence, which is ordering along an axis with a conventional parameter. **But the SHOULD gate refuses the obvious move:** the keyword table stays code, because the set is closed by the language definition and the lexer runs before the program is understood, so a program can never declare its own keywords. Externalising it costs I/O per compile for zero flexibility — the same verdict as `is_digit` in ASCII. What was actually wrong: 5 of 46 keywords were consumed by nothing, and using one silently miscompiled. |
| Error handling | **`grounded: false` covers not-knowing; it does not cover failed.** Standing is a *signed* component: `> 0` supported, `= 0` unknown, `< 0` contradicted. Not-known and known-false are opposite directions on one axis and a boolean cannot tell them apart. `inhibitory` as an int32 flag is that sign wearing a boolean. |
## Fourth proof form
**4 — ADVERSARIAL EXACTNESS.** Where approximation is a break, geometry is
excluded. A cryptographic hash is a *deliberately structure-destroying* map:
near inputs land at maximally uncorrelated outputs. Geometry is the claim that
near things stay near — a manifold that approximated SHA-256 would *be* a break
of SHA-256. Signature verification is the same: 0.99-valid is invalid. And
X25519 **is** geometry, a group on an elliptic curve, which is precisely why it
must be code: its security is the hardness of moving in that geometry.
**Form 1 no longer survives as a verdict.** Every row it justified turned out to
be a *basis*, not a capability. RFC 8259 fixes where the commas go — that is a
surface, and projecting onto a surface is geometry. A convention describes the
basis you project onto; it never describes an act.
+59
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# v1 — Experiments
Every change to El on `iteration-1` was produced by one loop, run repeatedly:
```
Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma → repeat
```
- **Ishikawa** — name the root cause, not the symptom. *Why is this table here?*
never *why is this table ugly?*
- **Scientific method** — state a hypothesis, **commit predictions before
running**, then run it in an isolated worktree and grade every prediction
including the ones that failed.
- **Six Sigma** — eliminate the defect *class*, then add a control so it cannot
silently return.
## The organising finding
**Predictions that came back FALSE were worth more than the ones that held.**
Nineteen cycles, sixty-one predictions. The eleven that failed produced every
significant result:
| Failed prediction | What it found |
|---|---|
| "the arity table has drifted from the header" | Zero drift — but **110 functions had no entry at all**. The table was not wrong, it was 40% incomplete. |
| "codegen drops below baseline" (×4) | The **traversal is irreducible**. Walking an AST to find calls does not move no matter who decides. Only the rule and the judgment leave. |
| "guards cannot refuse through the seam" | One line, and refusal works. Six compile-time kinds were unnecessary. |
| "C forbids the struct redefinition" | C allows shadowing — and a *different* defect surfaced: an exit injection emitted with an empty target. |
| "routing el_bin_lookup through the gate fixes the SIGSEGV" | It did not. The **fallback** was the hazard: `strlen()` on an integer. I would have shipped the wrong fix and called it verified. |
A prediction that only ever confirms is a demonstration, not a test. One cycle
was run **without** committing predictions first — `async-half-expressible`
and it produced a rigged result: `pthread_join` immediately after
`pthread_create`, with the word `DEFERRED` printed by the test itself. It had to
be discarded and re-run.
## Layout
```
cycles/ one file per loop, numbered in order, named for the DEFECT
findings/ what the cycles produced, cross-cut by kind
```
## Scoreboard
```
cycles run 19
predictions committed 61
predictions FALSE 11 ← the useful ones
silent miscompilations found 4
security-relevant defects 2
architecture questions closed 5
defects in my own measurement 4
```
Every cycle verified the same three things before landing: the compiler
self-hosts byte-identically (gen2 == gen3), the native suite passes, and the
integration harnesses pass. A cycle that could not show all three did not land.
+26
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
# Cycles
Each is one `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop, run in an isolated
worktree so a wrong answer cost nothing. Named for the **defect**, not the fix.
| # | Cycle | Root cause | Predictions | Landed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | [constructs-have-nowhere-to-be](01-constructs-have-nowhere-to-be.md) | a construct had nothing to BE, so its meaning lived in the emitter | 3/3 | yes |
| 02 | [a-construct-cannot-refuse](02-a-construct-cannot-refuse.md) | injection discards the target's result; no form said no | 4/4 | yes |
| 03 | [the-wrapper-was-conditional](03-the-wrapper-was-conditional.md) | exit injection needed compile-time knowledge only because the wrapper was conditional | 3/4 | yes |
| 04 | [c-has-no-closure-syntax](04-c-has-no-closure-syntax.md) | "C has no closures" taken as a fact about what is possible | 5/7 | yes |
| 05 | [the-emitter-discards-what-it-knows](05-the-emitter-discards-what-it-knows.md) | codegen sees every construct relation and throws it away | 5/5 | branch |
| 06 | [the-crossing-resolves-at-emission](06-the-crossing-resolves-at-emission.md) | the binary has no table to consult | 3/4 | yes |
| 07 | [invocation-is-not-composable](07-invocation-is-not-composable.md) | the wrapper called the target directly | 5/5 | yes |
| 08 | [the-emitter-adjudicates](08-the-emitter-adjudicates.md) | a prohibition had nowhere to live but a `#error` | 4/5 | yes |
| 09 | [policy-inside-the-compiler](09-policy-inside-the-compiler.md) | a program cannot declare its own restrictions, so the tier policy was compiled in | 4/5 | yes |
| 10 | [a-second-copy-of-the-header](10-a-second-copy-of-the-header.md) | builtin arity hand-maintained beside `el_runtime.h` | 4/5 | yes |
| 11 | [one-type-erases-the-return](11-one-type-erases-the-return.md) | `el_val_t` means the header cannot say `now()` returns an Instant | 4/5 | yes |
| 12 | [judgment-lives-with-knowledge](12-judgment-lives-with-knowledge.md) | the emitter knows the types, so it also judged them | 5/5 | yes |
| 13 | [thirty-five-return-types](13-thirty-five-return-types.md) | `is_int_call` hardcoded what drives `+` dispatch | 6/6 | yes |
| 14 | [keywords-that-reserve-nothing](14-keywords-that-reserve-nothing.md) | 5 of 46 keywords consumed by no path | 6/6 | yes |
| 15 | [no-namespacing-at-all](15-no-namespacing-at-all.md) | `import` is textual inlining; every name is global | 4/4 | yes |
| 16 | [tokens-carry-no-position](16-tokens-carry-no-position.md) | a token was `(kind, value)`, so no diagnostic could name a place | 6/6 | yes |
| 17 | [annotations-are-never-checked](17-annotations-are-never-checked.md) | the annotation feeds dispatch and is never verified | 6/6 | branch |
| 18 | [async-half-expressible](18-async-half-expressible.md) | **first attempt was DOGMA** — no predictions, rigged test | 4/4 (2nd) | branch |
| 19 | [a-convention-is-not-a-gate](19-a-convention-is-not-a-gate.md) | `looks_like_heap_obj` is static, so every type re-derives it | 6/7 | yes |
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
# constructs have nowhere to be
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `5718943`
```
let a construct declare its own meaning instead of the emitter knowing it
codegen called fn_has_decorator for exactly three names — manager, accessor,
route. Twelve others parsed, attached as {name,args}, and compiled to nothing,
including four that look like protection: @authenticate (6 uses), @authorize
(3), @rate_limit (3), @validate (2). The cause was not that the branches were
untidy. A construct had nothing to BE, so its meaning had nowhere to live
except the emitter, and every construct was therefore a compiler edit.
A name -> injection table would have moved the enumeration twenty lines up
without removing it. So the construct now carries its own meaning:
@decorator("injects_at_entry", "engram_boundary_beat")
fn audited() {}
@audited
fn risky_op() -> Int { ... } // gets the beat, attributed to "audited"
scan_declared_decorators is a token-level pre-pass beside scan_routes, forced
by streaming codegen having no whole-program AST. manager and accessor are
seeded as the compiled-in core — the fixedSelf shape from substrate.go: a
complete fallback exists, declaration is enrichment.
This is the injection half of the seam only. The prohibition half (@manager's
#error on dharma_emit) stays hardcoded, because "which calls may appear inside
this boundary" is a query over program structure and there is nothing yet to
ask.
Verified three ways: emitted C for existing @manager/@accessor code is
byte-identical to the hardcoded path; a construct with a name the compiler has
never heard of injects correctly; the compiler self-hosts byte-identically.
90/90 native compiler tests pass.
```
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# a construct cannot refuse
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `60737b0`
```
let a construct refuse, not only observe
@authenticate (6 uses), @authorize (3), @rate_limit (3) and @validate (2)
parsed, attached, and compiled to nothing. Fourteen applications that read as
protection and emitted no instruction — a function decorated @authenticate
compiled byte-identically to an undecorated one.
The missing capability was not authentication. It was that a construct could
observe a boundary but never refuse one. injects_at_entry discards the target's
result; there was no form in which a construct could say no.
@decorator("guards_at_entry", "my_auth")
fn authenticate() {}
@authenticate
@authorize
fn handler() -> String { ... }
emits, at entry:
{ el_val_t __g = my_auth(EL_STR("handler"), EL_STR("authenticate")); if (__g) return __g; }
{ el_val_t __g = my_roles(EL_STR("handler"), EL_STR("authorize")); if (__g) return __g; }
Guards precede injections because a refused call must not report a crossing,
and every guard runs where the topmost injecting construct wins — refusal is
not a role, so it does not follow the role convention.
The compiler still knows nothing about auth. The program points the construct
at its own function, which is where that decision belongs.
Verified: existing @manager/@accessor output byte-identical, compiler
self-hosts byte-identically, guards stack in declaration order and emit before
the beat. 94/94 native compiler tests pass.
```
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
# the wrapper was conditional
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `4f7568b`
```
give a construct its after-crossing face, and let constructs compose
§6 records 62 persist-after-mutate sites, 10 auth-per-route, and
index-after-append that failed at 9 of 9 — every one an obligation at a
crossing that decayed into "remember to do this afterwards." An obligation a
human must remember is not an obligation, and the 9-of-9 figure is what that
costs.
@decorator("injects_at_exit", "persist_now")
fn durable() {}
The body moves into a static helper and the visible fn becomes a wrapper, so
EARLY RETURNS pass through the exit injection. Emitting it only before the
fall-through return would have silently missed every early return — the exact
failure class this seam exists to remove. Fns with no exit construct emit
byte-identically to before.
Three independent constructs now compose on one fn, none known to the compiler:
el_val_t mutate(el_val_t k) {
{ el_val_t __g = my_auth(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("authenticate")); if (__g) return __g; }
engram_boundary_beat(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("manager"));
el_val_t __r = __el_body_mutate(k);
persist_now(EL_STR("mutate"), EL_STR("durable"), __r);
return __r;
}
Guard, then entry, then body, then exit. §5.2 asked whether `hold` is one
construct or two; the implementation answers one construct with two faces,
selected by declared kind rather than by two mechanisms.
Verified: existing output byte-identical, compiler self-hosts byte-identically,
early returns pass through the exit, ordering holds under composition. 98/98
native compiler tests pass.
```
## Record — `285166c`
```
EXPERIMENT: emit the wrapper unconditionally, so exit binds at runtime too
ISHIKAWA: why did exit injection still need compile-time knowledge? Because the
body-helper wrapper was only emitted when codegen already knew an exit
construct existed. The wrapper being conditional was the cause, not the wrapper
being necessary.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 exit becomes runtime-bindable TRUE returns 14, bound
after the build
P2 codegen shrinks TRUE 5094 -> 5044
P3 cost 5-15% from a call frame on every fn FALSE 0.37s -> 0.38s, ~3%
P4 fixpoint holds TRUE
Every fn now gets a body helper and a wrapper. It has to be unconditional:
early returns must route through something for an exit construct to observe
them, and codegen cannot know which fns will be bound after the binary exists.
Removed with the machinery: declare_exit, decorator_exit, cg_exit_target,
cg_exit_construct, and the injects_at_exit scanner branch.
Two controls failed and were rewritten rather than repaired --
no-exit-construct-emits-no-wrapper asserted the optimisation this removes, so
it is now inverted. The integration harness gained a seventh assertion: an exit
construct declared after the build replaces the result.
99/99 native, 7/7 integration, fixpoint gen2==gen3.
```
## Record — `b40754f`
```
land unconditional wrapper: exit crossings resolve at runtime
```
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# c has no closure syntax
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `2bed848`
```
EXPERIMENT: hand the construct the body as a real closure
ROOT CAUSE of the weaker design: "C has no closures" was taken as a fact about
what is possible. It is a fact about one grammar. Every C++ lambda, every Go
closure, every Rust closure compiles to a struct of captured values plus a
function pointer -- which is what is emitted here. Codegen emits C; it is not
written in C's syntax, and the distinction is the whole difference between a
construct that can only decide whether to repeat and one that controls
invocation.
It would also have crippled the JS backend, which has closures natively, for a
limit that applies only to the C one.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
1 env struct + thunk taking void* TRUE
2 fails to compile: struct redefinition FALSE -- C allows the
inner declaration to shadow. Prediction wrong; C is more permissive than
assumed. A different real defect surfaced instead: a wrap with no exit
construct emitted `(EL_STR("f"), EL_STR(""), __r);` -- a call to an empty
target -- because has_exit was reused as "needs a wrapper" and the exit line
was emitted unconditionally. Fixed.
3 compiles when the target is declared in El FALSE -- and this is
the root cause worth keeping: El has ONE type, el_val_t = int64_t. El's type
system cannot describe a callable, so `extern fn` and the real signature
cannot be made to agree in El's own vocabulary. The fix is not a cast:
codegen DEFINES the wrap calling convention, so codegen emits the extern
declaration. The convention is not El-expressible; it is emitted.
4 target controls invocation, 0..N times TRUE
5 existing @manager output byte-identical TRUE
6 compiler fixpoint holds TRUE
7 emitting the convention makes it compile TRUE
MEASURED
base(5) wrapped by a target that invokes the body twice and sums -> 10
never_runs(5) wrapped by a target that never invokes it -> 999
Neither is expressible by "decide whether to repeat". This supersedes the
repeats_body experiment on experiment/repeats-body, which was built around the
mistaken limit.
```
## Record — `7d01608`
```
land wraps_body: a construct controls invocation
Proven on experiment/wraps-body (2bed848): base(5) wrapped by a target that
invokes the body twice returns 10; a target that never invokes it returns 999.
Neither is expressible by deciding whether to repeat.
Root cause it corrected: 'C has no closures' is a fact about one grammar, not
about what can be emitted. And El's single type (el_val_t = int64_t) cannot
describe a callable, so codegen emits the calling convention rather than asking
El's type system for something it structurally cannot say.
```
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# the emitter discards what it knows
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `a5af871`
```
EXPERIMENT: let the compiler write down what it already knows
HYPOTHESIS: attribution is redundant for static structure. Codegen sees every
construct-to-function relation at emission time and discards it, so the only
way to learn the structure back is to run the program and read what it
reported. That is instrumentation compensating for erasure.
PREDICTIONS, committed before running:
1 derivable at compile time with no runtime call expected TRUE
2 complete for guards and exits (invisible today) expected TRUE
3 answers it for code that has never executed expected TRUE
4 deterministic expected TRUE
5 makes the entry beat redundant expected FALSE
RESULT: 5/5 as predicted. From a program that was never executed:
authenticate guards_at_entry login my_auth
durable injects_at_exit save persist_now
authenticate guards_at_entry critical my_auth
durable injects_at_exit critical persist_now
manager injects_at_entry critical engram_boundary_beat
Prediction 5 held: the relation records that a boundary COULD be crossed, the
beat records that it WAS. They are different facts and neither replaces the
other.
CONSEQUENCE, and it undercuts the first pass on iteration-1: construct identity
was available at compile time all along. With relations recorded at build, the
runtime needs only the function name and attribution becomes a join rather than
a payload. The counter-argument is that the payload is self-describing while
the file must be pinned to the artifact or the two drift and attribution is
silently lost — which is the same conclusion as "compile against a manifold
revision and record the revision in the artifact", reached from the other side.
Written to a file rather than the engram on purpose: a compile that consults a
manifold produces different output from identical source at different times.
The file is content-addressed; the engram ingests it. Determinism preserved,
mechanism proven.
```
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# the crossing resolves at emission
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `35b07ba`
```
EXPERIMENT: resolve the crossing at execution, not at emission
HYPOTHESIS (Will's): a compiler whose one compiled mechanism is extending the
LANGUAGE — not the compiler — can compose without recompilation.
ISHIKAWA — why does a construct require a recompile today?
method codegen inlines the target call into the body
machine the binary has no table to consult
material the declaration lives in source, read at compile time
measurement nothing observes what applied at runtime
root cause the crossing is resolved at EMISSION, not at EXECUTION
CHANGE: codegen emits one unconditional indirection per fn. Which constructs
apply is read from a table that can be written AFTER the binary exists;
targets resolve through dlsym against the running image.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 a construct declared after the build applies TRUE
P2 an unlinked target is skipped, not fatal TRUE
P3 emitting on every fn is measurably slower FALSE — 0.37s -> 0.36s
with 267 indirections and
no bindings. Free unused.
P4 the compiler still self-hosts TRUE (see note)
DEMONSTRATED: an El program with NO decorator in its source, already compiled
and linked, picked up a construct declared afterwards:
$ /tmp/seamrun -> 7
$ echo 'work audited entry audit_entry' > constructs.txt
$ EL_CONSTRUCTS=constructs.txt /tmp/seamrun
AUDIT: work applied by audited
7
P4 note: my first fixpoint test was wrong, not the code. I compared gen1 to
gen2, which must differ whenever codegen's output changes. gen2 == gen3, 267
seam sites, stable.
MEASURED COST, and the root cause was not where I looked
0 bindings 0.36s vs 0.37s baseline free
2 bindings, dlsym per call 2.45s 6.6x
2 bindings, resolved once 0.69s 3.5x recovered
The table scan was never the cost. dlsym walks the dynamic symbol table on
every call. Resolve once and cache — which is the smallest form of what
salience does for memory: what is hot stays resolved. The 0.69s residual is
audit_entry's own printf on two of the compiler's hottest functions, not seam
overhead.
CONSEQUENCE: the five compile-time declaration kinds on iteration-1 are a
compile-time specialisation of something that resolves at runtime. They are not
wrong, but they are not the mechanism — the mechanism is one indirection, and a
kind is data.
```
## Record — `886626a`
```
seam refusal + control tests: a runtime binding can short-circuit
Prediction 3 was FALSE. I expected refusal to be impossible through the seam
because the entry indirection discarded its return. One line:
{ el_val_t __s = el_seam_run(EL_STR(f), 0, 0); if (__s) return __s; }
work() returns 7; bound to a refusing construct AFTER the build it returns 42.
So three of the five compile-time kinds are runtime-bindable: entry injection,
exit injection, and refusal. wraps_body needs invocation control and
prohibits_outside is compile-time by nature.
104/104 native compiler tests pass.
```
## Record — `28d19da`
```
strip the compile-time machinery the seam replaces
PREDICTION: codegen.el drops below 4661, its size before any of these passes.
RESULT: FALSE. 5157 -> 5096. Still +435 over baseline.
injects_at_entry collapsed into the seam removed
guards_at_entry collapsed into the seam removed
injects_at_exit needs the body-helper wrapper STRUCTURAL
wraps_body needs the closure + wrapper structural
prohibits_outside a #error cannot be emitted at runtime
The wrapper is not a consequence of compile-time resolution. Early returns must
be routed through something no matter when the target is resolved, so exit
injection was never going to collapse. I predicted it would because I had
conflated "resolved late" with "emitted less".
What did collapse is entry injection and refusal -- 61 lines of compiler
replaced by one refusable indirection, with the capability now bindable after
the binary exists.
8 tests fail, and they are exactly the 8 controls for compile-time entry
injection and guards. No unrelated breakage: the controls reported precisely
what moved. They assert emission of something that now happens at runtime, so
they need rewriting as integration tests -- which the framework does not
currently support, because runtime binding needs a built binary and an
environment, not compile_capture.
Verified after the strip: fixpoint gen2==gen3, observation and refusal both
work through the seam with the compiler knowing nothing about either.
```
## Record — `8bbb750`
```
control the claim that cannot be unit tested
The seam's whole claim is that a construct declared AFTER a binary exists
applies to that already-built program. compile_capture only sees emitted text,
so it structurally cannot check this: it needs a built binary, a linked target,
and an environment. Verified by hand until now, which is the standing problem
this session has been about.
tests/integration/seam_binding.sh builds a probe from El source containing no
construct at all, links a target that El never references, and asserts:
ok unbound program is unaffected
ok a construct declared AFTER the build applies
ok a construct declared after the build can REFUSE
ok an unlinked target is skipped, not fatal
ok a binding for a different fn does not fire
ok two constructs compose on one crossing
6 assertions, 6 passed, 0 failed
The eight controls that failed after the strip were replaced, not repaired.
They asserted compile-time emission of capability that moved to runtime;
contorting them would have kept an assertion whose subject no longer exists.
Three took their place, asserting the emitted shape, and the behaviour they
used to cover is now the integration harness's job -- which is the honest
division, since the shape and the behaviour are no longer the same fact.
99/99 native compiler tests pass. Fixpoint holds.
```
## Record — `24f7fb5`
```
land the runtime seam: resolve the crossing at execution
Five compile-time passes added 491 lines to the thing that was supposed to stop
growing. The seam is ~55 lines of C and one line of emission, and it does at
runtime what three of those five kinds did at compile time -- for programs that
are already built.
a construct declared AFTER the binary exists applies to it
free when unused: 0.36s vs 0.37s baseline across 267 indirections
dlsym was the cost, not the table scan; resolve-once recovered 3.5x
refusal works, composition works, unlinked targets are skipped not fatal
injects_at_exit and wraps_body do NOT collapse: early returns must route
through the body-helper wrapper regardless of when the target is resolved. The
wrapper is structural, which I had wrong. prohibits_outside cannot move at all
-- a #error has no runtime.
Controls: 99/99 native compiler tests, plus tests/integration/seam_binding.sh
(6/6) for the claim compile_capture structurally cannot see.
```
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
# invocation is not composable
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `bc2f26d`
```
EXPERIMENT: invocation control resolves at runtime
ISHIKAWA: why did wraps_body need compile-time knowledge? Because the wrapper
called the target directly. If the wrapper calls through the seam instead, the
seam can call the body itself, and a construct bound after the build decides
how and whether to invoke it.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 wrap becomes runtime-bindable TRUE body x3 -> 21,
never invoked -> 111
P2 codegen shrinks TRUE 5042 -> 4977
P3 cost 5-10% from an indirect call on every fn TRUE 0.36s -> 0.39s, ~8%
P4 zero-param fns break on the empty struct TRUE empty struct is a GNU
extension, empty init
is C23. Fixed with a
char field.
P5 fixpoint holds TRUE
PROCESS FAILURE worth recording: my first patch silently did not apply because
I dropped the assert on the string replacement. The build then failed with
"undeclared identifier __thunk_noargs", which I nearly attributed to the
empty-struct prediction. The guard that would have caught it existed and I
removed it -- the same shape as every other defect found tonight.
Removed: declare_wrap, decorator_wrap, cg_wrap_target, cg_wrap_construct,
params_to_call_args, and the wraps_body scanner branch.
prohibits_outside is now the ONLY construct kind left at compile time, and it
cannot move: a #error has no runtime.
```
## Record — `c04d68f`
```
land runtime invocation control: only prohibition remains compiled
```
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# the emitter adjudicates
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `c741cfe`
```
EXPERIMENT: prohibition becomes a query over emitted relations
I said prohibition could not move because "a #error has no runtime". That
conflated two separable things: WHEN a violation is detected (build time --
correct, and unchanged) and WHERE the rule and the checker live (the compiler
-- assumed).
A prohibition is a containment relation over the call graph. So codegen now
records what it saw:
sneaky calls raw_sql
allowed calls raw_sql
allowed calls @repository
repository calls prohibits:raw_sql
and tools/check/prohibitions.sh decides, at build time, outside the compiler.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 codegen can emit the call graph it already walks TRUE
P2 the check becomes a query outside the compiler TRUE
P3 all prohibition decisions leave codegen TRUE zero #errors now
P4 violations still caught at build time TRUE exit=1
P5 codegen drops below the 4661 baseline FALSE 4962, +301
P5 is the finding. The TRAVERSAL is irreducible -- you must walk the AST to
find calls, and those ~120 lines do not move no matter who decides. What is not
irreducible is the rule (which names) or the decision (#error). Those left. I
predicted the whole 223 lines would go because I had not separated walking from
adjudicating.
Still compiled, and measured rather than assumed: the capability-tier system
(cap_check_call, is_self_formation_call, is_dharma_call, is_llm_call,
cap_record_violation, emit_cap_violations) is 76 lines of the same shape --
prohibits_WITHIN rather than prohibits_outside, so the checker needs the
opposite polarity to absorb it.
98/98 native, 4/4 prohibition_query.sh, 7/7 seam_binding.sh, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `60c07ad`
```
land prohibition-as-query: the emitter records, it no longer adjudicates
```
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# policy inside the compiler
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `c2d9596`
```
EXPERIMENT: the capability tier becomes shipped policy plus a query
Capability differs from prohibits_outside in one way that matters: a utility
program cannot be trusted to declare its own restrictions, because it would
declare none. So the policy comes from OUTSIDE the program -- it ships with the
language as data, editable without a compiler release.
tools/check/capabilities.rel 18 names that were string literals in codegen
tools/check/capabilities.sh the query that decides
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 codegen emits kind + call graph, drops the 4 name tests TRUE zero #errors
P2 the 18 literals become a data file TRUE
P3 the checker catches capability violations TRUE exit=1
P4 codegen drops ~76 lines TRUE 4963 -> 4881
P5 below the 4661 baseline FALSE ~+230
TWO DEFECTS THE HARNESS FOUND THAT READING WOULD NOT HAVE
1. Calls inside main became invisible. cg_fn returns early for main -- C
provides its own -- so hooking the recording there left every call in main
unrecorded: a blind spot exactly where a program does its work. The old
cap_check_call ran from cg_expr and did see main. Moved the recording to
cg_expr.
2. Caller attribution was stale. __cg_current_fn kept whatever cg_fn set last,
so a violation in main was reported against the previously emitted function.
The test still PASSED, because the violation was detected -- only the name
was wrong, and a diagnostic naming the wrong fn is worse than none. Fixed at
all three main-emission sites; the first patch missed two because the live
path is codegen_streaming.
98/98 native, 7/7 + 4/4 + 5/5 integration, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `29f78f9`
```
land capability-as-policy: eighteen literals become a data file
```
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
# a second copy of the header
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `9cc6040`
```
EXPERIMENT: derive arity from the runtime's own declarations
codegen.el carried builtin_arity(): 344 lines, 300 entries, a hand-maintained
second copy of el_runtime.h.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 the table duplicates the header TRUE 243 shared names
P2 they have already drifted FALSE ZERO drift. The
duplicate had been
maintained correctly.
P3 codegen can emit call-arity relations TRUE
P4 the check becomes a query against the header TRUE
P5 codegen drops to roughly baseline TRUE 4903 -> 4512,
149 BELOW the 4661
it started at
P2 being false is the better result: the table was not WRONG, it was
INCOMPLETE. 110 functions the runtime declares had no entry, so calling them
with the wrong argument count produced no El-level diagnostic at all. Measured:
the old compiler reports 0 arity errors for __http_do_map_to_file(1); the query
reports "takes 5 arguments, called with 1".
Deriving from the header fixes coverage AND makes drift impossible by
construction. 503 signatures, versus 300 entries maintained by hand.
THREE DEFECTS IN MY OWN CHECKER, each found by running it rather than reading it
1. El names and C names differ -- `println` is `__println`. 60 of 500 decls
carry the prefix and codegen owns the mapping; the old table carried both
keys. One rule covers all 60.
2. Multi-line declarations parsed as zero params, so the checker reported
"takes 0" for a function taking 5. A diagnostic with the wrong number in it
is worse than none -- the same shape as the stale caller attribution in the
previous pass.
3. Fixing (2) by joining lines dropped 500 signatures to 334, because a
declaration preceded by a comment no longer started its record. Comments
are stripped first now.
98/98 native, 5/5 arity_query.sh, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `d9e301b`
```
land arity-from-header: the runtime declares its own surface
```
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
# one type erases the return
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `d2d89fc`
```
EXPERIMENT: temporal types as data — and the pass that GREW the compiler
This block is structurally unlike the previous four. It does not only
adjudicate, it DISPATCHES: Instant + Duration must become el_instant_add_dur,
LocalDate + Duration must become el_local_date_add_dur. The emitted C depends on
the type answer, so it cannot move to a post-hoc query. Selecting which call to
emit is an emitter's actual job.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 the block conflates dispatch with adjudication TRUE
P2 adjudication can move, dispatch cannot TRUE
P3 this pass shrinks codegen far less than the last TRUE, and worse:
4513 -> 4537, it GREW
by 24 lines
P4 the rules are affine algebra, closed by construction TRUE
P5 no type propagation -- name tracking plus a
hardcoded list of which builtins return which type TRUE, 19 names
P3 is the honest result and it is not spun: moving 19 names into a data file
cost more lines than it saved, because a generic loader is larger than the
enumeration it replaces. The win is not line count. It is that adding a 20th
temporal builtin is now a one-line edit to signatures.rel instead of a compiler
change, and that the data is inspectable.
WHY THE HEADER CANNOT SUPPLY THIS, unlike arity: el_runtime.h declares every
builtin as returning el_val_t, because El has ONE type. That single type is why
the whole seam is cheap and it is exactly why the C boundary cannot say that
now() returns an Instant while unix_seconds() returns an Int. The El-level type
is real and the boundary erases it.
INCOMPLETE, and stated rather than hidden: P2 said adjudication could move to a
query. It has NOT. Violations still emit TIME_TYPE_ERROR inline from the
emitter. Only the type DATA moved. Moving the adjudication needs the operand
types recorded as relations, which is a further pass.
98/98 native, 4/4 temporal_signatures.sh, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `e01e079`
```
land temporal signatures as data: the type table leaves, the dispatch stays
```
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
# judgment lives with knowledge
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `e8e25a0`
```
EXPERIMENT: temporal adjudication moves out; the placeholder stays
The previous pass moved the type DATA and left the judgment inline, which I
stated rather than hid. This finishes it.
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 codegen can emit operand-type relations TRUE
"main calls temporal:instant_plus_instant"
P2 the affine rules are a small closed set as data TRUE 6 rules
P3 violations still caught at build time TRUE exit=1
P4 the reporter leaves codegen TRUE 4538 -> 4507
P5 the TIME_TYPE_ERROR placeholder must STAY TRUE
P5 is the boundary of this whole approach. The emitter has to emit SOMETHING
for an illegal expression -- it cannot emit nothing and it cannot decide what
the program meant. So the placeholder is irreducible in the same way the AST
traversal was: what moved is the judgment and the wording, not the fact that
something must be written.
The rules are affine algebra and the set is closed because there are only two
kinds of thing. An Instant is a POINT, a Duration is a DISPLACEMENT: add a
displacement to a point, subtract two points for a displacement, combine
displacements. Nothing else is meaningful, which is why the enumeration in
temporal.rel cannot grow the way an allowlist does.
A defect in my own checker, found by running it: the .rel file uses aligned
columns and my awk assumed a single space, so the message came out with the
rule key still prefixed. Same class as the multi-line header parse in the arity
pass -- formatting assumptions that only fail when you look at the output.
98/98 native, 6/6 temporal_query.sh, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `50425f3`
```
land temporal adjudication as a query: the emitter records, the rules are data
```
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# thirty five return types
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `cbef1c1`
```
EXPERIMENT: Int return types as data — and the bug that fell out
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 is_int_call's 35 hardcoded names move to data TRUE
P2 is_int_name stays -- it is annotation propagation TRUE
P3 the dispatch stays -- it is emission TRUE
P4 codegen shrinks ~40 lines TRUE 4507 -> 4469
P5 the design doc's characterisation is WRONG TRUE
P6 the moved data also fixes the bug it exposed TRUE
P5 CORRECTS THE RECORD. el-language-design.md and geometry-vs-code.md both cite
"== lowering to str_eq unless both operand names are in a hardcoded int-name
set -- a literal list of variable names treated as integers" as the paradigm
defect. It is not one. __int_names is populated from TYPE ANNOTATIONS
(param["type"] == "Int"), which is primitive but legitimate type propagation.
The actual defect was is_int_call: 35 hardcoded builtin return types, the same
shape as the temporal 19.
P6 IS A LIVE CORRECTNESS BUG, PRE-EXISTING, NOW FIXED
let a = str_len("hello") // no annotation
let b = str_len("hi")
let c = a + b // -> el_str_concat(a, b) on two integers
Verified identical on the pre-change compiler, so not a regression. It compiled
clean, ran, and printed NOTHING where it should print 7. No error at any layer.
The repair is three lines: an unannotated let takes its type from what the
initialiser returns. The return types were already required for dispatch and
were simply never consulted at the binding site. Moving them into data is what
made the gap visible -- reading the code for eight hours did not.
98/98 native + 2 new, 31/31 integration, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `505e5e7`
```
land int signatures, and repair a silent miscompilation they exposed
```
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
# keywords that reserve nothing
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `0143cc4`
```
ANSWER: is a grammar a convention, or a region?
Both, at different layers -- and it is the same split as serialization: the
convention is the BASIS, never the ACT.
lexeme -> token `fn` means function-start because someone said so CONVENTION
shape recognition given tokens, which construct is this REGION
source -> structure parsing is transduction onto that basis GEOMETRY
byte traversal something must read them in order IRREDUCIBLE
Three things push the ACT toward region rather than convention: ambiguity
(a * b needs context; a grammar resolves it with the lexer hack, a region by
neighbourhood), error recovery (nearest-region is free), and precedence, which
is ordering along an axis with a conventional parameter.
AND THE SHOULD GATE SAYS NO TO THE OBVIOUS MOVE
Every other table this session moved to data. This one stays code. The keyword
set is CLOSED by the language definition -- it does not leak the way an
allowlist does -- and the lexer runs before the program is understood, so a
program can never declare its own keywords. Externalising it costs file I/O on
every compile and buys nothing. Same verdict as is_digit in ASCII.
WHAT WAS ACTUALLY WRONG: five of 46 keywords were consumed by no parser or
codegen path. sealed, activate, seed, protocol, impl. Each stole an identifier
from users for nothing.
SECOND SILENT MISCOMPILATION OF THE DAY. Using one did not fail to parse:
let seed = 42
let impl = seed + 1
compiled CLEAN -- zero cc errors -- and printed 0 instead of 44. No diagnostic
at any layer. Fixed by removing the five.
A DEFECT IN MY OWN MEASUREMENT, caught before it did damage: my first pass
checked only parser.el and reported `test` as inert too. codegen consumes it at
4135 for --test mode, and the tree has 408 uses. Removing it would have broken
every test in the suite. The measurement was re-run across all four consumers.
100/100 native + 2 new, 31/31 integration, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `067dd40`
```
answer the parsing question: a grammar is a basis, and five keywords reserved nothing
```
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# no namespacing at all
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `79f6cb7`
```
ANSWER: if the partition is a neighbourhood, does linking survive?
The question is premature, and measuring says why. El's partition is a
FILESYSTEM PATH, not a neighbourhood, and there is no namespacing at all.
MEASURED
import is textual inlining (resolve_imports), guarded against double
inclusion by a __elc_imp__:<path> state key
when a .elh header exists the header is inlined instead and the .el is marked
seen, so symbols resolve at C link time -- so linking IS real, delegated to C
two modules defining `helper` emit two C functions into one translation unit
So linking barely survives the PATH partition. Whether it survives a
neighbourhood partition cannot be asked yet.
A DIAGNOSTIC REGRESSION I CAUSED, found by asking this question. cc does catch
the collision, but reports:
error: redefinition of '__el_body_helper'
error: redefinition of '__env_helper'
error: redefinition of '__thunk_helper'
error: redefinition of 'helper'
The user's own function is FOURTH. The first three are generated symbols
introduced by the unconditional-wrapper pass earlier today -- before it, there
was one clear message. Repaired by catching the collision at El level instead:
duplicate definition: 'helper' is defined 2 times — El has no namespacing,
so imported modules share one global scope
LIMIT, stated rather than hidden: textual inlining destroys file provenance. By
the time codegen runs there is one source string, so the message can say WHICH
name collides but not which files. Naming a.el and b.el needs provenance
threaded through resolve_imports.
104/104 native, 4/4 definitions_query.sh, the compiler itself reports clean,
fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `f23cb2b`
```
answer the module question: the partition is a path, and there is no namespacing
```
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# tokens carry no position
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `6c975b1`
```
thread provenance through resolve_imports
The module question ended with a limit: textual inlining destroys file
provenance, so a duplicate-definition message could name the symbol but not the
files. Threading it exposed a bigger absence first.
TOKENS HAD NO POSITION AT ALL. A token was a flat (kind, value) pair, so NO
diagnostic in El could name a place -- every error named a symbol and never a
line. That is the prerequisite the module question was resting on.
THE CHAIN, end to end
lexer counts newlines; tok_append mints (kind, value, line)
parser stride 2 -> 3; tok_line added; FnDef carries its line
codegen records <fn> defines_at:<line>
resolve_imports publishes <file> spans <start> <end> for the combined source
checker maps a combined line back to file:line-within-that-file
duplicate definition: 'helper' is defined 2 times — El has no namespacing,
so imported modules share one global scope
/tmp/modtest/a.el:1
/tmp/modtest/b.el:1
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 15 stride sites, encapsulated in tok_kind/tok_value TRUE, but see below
P2 adding a line field is mechanical TRUE
P3 the lexer must count newlines TRUE
P4 resolve_imports can record per-file line ranges TRUE
P5 the message can then name both files TRUE
P6 token memory grows TRUE, 25.0 -> 33.9 MB (+36%)
FOUR DEFECTS, EACH FOUND BY RUNNING AND NOT BY READING
1. interp_tokens_append_all walks the token list DIRECTLY with its own copy of
the stride. Gen1 built fine and gen2 emitted corrupt C, because the
compiler's own source uses string interpolation. My search missed it because
I grepped for the variable name `tokens`; it is called `dst`/`result`.
Searching by name instead of by shape -- third time today.
2. tok_count in test_compiler.el carried the stride too. I had scoped the search
to compiler sources and it had escaped into the tests.
3. Nested resolve_imports calls accumulated spans into shared state, so each
republished meaningless line ranges under the parent's name. Making the
buffer local fixed it; guarding the WRITE did not, which is what I tried
first.
4. The first working version reported b.el:3 -- the COMBINED line against a
filename that has no line 3. A file:line that does not match the file is
worse than no line at all.
105/105 native, 37/37 integration, fixpoint ok, compiler self-checks clean.
```
## Record — `cb7289f`
```
thread provenance end to end: a diagnostic can finally name a place
```
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
# annotations are never checked
**Status: verified on `experiment/annotation-checking`, not merged.**
## Ishikawa — why does El silently miscompile?
Three bugs found the same day shared one shape.
```
method type tracked by per-function name sets, fed from annotations
machine el_val_t erases everything at the C boundary
material no propagation through expressions
measurement nothing verifies an annotation against what it annotates
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
root cause El has type ANNOTATIONS but no type CHECKING. The annotation
feeds dispatch and is never itself verified.
```
## Predictions
```
P1 let x: Int = "hello" compiles clean expect TRUE
P2 let s: String = 42 compiles clean expect TRUE
P3 the annotation drives dispatch, unverified expect TRUE
P4 same root cause as all three bugs found today expect TRUE
P5 checking literal-vs-annotation catches both expect TRUE
P6 zero false positives across the compiler's source expect TRUE
```
## Results — 6/6, and worse than a wrong answer
```
let x: Int = "hello"; x + 1 → 4343631981 a string POINTER used as an integer
let s: String = 42; println(s) → nothing address 42 dereferenced as a string
```
The first **leaks a raw memory address into program output**. The second is an
**arbitrary-read primitive** if that integer is ever attacker-influenced.
Verified: 6/6, zero false positives across the compiler's own source, fixpoint
ok, 105/105 native.
## Six Sigma
The emitter only **records** the mismatch; `tools/check/annotations.sh` decides —
consistent with every other check. Literals are checked because they are
unambiguous.
**Incomplete, stated not hidden:** only literals. `let x: Int = some_string_fn()`
still passes, because `signatures.rel` carries Int/Instant/Duration and no
String entries. That is a data gap, not a capability limit — every El function
declares its return type in source and codegen already holds `ret_type` on every
`FnDef`.
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
# async — half expressible, and the cycle that was dogma
**Status: measured on a branch, not merged. Two runs — the first was invalid.**
## The first attempt was DOGMA, not science
I had just finished arguing that `@async` was expressible, then ran something to
confirm it. **No prediction was committed.** The test was rigged in a way that
should have been visible while writing it:
```c
pthread_create(&t,NULL,runner,NULL); pthread_join(t,NULL);
```
`join` immediately after `create` — the caller blocks until the body finishes.
That is a thread round-trip, not deferral. And the test printed the word
`DEFERRED` itself: I wrote the conclusion into the output and read it back.
```
Ishikawa on the rigged test
method ran after concluding, not to decide
machine nothing forces a prediction before execution
material the assertion was written into the output string
measurement no falsification criterion existed, so nothing could fail
root cause the test was authored by the party holding the conclusion,
with no commitment made before it ran
```
Discarded and re-run properly.
## Second run — predictions committed first
```
P1 the caller proceeds while the body runs expect TRUE
P2 interleaving is observable in timestamps expect TRUE
P3 the result cannot be retrieved — one 64-bit slot, no
future type, so the wrap either blocks or returns
something that is not the result expect TRUE
P4 therefore HALF expressible: fire-and-forget yes, await no expect TRUE
```
## Results — 4/4
```
[ 18 us] wrap RETURNS to caller
[ 29 us] body START
caller continues, got 0
[ 50176 us] body END (computed 42)
caller done
```
The caller got **0, not 42**. Both of my earlier claims were wrong in opposite
directions: "not expressible" was too strong — fire-and-forget works today,
bound after the build, no compiler change. "Expressible" was too strong the
other way.
## Follow-on cycle — a future is one more tagged object
```
P1 el_val_t already carries tagged heap objects TRUE 5 magic tags exist
P2 a future is one more TRUE
P3 the caller awaits and gets 42 TRUE
P4 ZERO compiler changes TRUE runtime C + one binding
P5 the unbound path still works FALSE SIGSEGV
```
**P4 is the result.** `@async` — called unexpressible for hours — needs no
compiler change. A future is one more magic-tagged heap object; `defer` returns
the handle, `el_await` blocks.
**P5 is the failure that mattered.** Sixty seconds after diagnosing
`let s: String = 42` as an arbitrary read, I wrote the identical defect into
`el_await`: reading `->magic` off an unvalidated slot. That opened cycle 19.
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# a convention is not a gate
One `Ishikawa → scientific method → Six Sigma` loop. The record below is the
commit message as written at the time, before the outcome was known to anyone
reading this file.
## Record — `9a6c161`
```
a slot must be validated before it is dereferenced
ISHIKAWA: el_val_t carries integers AND tagged heap pointers, so "is this a
pointer" is undecidable without checking first. That check was a CONVENTION
every author had to know rather than a GATE they had to pass through, and
looks_like_heap_obj was static -- so every sibling translation unit re-derived
it.
MEASURED, across the five existing tags
geom_of looks_like_heap_obj full guard correct
mfld_of looks_like_heap_obj full guard correct
el_bin_lookup (uintptr_t)p < 4096 floor only reads 8 bytes BACKWARD
el_input_len s ? ... : 0 NULL only strlen's an integer
sha256_hex(50000) -> exit 139, SIGSEGV, compiled clean
PREDICTIONS AND RESULTS
P1 looks_like_heap_obj is static, not exported TRUE
P2 each tagged type re-derives the check TRUE
P3 at least one is missing guard components TRUE (two are)
P6 sha256_hex(<int>) reads out of bounds TRUE
P8 routing el_bin_lookup through the gate fixes it FALSE
P9 the legitimate hash is unchanged TRUE
P11 fixpoint and suites hold TRUE
P8 IS THE USEFUL FAILURE. Guarding the tagged lookup changed nothing --
looks_like_heap_obj(49992) correctly returns 0, el_bin_lookup bails, and then
el_input_len falls through to strlen() on address 50000. The FALLBACK was the
hazard, not the tagged path. A NULL check does not establish that a slot is a
pointer. I would have shipped the wrong fix and called it verified.
A MEASUREMENT DEFECT, fourth today: my first run of the crash reported exit=0,
because $? read head's exit through a pipe rather than the program's. I nearly
recorded a segfault as a clean run. Same shape as grepping only parser.el and
searching by variable name instead of by operation.
AND I PROVED THE HAZARD FROM THE INSIDE. Sixty seconds after diagnosing
`let s: String = 42` as an arbitrary-read primitive, I wrote the identical
defect into el_await -- dereferencing ->magic off an unvalidated slot -- and
only then found the runtime had already made it twice.
el_tagged() is now exported in el_runtime.h. Anything that dereferences a slot
without passing through it is the defect.
105/105 native, 42/42 integration across eight harnesses, fixpoint ok.
```
## Record — `3049a70`
```
make the guard a gate: sha256_hex(50000) no longer segfaults
```
+12
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
# Architecture questions closed
All five were open in `geometry-vs-code.md`. Each was closed by measurement, not
by argument.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| **Concurrency** — hardware threads are code, but is *ordering* geometric? | **Ordering is geometric.** Causality is a partial order (Lamport 1978); a total order is an arbitrary extension that "cannot be depended on to imply a causal relationship." Languages force a total order at authoring time, so every lock, barrier and fence is apparatus for recovering the partial order that was destroyed. CALM: a program has a coordination-free implementation **iff monotone**. What breaks monotonicity is destructive update. **Coordination is the price of forgetting.** |
| **Error handling** — does `grounded: false` cover *failed*? | **No.** Standing is a *signed* component: `>0` supported, `=0` unknown, `<0` contradicted. Not-known and known-false are opposite directions on one axis; a boolean cannot tell them apart. `inhibitory` as an int32 flag is that sign wearing a boolean. |
| **Parsing** — is a grammar a convention, or a region? | **A grammar is a basis; parsing is transduction onto it.** Lexeme→token is convention, shape recognition is a region, byte traversal is irreducible. **But the SHOULD gate refused the obvious move:** the keyword table stays code, because the set is closed by the language definition and the lexer runs before the program is understood. Same verdict as `is_digit` in ASCII. |
| **Numeric literals** — is `3` a position or a convention? | **The numeral is convention; the number is a position — and a bare `3` is a magnitude with no axis.** It is not a position until something gives it a direction, which is why `3.days` needs a calendar. Demonstrated: `t + 3` refused, `t + 1.hour` accepted. |
| **The module system** — if the partition is a neighbourhood, does linking survive? | **Premature.** The partition is a filesystem path and there is no namespacing at all. `import` is textual inlining; with a `.elh` header, symbols resolve at C link time. Two modules defining `helper` emit two C functions into one translation unit. Linking barely survives the *path* partition. |
+74
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Live defects found
Every one compiled clean, ran, and produced a wrong result or a crash with **no
diagnostic at any layer**. All four were present before this session; none was
introduced by it.
## Silent miscompilations
### 1. An unannotated `let` loses its type
```el
let a = str_len("hello") // no annotation
let b = str_len("hi")
let c = a + b // el_str_concat(a, b) on two integers
```
Compiled clean. Printed **nothing** where it should print 7. Fixed: an
unannotated `let` takes its type from what its initialiser returns. The return
types were already required for dispatch and were simply never consulted at the
binding site.
### 2. Reserved keywords that reserved nothing
```el
let seed = 42
let impl = seed + 1
```
`sealed`, `activate`, `seed`, `protocol`, `impl` were keywords in the lexer and
consumed by no parser or codegen path. Using one did not fail to parse — it
compiled clean, with zero `cc` errors, and printed **0 instead of 44**. Fixed by
removing all five.
### 3. `Instant + Int` was never refused
```el
let t: Instant = now()
let u: Instant = t + 3 // (t + 3), reported clean
```
`Duration + Int` was refused — *"an Int carries no unit"* — while adding a
dimensionless number to a **point** silently moved the instant by an
unspecified amount. Three of *what*? Whatever the representation happens to be.
The rule was simply never written.
## Security-relevant
### 4. Annotations are never verified
```el
let x: Int = "hello"; x + 1 → 4343631981 a string POINTER used as an integer
let s: String = 42; println(s) → nothing address 42 dereferenced
```
The first **leaks a raw memory address into program output**. The second is an
**arbitrary-read primitive** if the integer is ever attacker-influenced.
### 5. `sha256_hex(<integer>)` segfaults
```el
let h: String = sha256_hex(50000) exit 139, SIGSEGV
```
Compiled clean. `el_bin_lookup` checked only a 4096 floor — no alignment, no
small-int, no negative — and reads **eight bytes backward** from the pointer.
And the actual crash was one level further on: `el_input_len` fell through to
`strlen()` on address 50000, because a NULL check does not establish that a slot
is a pointer.
Fixed, and the guard is now a **gate**: `el_tagged()` is exported in
`el_runtime.h`. `geom_of` and `mfld_of` were always correct because their authors
knew to call `looks_like_heap_obj`; `el_bin_lookup` and `el_input_len` were wrong
because theirs did not, and the function was `static`, so every sibling
translation unit re-derived it.
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Defects in my own measurement
Recorded because the pattern is the point: **four of these, all the same shape —
searching by name or scope instead of by the operation itself.** Each was caught
by running something, never by reading.
### 1. Scoped the search to one file
Reported `test` as an inert keyword by checking only `parser.el`. **codegen**
consumes it at 4135 for `--test` mode, and the tree has 408 uses. Removing it
would have broken every test in the suite — including the ones used to verify
the removal.
### 2. Searched by variable name, not by operation
Grepped for `native_list_append(tokens` to find direct token appends.
`interp_tokens_append_all` calls its parameters `dst`/`result`, carries its own
copy of the stride, and corrupted generation 2 — while generation 1 built fine,
because the compiler's own source uses string interpolation.
### 3. Scoped to compiler sources; the stride had escaped into tests
`tok_count` in `test_compiler.el` computed `len/2` independently. 21 tests failed
after the token layout changed.
### 4. Read the wrong exit code
```bash
timeout 10 /tmp/leakrun 2>&1 | head -2; echo "exit=$?" # reports head's exit
```
Reported `exit=0` for a program that was returning **139 (SIGSEGV)**. I nearly
recorded a segfault as a clean run.
### And one that was not a measurement defect but a method defect
One cycle was run **without committing predictions first** — see
`cycles/18-async-half-expressible.md`. The test joined the thread immediately
after creating it and printed the word `DEFERRED` itself. A test authored by the
party holding the conclusion, with nothing committed beforehand, cannot fail.
It had to be discarded and re-run.
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
+40
View File
@@ -414,6 +414,12 @@ fn parse_import_line(trimmed: String, dir: String) -> String {
// Accumulates chunks into lists and joins once at the end to avoid the O(n²)
// memory growth caused by repeated `prefix = prefix + chunk` concatenation.
fn resolve_imports(src_path: String) -> String {
// Only the OUTERMOST call publishes provenance. Nested calls number their
// lines from 1 within themselves, so their spans are meaningless once the
// text is spliced into the parent.
let depth: String = state_get("__elc_prov_depth")
if str_eq(depth, "") { state_set("__elc_prov_depth", "1") }
let is_top: Bool = str_eq(depth, "")
let seen_key: String = "__elc_imp__:" + src_path
let already: String = state_get(seen_key)
if !str_eq(already, "") { return "" }
@@ -443,6 +449,7 @@ fn resolve_imports(src_path: String) -> String {
// Collect chunks into lists O(1) amortized per append.
// Join once at the end O(n) single pass.
let prefix_chunks: [String] = native_list_empty()
let prefix_paths: [String] = native_list_empty()
let body_chunks: [String] = native_list_empty()
let i: Int = 0
while i < n {
@@ -454,21 +461,54 @@ fn resolve_imports(src_path: String) -> String {
// Only check .elh for imported files never for the entry file itself.
let imp_elh_path: String = str_slice(imp_path, 0, str_len(imp_path) - 3) + ".elh"
let imp_elh: String = fs_read(imp_elh_path)
// Provenance: record which line range of the combined source came
// from which file, so a diagnostic can name the FILE and not just a
// line in a string that no longer exists on disk.
if !str_eq(imp_elh, "") {
// Header exists: mark the .el as seen (so it won't be re-inlined
// if something else also imports it) and use the header text.
let seen_imp_key: String = "__elc_imp__:" + imp_path
state_set(seen_imp_key, "1")
let prefix_chunks = native_list_append(prefix_chunks, imp_elh)
let prefix_paths = native_list_append(prefix_paths, imp_path)
} else {
let imp_body: String = resolve_imports(imp_path)
let prefix_chunks = native_list_append(prefix_chunks, imp_body)
let prefix_paths = native_list_append(prefix_paths, imp_path)
}
} else {
let body_chunks = native_list_append(body_chunks, line + "\n")
}
let i = i + 1
}
// Walk the assembled chunks once and publish <file> spans <start> <end>.
// LIMIT: nested imports return a single string, so their internal
// boundaries are already lost by the time we see them -- a definition
// inside a transitively imported file is attributed to the direct import.
// Local, not accumulated in state: a nested call numbers its lines from 1
// within itself, so letting it append to a shared buffer republishes
// meaningless spans under the parent's name.
let prov: String = ""
let line_at: Int = 1
let ci: Int = 0
let nchunks: Int = native_list_len(prefix_chunks)
while ci < nchunks {
let chunk: String = native_list_get(prefix_chunks, ci)
let nlines: Int = str_count_lines(chunk)
let src: String = native_list_get(prefix_paths, ci)
let prov = prov + src + " spans " + native_int_to_str(line_at) + " " + native_int_to_str(line_at + nlines - 1) + "\n"
let line_at = line_at + nlines
let ci = ci + 1
}
let prov = prov + src_path + " spans " + native_int_to_str(line_at) + " 999999\n"
if is_top {
let prov_out: String = env("EL_RELATIONS_OUT")
if !str_eq(prov_out, "") {
let existing: String = ""
if fs_exists(prov_out) { let existing = fs_read(prov_out) }
fs_write(prov_out, existing + prov)
}
}
return str_join(prefix_chunks, "") + str_join(body_chunks, "")
}
+41 -7
View File
@@ -138,13 +138,38 @@ fn lex_is_whitespace(ch: String) -> Bool {
// tok_append append a (kind, value) pair to a flat token list.
// Returns the updated list. Gamma combines flat-list + char-code for max savings.
// A token is (kind, value, line). The line comes from state rather than a
// parameter so the ~200 existing tok_append call sites are untouched -- the
// lexer advances __lex_line as it walks, and every token minted takes the line
// it was minted on.
//
// WHY AT ALL: before this a token carried no position, so no diagnostic in El
// could name a place. Every error named a symbol and never a line, and after
// textual inlining there was no way to say which FILE a definition came from.
fn tok_append(tokens: [Any], kind: String, value: String) -> [Any] {
let tokens = native_list_append(tokens, kind)
native_list_append(tokens, value)
let tokens = native_list_append(tokens, value)
native_list_append(tokens, state_get("__lex_line"))
}
// -- Keyword lookup ------------------------------------------------------------
// keyword_kind the language's reserved spellings.
//
// A grammar is a BASIS: `fn` means function-start because someone said so, and
// nothing derives it. But unlike the other tables moved out this session, this
// one stays code, and the SHOULD gate is why. The keyword set is closed by the
// language definition -- it does not leak the way an allowlist does -- and the
// lexer runs before the program is understood, so a program can never declare
// its own keywords. Externalising it would cost file I/O on every compile and
// buy nothing.
//
// Removed 2026-08-17: sealed, activate, seed, protocol, impl. Reserved in the
// lexer, consumed by no parser or codegen path, and each one stole an
// identifier from users for nothing. `test` LOOKED inert by the same measure
// and is not -- codegen consumes it at 4135 for --test mode, 408 uses in the
// tree. The first measurement checked only parser.el and would have broken all
// of them.
fn keyword_kind(word: String) -> String {
if word == "let" { return "Let" }
if word == "fn" { return "Fn" }
@@ -161,14 +186,9 @@ fn keyword_kind(word: String) -> String {
if word == "from" { return "From" }
if word == "as" { return "As" }
if word == "with" { return "With" }
if word == "sealed" { return "Sealed" }
if word == "activate" { return "Activate" }
if word == "where" { return "Where" }
if word == "test" { return "Test" }
if word == "seed" { return "Seed" }
if word == "assert" { return "Assert" }
if word == "protocol" { return "Protocol" }
if word == "impl" { return "Impl" }
if word == "retry" { return "Retry" }
if word == "times" { return "Times" }
if word == "fallback" { return "Fallback" }
@@ -521,6 +541,12 @@ fn scan_interp_brace(src: String, start: Int, total: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
// interp_tokens_append_all - copy every (kind, value) pair from flat src list
// into flat dst list, skipping the trailing Eof pair that lex() always appends.
// Splices re-lexed interpolation tokens into the stream. This walks the token
// list DIRECTLY rather than through tok_append, so it carries its own copy of
// the stride -- which is why giving tokens a line broke the compiler's second
// generation and not its first: the compiler's own source uses string
// interpolation, so gen1 (built by the old compiler) was fine and gen2 emitted
// a corrupted stream.
fn interp_tokens_append_all(dst: [Any], src: [Any]) -> [Any] {
let src_len: Int = native_list_len(src)
let j = 0
@@ -531,9 +557,11 @@ fn interp_tokens_append_all(dst: [Any], src: [Any]) -> [Any] {
let j = src_len
} else {
let val: String = native_list_get(src, j + 1)
let ln: String = native_list_get(src, j + 2)
let result = native_list_append(result, kind)
let result = native_list_append(result, val)
let j = j + 2
let result = native_list_append(result, ln)
let j = j + 3
}
}
result
@@ -764,8 +792,14 @@ fn lex(source: String) -> [Any] {
let total: Int = str_len(source)
let tokens: [Any] = native_list_empty()
let i: Int = 0
state_set("__lex_line", "1")
let line_no: Int = 1
while i < total {
if str_eq(str_slice(source, i, i + 1), "\n") {
let line_no = line_no + 1
state_set("__lex_line", native_int_to_str(line_no))
}
let c: Int = str_char_code(source, i)
// Skip whitespace (space=32, tab=9, newline=10, CR=13)
+24 -13
View File
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
// programs. All callers use these helpers -- only these three need updating.
fn tok_at(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
let kind: String = native_list_get(tokens, pos * 2)
let value: String = native_list_get(tokens, pos * 2 + 1)
let kind: String = native_list_get(tokens, pos * 3)
let value: String = native_list_get(tokens, pos * 3 + 1)
{ "kind": kind, "value": value }
}
@@ -28,25 +28,32 @@ fn tok_kind(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> String {
// single trailing Eof token returns runtime null (el_list_get OOB -> 0),
// which matches no delimiter, letting inner parse loops append AST nodes
// forever on malformed input -> unbounded allocation -> OOM.
let n: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let n: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
if pos < 0 {
return "Eof"
}
if pos >= n {
return "Eof"
}
native_list_get(tokens, pos * 2)
native_list_get(tokens, pos * 3)
}
fn tok_line(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> String {
let n: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
if pos < 0 { return "0" }
if pos >= n { return "0" }
native_list_get(tokens, pos * 3 + 2)
}
fn tok_value(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> String {
let n: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let n: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
if pos < 0 {
return ""
}
if pos >= n {
return ""
}
native_list_get(tokens, pos * 2 + 1)
native_list_get(tokens, pos * 3 + 1)
}
// parse_progress_fatal robustness backstop. Called by the token-consuming
@@ -1230,7 +1237,7 @@ fn parse_block(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
// Runaway backstop: a block can hold at most (token count) statements, since
// every iteration consumes >= 1 token. If we exceed that, the cursor has run
// off the end without terminating (malformed input) -> fail fast, don't hang.
let blk_total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let blk_total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let blk_iters: Int = 0
while running {
let blk_iters = blk_iters + 1
@@ -1550,7 +1557,10 @@ fn parse_stmt(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
let p = r2["pos"]
// r2 result map fully consumed release to free peak heap.
el_release(r2)
return make_result({ "stmt": "FnDef", "name": name, "params": params, "body": body, "ret_type": ret_type }, p)
// The definition carries the line it was written on. Without it no
// diagnostic can name a place, and after textual inlining there is no
// way to say which FILE a definition came from.
return make_result({ "stmt": "FnDef", "name": name, "params": params, "body": body, "ret_type": ret_type, "line": tok_line(tokens, pos) }, p)
}
// type definition: `type Name = { field: Type, ... }`
@@ -1842,6 +1852,7 @@ fn parse_stmt(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
"params": inner["params"],
"body": inner["body"],
"ret_type": inner["ret_type"],
"line": inner["line"],
"decorator": dec_name,
"decorators": dlist
}
@@ -2158,7 +2169,7 @@ fn parse_stmt(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
fn parse(tokens: [Any]) -> [Map<String, Any>] {
// Flat list: 2 entries per token, so divide by 2 for token count.
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let stmts: [Map<String, Any>] = native_list_empty()
let pos: Int = 0
let running = true
@@ -2201,7 +2212,7 @@ fn parse_one(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
// On entry, pos must point at the LBrace token.
// Returns the position of the token AFTER the matching RBrace.
fn skip_to_rbrace(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Int {
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let p: Int = pos + 1
let depth: Int = 1
let going: Bool = true
@@ -2253,7 +2264,7 @@ fn is_stmt_start_kind(k: String) -> Bool {
// token that could start a new top-level statement, staying depth-aware
// so that braces inside expressions don't fool us.
fn skip_expr_to_stmt_boundary(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Int {
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let p: Int = pos
let depth: Int = 0
let going: Bool = true
@@ -2419,7 +2430,7 @@ fn scan_params_el(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
//
// Peak memory: O(tokens) with no expression AST allocation.
fn scan_fn_sigs_el(tokens: [Any]) -> [Map<String, Any>] {
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let sigs: [Map<String, Any>] = native_list_empty()
let pos: Int = 0
let going: Bool = true
@@ -2561,7 +2572,7 @@ fn scan_params_c(tokens: [Any], pos: Int) -> Map<String, Any> {
//
// The scan allocates only small string values per entry, keeping peak RSS low.
fn scan_fn_sigs(tokens: [Any]) -> [Map<String, Any>] {
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 2
let total: Int = native_list_len(tokens) / 3
let sigs: [Map<String, Any>] = native_list_empty()
let pos: Int = 0
let going: Bool = true
+215 -11
View File
@@ -712,6 +712,20 @@ el_val_t el_map_set(el_val_t mapv, el_val_t keyv, el_val_t value) {
* happen to look like aligned heap pointers are exceedingly unlikely to land
* on a page whose first 4 bytes match either magic. */
/* el_tagged — THE gate for "is this slot a heap object carrying this tag".
*
* el_val_t carries both integers and tagged heap pointers, so deciding which
* requires checking the value BEFORE dereferencing it. That check was a
* convention every author had to know rather than a gate they had to pass
* through, and the result is measurable: geom_of and mfld_of call
* looks_like_heap_obj and are correct; el_bin_lookup checked only a 4096 floor
* -- no alignment, no small-int, no negative -- and reads EIGHT BYTES BACKWARD
* from the pointer. sha256_hex(50000) therefore compiled clean and segfaulted.
*
* Exported, so the engram siblings stop re-deriving it. Anything that
* dereferences a slot without passing through here is the defect. */
int el_tagged(el_val_t v, uint32_t magic);
static int looks_like_heap_obj(el_val_t v) {
if (v == 0) return 0;
int64_t s = (int64_t)v;
@@ -722,6 +736,12 @@ static int looks_like_heap_obj(el_val_t v) {
return 1;
}
int el_tagged(el_val_t v, uint32_t magic) {
if (!looks_like_heap_obj(v)) return 0;
return *(const uint32_t*)(uintptr_t)v == magic;
}
void el_retain(el_val_t v) {
if (!looks_like_heap_obj(v)) return;
ElHeader* h = (ElHeader*)(uintptr_t)v;
@@ -14379,7 +14399,67 @@ el_val_t engram_ise_log_append(el_val_t content_v){
}
}
fputs("\"}\n", f);
/* RETENTION (2026-08-17 self-review). The on-graph ISE branch in
* server.el calls engram_prune_telemetry(48h) on every insert, but that
* branch is DEAD in production: ENGRAM_ISE_OFFGRAPH=1 is the live
* setting, so every state event lands here instead and this path had
* no retention of any kind. Measured: 17.1 MB / 14,305 events over 3.56
* days = 4.81 MB/day, growing without bound (~1.76 GB/year). The graph
* got its telemetry-growth fix on 2026-07-16; moving telemetry off-graph
* moved the leak rather than closing it.
*
* Byte-bounded rather than time-bounded on purpose: this is a flat
* append-only file with no index, so size is the property that actually
* has to be bounded, and a byte check is O(1) against the handle we
* already hold (ftell) instead of an O(file) timestamp scan per append.
* At the measured rate the 64 MB default retains ~13 days comfortably
* more history than the 48h the on-graph path kept.
*
* Compaction keeps the TAIL, never the head: engram_dreams_json reads
* the last ~2 MB of this file for dream-recall, so the recent end is the
* end that has a reader. KEEP is held well above that 2 MB window so
* recall is never truncated by a rotation. The honesty rail is
* preserved exactly as before rotated-out remains "I don't remember",
* never a synthesized dream; this only makes the forgetting bounded and
* explicit instead of deferred forever. */
long pos = ftell(f);
fclose(f);
{
long maxb = 64L*1024L*1024L;
long keepb = 16L*1024L*1024L;
const char* mv = getenv("ENGRAM_ISE_LOG_MAX_BYTES");
if (mv && *mv) { long v = atol(mv); if (v > 0) maxb = v; }
if (keepb > maxb/2) keepb = maxb/2;
if (pos > 0 && pos > maxb) {
FILE* rf = fopen(path, "rb");
if (rf) {
if (fseek(rf, pos - keepb, SEEK_SET) == 0) {
char* buf = (char*)malloc((size_t)keepb + 1);
if (buf) {
size_t rd = fread(buf, 1, (size_t)keepb, rf);
buf[rd] = 0;
/* Resume at the first LINE boundary so the tail never
* begins with a half-written JSON record. */
char* start = memchr(buf, '\n', rd);
start = start ? start + 1 : buf;
size_t keep_n = rd - (size_t)(start - buf);
char tmp[4096];
snprintf(tmp, sizeof tmp, "%s/state-events.jsonl.tmp", dir);
FILE* wf = fopen(tmp, "wb");
if (wf) {
int ok = (fwrite(start, 1, keep_n, wf) == keep_n);
fclose(wf);
/* Only replace the live log if the tail was written
* in full a short write must not destroy history. */
if (ok) rename(tmp, path); else remove(tmp);
}
free(buf);
}
}
fclose(rf);
}
}
}
return EL_INT(1);
}
@@ -16991,24 +17071,140 @@ void dharma_emit(el_val_t event_type, el_val_t payload) {
free(b.buf);
}
/* engram_boundary_beat(op_name) — the decorated-fn boundary AUTO-EMIT (VBD seam).
* codegen injects a single call to this at the entry of every @manager/@accessor
* decorated fn, so a decorated op self-reports with ZERO hand-written
* instrumentation in its body:
/* engram_boundary_beat(op_name, construct) — decorated-fn boundary AUTO-EMIT
* (VBD seam). codegen injects a single call to this at the entry of every
* @manager/@accessor decorated fn, so a decorated op self-reports with ZERO
* hand-written instrumentation in its body:
* (1) afferent counter++ the boundary was crossed
* (2) engram_chrono_tick() interoception: the mind senses its own op firing
* (3) engram_strengthen(self-anchor) reinforce the self-activity anchor (an
* activation-count/salience bump, NOT a content/edge write identity
* write-protection is untouched)
* (4) dharma_emit(neuron.op.<name>) provenance on the shared bus transport
* (same bus the swarm peers field on); bumps _eg_dharma_emits. */
el_val_t engram_boundary_beat(el_val_t op_name) {
* (same bus the swarm peers field on); bumps _eg_dharma_emits.
*
* `construct` is the DECORATOR that caused the beat ("manager" / "accessor"),
* carried in the payload. Before it, the beat reported which fn crossed a
* boundary but never which construct put the beat there so boundary events
* accumulated in the graph with no attribution, and no decorator could ever be
* measured. "Is this construct earning its keep" was an argument; with the
* attribution it is a traversal. The payload is built here rather than at the
* call site so the format has exactly one author.
*
* The construct name comes from a closed set codegen controls, so the
* unescaped snprintf below cannot be injected through. That is NOT true of
* dharma_emit generally its payloads are hand-concatenated at 39 call sites
* with no escaping, and a value containing a quote silently corrupts the
* event. Fixing that is a separate change; this one does not add to it. */
/* ── Runtime construct seam ───────────────────────────────────────────────
* The crossing is resolved at EXECUTION, not at emission. Codegen emits one
* indirection per function; which constructs apply is read from a table that
* can be written AFTER the binary exists.
*
* This is the whole hypothesis under test: a compiler whose one compiled
* mechanism is language extension can compose without recompilation. If a
* construct declared after the build applies to a running program, the five
* compile-time declaration kinds were the wrong shape.
*
* Table format, one binding per line:
* <fn> <construct> entry|exit <target-symbol>
*
* Targets are resolved with dlsym against the running image, so composition is
* bounded by the LINKED SYMBOL SET -- a construct naming a symbol nobody
* linked is skipped, not fatal. That bound is the honest limit on "endless". */
#define EL_SEAM_MAX 256
#define EL_PHASE_ENTRY 0
#define EL_PHASE_EXIT 1
typedef struct { char* fn; char* construct; int phase; char* target;
void* resolved; int resolve_tried; } ElSeamBinding;
static ElSeamBinding _el_seam[EL_SEAM_MAX];
static int _el_seam_n = 0;
static int _el_seam_loaded = 0;
static void el_seam_load(void) {
if (_el_seam_loaded) return;
_el_seam_loaded = 1;
const char* p = getenv("EL_CONSTRUCTS");
if (!p || !*p) return;
FILE* f = fopen(p, "r");
if (!f) return;
char line[512];
while (fgets(line, sizeof line, f) && _el_seam_n < EL_SEAM_MAX) {
char fn[128], con[128], ph[32], tgt[128];
if (sscanf(line, "%127s %127s %31s %127s", fn, con, ph, tgt) == 4) {
if (fn[0] == '#') continue;
_el_seam[_el_seam_n].fn = el_strdup(fn);
_el_seam[_el_seam_n].construct = el_strdup(con);
_el_seam[_el_seam_n].phase = (strcmp(ph, "exit") == 0) ? EL_PHASE_EXIT :
(strcmp(ph, "wrap") == 0) ? 2 : EL_PHASE_ENTRY;
_el_seam[_el_seam_n].target = el_strdup(tgt);
_el_seam_n++;
}
}
fclose(f);
}
/* el_seam_wrap — the seam calls the body itself, so a bound construct can
* control invocation: run it zero times, N times, or around a transaction.
* With no binding it is a direct call through the thunk, which is what the
* unwrapped code did anyway. */
el_val_t el_seam_wrap(el_val_t fn_v, el_val_t (*body)(void*), void* env) {
if (!_el_seam_loaded) el_seam_load();
if (_el_seam_n == 0) return body(env);
const char* fn = EL_CSTR(fn_v);
if (!fn) return body(env);
for (int i = 0; i < _el_seam_n; i++) {
if (_el_seam[i].phase != 2) continue; /* 2 = wrap */
if (strcmp(_el_seam[i].fn, fn) != 0) continue;
if (!_el_seam[i].resolve_tried) {
_el_seam[i].resolved = dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, _el_seam[i].target);
_el_seam[i].resolve_tried = 1;
}
if (!_el_seam[i].resolved) continue;
el_val_t (*fp)(el_val_t, el_val_t, el_val_t (*)(void*), void*) =
(el_val_t (*)(el_val_t, el_val_t, el_val_t (*)(void*), void*))_el_seam[i].resolved;
return fp(fn_v, el_wrap_str(el_strdup(_el_seam[i].construct)), body, env);
}
return body(env);
}
el_val_t el_seam_run(el_val_t fn_v, el_val_t phase_v, el_val_t result) {
if (!_el_seam_loaded) el_seam_load();
if (_el_seam_n == 0) return result; /* the common path: no bindings */
const char* fn = EL_CSTR(fn_v);
if (!fn) return result;
int phase = (int)phase_v;
el_val_t last = result;
for (int i = 0; i < _el_seam_n; i++) {
if (_el_seam[i].phase != phase) continue;
if (strcmp(_el_seam[i].fn, fn) != 0) continue;
/* Resolve ONCE. dlsym walks the dynamic symbol table on every call, and
* measured at 6.6x on a hot path with two bindings -- the table scan was
* never the cost. What is hot must stay resolved; this is the smallest
* form of the same thing salience does for memory. */
if (!_el_seam[i].resolve_tried) {
_el_seam[i].resolved = dlsym(RTLD_DEFAULT, _el_seam[i].target);
_el_seam[i].resolve_tried = 1;
}
void* sym = _el_seam[i].resolved;
if (!sym) continue; /* unlinked target: skipped, not fatal */
el_val_t (*fp)(el_val_t, el_val_t, el_val_t) =
(el_val_t (*)(el_val_t, el_val_t, el_val_t))sym;
last = fp(fn_v, el_wrap_str(el_strdup(_el_seam[i].construct)), last);
}
return last;
}
el_val_t engram_boundary_beat(el_val_t op_name, el_val_t construct) {
_eg_aff_boundary_ops++;
engram_chrono_tick();
engram_strengthen(EL_STR("kn-efeb4a5b-5aff-4759-8a97-7233099be6ee"));
const char* nm = EL_CSTR(op_name); if (!nm) nm = "";
const char* nm = EL_CSTR(op_name); if (!nm) nm = "";
const char* ct = EL_CSTR(construct); if (!ct) ct = "";
char ev[160]; snprintf(ev, sizeof ev, "neuron.op.%s", nm);
dharma_emit(el_wrap_str(el_strdup(ev)), EL_STR(""));
char pl[192]; snprintf(pl, sizeof pl, "{\"construct\":\"%s\"}", ct);
dharma_emit(el_wrap_str(el_strdup(ev)), el_wrap_str(el_strdup(pl)));
return (el_val_t)0;
}
@@ -18096,8 +18292,11 @@ static int el_bin_lookup(const void* p, size_t* out_len) {
/* Avoid reading off the front of a page on tiny pointers (e.g. NULs
* passed in as int-cast values). 4096 is a safe lower bound on any
* platform we target. */
if ((uintptr_t)p < 4096) return 0;
const el_bin_hdr_t* hdr = (const el_bin_hdr_t*)((const char*)p - sizeof(el_bin_hdr_t));
/* Reads BACKWARD, so the HEADER address is what must be validated -- and a
* 4096 floor alone let sha256_hex(50000) through to a SIGSEGV. */
const char* hp = (const char*)p - sizeof(el_bin_hdr_t);
if (!looks_like_heap_obj((el_val_t)(uintptr_t)hp)) return 0;
const el_bin_hdr_t* hdr = (const el_bin_hdr_t*)hp;
if (hdr->magic != EL_MAGIC_BIN) return 0;
*out_len = hdr->length;
return 1;
@@ -18107,7 +18306,12 @@ static int el_bin_lookup(const void* p, size_t* out_len) {
static size_t el_input_len(const char* s) {
size_t n;
if (el_bin_lookup(s, &n)) return n;
return s ? strlen(s) : 0;
/* The FALLBACK is the hazard, not the tagged lookup. A NULL check does not
* establish that a slot is a pointer: el_val_t carries integers too, so
* strlen() on `sha256_hex(50000)` walks address 50000. Guarding the tagged
* path alone left this untouched and the SIGSEGV unchanged -- measured. */
if (!looks_like_heap_obj((el_val_t)(uintptr_t)s)) return 0;
return strlen(s);
}
/* ─── SHA-256 (Brad Conte / public domain) ──────────────────────────────── */
+4 -1
View File
@@ -887,7 +887,10 @@ el_val_t engram_age_field(el_val_t delta_ms);
el_val_t engram_age_field_catchup(void);
el_val_t engram_chrono_persist_tick(void);
el_val_t engram_chrono_tick(void);
el_val_t engram_boundary_beat(el_val_t op_name); /* API-reshape decorator-seam auto-emit */
el_val_t engram_boundary_beat(el_val_t op_name, el_val_t construct);
int el_tagged(el_val_t v, uint32_t magic); /* the gate: validate a slot BEFORE dereferencing it */
el_val_t el_seam_run(el_val_t fn_name, el_val_t phase, el_val_t result); /* runtime construct seam */
el_val_t el_seam_wrap(el_val_t fn_name, el_val_t (*body)(void*), void* env); /* runtime invocation control */ /* API-reshape decorator-seam auto-emit; construct = the decorator that caused the beat */
el_val_t engram_self_anchor_capture(void);
el_val_t engram_self_drift_json(void);
el_val_t engram_neighbors_json(el_val_t node_id, el_val_t max_depth, el_val_t direction);
+2 -1
View File
@@ -460,7 +460,8 @@ The `@` token followed by an identifier attaches a decorator to the next `FnDef`
| Decorator | Structural effect |
|---|---|
| `@manager` | Permits calls to `dharma_emit` / `dharma_field`. Calling either from a non-`@manager` fn emits a `#error` into the generated C — a compile-time failure, not a lint. |
| `@manager`, `@accessor` | Codegen injects one call to `engram_boundary_beat(<fn name>)` at function entry. The decorated op self-reports (chrono tick, afferent counter, self-activity strengthen, dharma bus event) with **zero** hand-written instrumentation in its body. |
| `@manager`, `@accessor` | Codegen injects one call to `engram_boundary_beat(<fn name>, <construct>)` at function entry, where `<construct>` is the decorator that caused the beat. The decorated op self-reports (chrono tick, afferent counter, self-activity strengthen, dharma bus event carrying `{"construct":"..."}`) with **zero** hand-written instrumentation in its body. Without the construct argument the graph accumulates boundary events with no attribution, so no construct can be measured. |
| `@decorator(kind, target)` | **Declares a construct.** The decorated `fn`'s name becomes a usable decorator whose meaning is `target`. Codegen reads the declaration; it does not know the construct. Adding a construct is a declaration in the program, not a compiler edit. Two kinds exist: `"injects_at_entry"` calls `target(<fn>, <construct>)` at entry, result discarded — this is what `@manager`/`@accessor` are, seeded as the compiled-in core. `"guards_at_entry"` calls `target(<fn>, <construct>)` at entry and a **non-zero return short-circuits the decorated fn and becomes its result**. Guards run before injections (a refused call must not report a crossing) and *every* guard on a fn runs, whereas the topmost injecting construct wins. The compiler knows nothing about authentication, rate limiting or validation: the program points the construct at its own function. |
| `@route(path, method, …)` | Records a route into a generated dispatch table. |
Decorators with no registered meaning are accepted and ignored.
+34
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# annotation_query.sh — a declared type must match what it annotates.
#
# El had annotations and no checking: the annotation fed dispatch and was never
# verified against the value, so a mismatch did not fail, it REINTERPRETED
# MEMORY. let x: Int = "hello" printed 4343631981 (a string pointer used as an
# integer); let s: String = 42 dereferenced address 42.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: annotation_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cd "$LANG_DIR"
printf 'fn main() { let x: Int = "hello" println("x") }\n' > "$W/a.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r.txt" "$ELC" "$W/a.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
out=$(./tools/check/annotations.sh "$W/r.txt" 2>&1); rc=$?
chk "Int annotated on a String literal is caught" "1" "$rc"
chk "and names the variable" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c "'x' is declared Int")"
printf 'fn main() { let s: String = 42 println(s) }\n' > "$W/b.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/b.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
./tools/check/annotations.sh "$W/r2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "String annotated on an Int literal is caught" "1" "$?"
printf 'fn main() { let n: Int = 42 let s: String = "ok" println(s + int_to_str(n)) }\n' > "$W/c.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r3.txt" "$ELC" "$W/c.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
./tools/check/annotations.sh "$W/r3.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "correct annotations are clean" "0" "$?"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r4.txt" "$ELC" elc-cli.el >/dev/null 2>&1
./tools/check/annotations.sh "$W/r4.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "the compiler's own source is clean — no false positives" "0" "$?"
echo; echo " 5 assertions, $((5-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+26
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for arity-from-header: the runtime declares its own surface, so the
# compiler does not carry a second copy of it.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: arity_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
printf 'fn main() {\n println("a", "b")\n}\n' > "$W/bad.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r1.txt" "$ELC" "$W/bad.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "the emitter does not adjudicate arity" "0" "$("$ELC" "$W/bad.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c 'arity error')"
out=$("$LANG_DIR/tools/check/arity.sh" "$W/r1.txt" 2>&1); rc=$?
chk "a wrong-arity call is caught" "1" "$rc"
chk "the expected count is correct" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c "takes 1 arguments, called with 2")"
printf 'fn main() {\n println("a")\n}\n' > "$W/ok.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/ok.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/arity.sh" "$W/r2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "a correct call is clean" "0" "$?"
# multi-line declarations must not parse as zero params
n=$("$LANG_DIR/tools/check/arity.sh" "$W/r2.txt" | grep -oE '[0-9]+ signatures')
chk "signatures parsed from the header" "503 signatures" "$n"
echo; echo " 5 assertions, $((5-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+36
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for capability-as-policy: the compiler records the program's kind and
# its call graph; the shipped policy file and the checker decide.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: capability_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cat > "$W/u.el" <<'EOF'
fn leaky() -> Int {
dharma_emit("x", "y")
return 1
}
fn main() { println("ok") }
EOF
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r.txt" "$ELC" "$W/u.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "the emitter does not adjudicate" "0" "$("$ELC" "$W/u.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c 'capability violation')"
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/capabilities.sh" "$W/r.txt" > "$W/o.txt" 2>&1; rc=$?
chk "a utility calling a DHARMA primitive is caught" "1" "$rc"
chk "the offending fn is named" "1" "$(grep -c 'called from leaky' "$W/o.txt")"
cat > "$W/c.el" <<'EOF'
fn quiet() -> Int { return 1 }
fn main() { println("ok") }
EOF
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/c.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/capabilities.sh" "$W/r2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "a clean program exits 0" "0" "$?"
# the policy is DATA: editing it changes enforcement, with no compiler rebuild
printf 'utility prohibits_within println\n' > "$W/policy.rel"
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/capabilities.sh" "$W/r2.txt" "$W/policy.rel" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "editing the policy file changes enforcement, no rebuild" "1" "$?"
echo; echo " 5 assertions, $((5-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+27
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for duplicate-definition detection.
#
# El has no namespacing: import is textual inlining, so two modules defining the
# same name emit two C functions into one translation unit.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: definitions_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
printf 'fn helper() -> Int { return 1 }\n' > "$W/a.el"
printf 'fn helper() -> Int { return 2 }\n' > "$W/b.el"
printf 'import "a.el"\nimport "b.el"\nfn main() { println(int_to_str(helper())) }\n' > "$W/m.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r.txt" "$ELC" "$W/m.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
out=$("$LANG_DIR/tools/check/definitions.sh" "$W/r.txt" 2>&1); rc=$?
chk "a collision across modules is caught at El level" "1" "$rc"
chk "the colliding name is reported" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c "'helper' is defined 2 times")"
chk "and the reason is given" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c 'no namespacing')"
chk "both source FILES are named" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c 'a.el:1')"
chk "with file-local line numbers, not combined ones" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c 'b.el:1')"
printf 'fn only_once() -> Int { return 1 }\nfn main() { println(int_to_str(only_once())) }\n' > "$W/c.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/c.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/definitions.sh" "$W/r2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "a clean program exits 0" "0" "$?"
echo; echo " 6 assertions, $((6-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for prohibition-as-query: the compiler records, the checker decides.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: prohibition_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cat > "$W/p.el" <<'EOF'
@decorator("prohibits_outside", "raw_sql")
fn repository() {}
fn sneaky() -> Int { raw_sql("DROP") return 1 }
@repository
fn allowed() -> Int { raw_sql("SELECT") return 2 }
fn main() { println("ok") }
EOF
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/rel.txt" "$ELC" "$W/p.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/prohibitions.sh" "$W/rel.txt" > "$W/out.txt" 2>&1; rc=$?
chk "a violation outside the boundary is caught" "1" "$rc"
chk "the offending fn is named" "1" "$(grep -c 'sneaky is not one' "$W/out.txt")"
chk "a call inside the boundary is NOT flagged" "0" "$(grep -c 'allowed is not one' "$W/out.txt")"
cat > "$W/q.el" <<'EOF'
@decorator("prohibits_outside", "raw_sql")
fn repository() {}
@repository
fn only_allowed() -> Int { raw_sql("SELECT") return 1 }
fn main() { println("ok") }
EOF
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/rel2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/q.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"$LANG_DIR/tools/check/prohibitions.sh" "$W/rel2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "a clean program exits 0" "0" "$?"
echo; echo " 4 assertions, $((4-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+97
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# seam_binding.sh — integration control for the runtime construct seam.
#
# The seam's whole claim is that a construct declared AFTER a binary exists
# applies to that already-built program. That cannot be checked by
# compile_capture, which only sees emitted text: it needs a built binary, a
# linked target, and an environment. Hence a harness rather than a unit test.
#
# usage: seam_binding.sh <elc-binary> [lang-dir]
# exit 0 = all assertions held; non-zero = number of failures
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: seam_binding.sh <elc-binary> [lang-dir]}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
WORK="$(mktemp -d)"; trap 'rm -rf "$WORK"' EXIT
FAILS=0
ok() { printf ' ok %s\n' "$1"; }
fail() { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected: %s\n actual: %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; FAILS=$((FAILS+1)); }
check(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && ok "$1" || fail "$1" "$2" "$3"; }
SRCS=$("$LANG_DIR/../scripts/el-runtime-sources.sh" "$LANG_DIR/runtime")
CFLAGS="-std=c11 -O2 -rdynamic -I $LANG_DIR/runtime"
for d in /opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3 /usr/local/opt/openssl@3; do
[ -d "$d" ] && CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I $d/include" && LDFLAGS="-L $d/lib"
done
LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-} -lcurl -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -lm"
# A construct target that is LINKED but never referenced from El source.
cat > "$WORK/targets.c" <<'EOF'
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
typedef int64_t el_val_t;
el_val_t observe(el_val_t fn, el_val_t con, el_val_t r){
printf("SEEN %s/%s\n", (const char*)(intptr_t)fn, (const char*)(intptr_t)con);
return r; /* zero = do not refuse */
}
el_val_t double_result(el_val_t fn, el_val_t con, el_val_t r){
(void)fn; (void)con; return r * 2; /* exit: replace the result */
}
el_val_t refuse(el_val_t fn, el_val_t con, el_val_t r){
(void)fn; (void)con; (void)r; return 42; /* non-zero = short-circuit */
}
EOF
# A program with NO construct anywhere in its source.
cat > "$WORK/prog.el" <<'EOF'
fn work() -> Int {
return 7
}
fn main() {
println(int_to_str(work()))
}
EOF
"$ELC" "$WORK/prog.el" > "$WORK/prog.c" 2>/dev/null
cc $CFLAGS -o "$WORK/prog" "$WORK/prog.c" "$WORK/targets.c" $SRCS $LDFLAGS 2>/dev/null \
|| { echo " FAIL probe did not build"; exit 1; }
check "unbound program is unaffected" \
"7" "$(cd "$WORK" && ./prog 2>&1)"
printf 'work audited entry observe\n' > "$WORK/observe.txt"
check "a construct declared AFTER the build applies" \
"SEEN work/audited
7" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=observe.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
printf 'work denied entry refuse\n' > "$WORK/refuse.txt"
check "a construct declared after the build can REFUSE" \
"42" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=refuse.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
printf 'work ghost entry no_such_symbol_anywhere\n' > "$WORK/ghost.txt"
check "an unlinked target is skipped, not fatal" \
"7" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=ghost.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
printf 'other_fn x entry refuse\n' > "$WORK/other.txt"
check "a binding for a different fn does not fire" \
"7" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=other.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
printf 'work a entry observe\nwork b entry observe\n' > "$WORK/two.txt"
check "two constructs compose on one crossing" \
"SEEN work/a
SEEN work/b
7" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=two.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
cat >> "$WORK/targets.c" <<'TGT'
el_val_t thrice(el_val_t fn, el_val_t con, el_val_t (*b)(void*), void* e){
(void)fn; (void)con; return b(e) + b(e) + b(e); /* wrap: invoke N times */
}
TGT
printf 'work doubler exit double_result\n' > "$WORK/exit.txt"
check "an EXIT construct declared after the build replaces the result" \
"14" "$(cd "$WORK" && EL_CONSTRUCTS=exit.txt ./prog 2>&1)"
echo
echo " 7 assertions, $((7-FAILS)) passed, $FAILS failed"
exit $FAILS
+35
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# tagged_gate.sh — a slot must be validated before it is dereferenced.
#
# el_val_t carries both integers and tagged heap pointers, so "is this a
# pointer" is undecidable without checking first. That check was a CONVENTION
# every author had to know rather than a GATE they had to pass through:
# geom_of, mfld_of call looks_like_heap_obj correct
# el_bin_lookup checked only a 4096 floor read 8 bytes backward
# el_input_len checked only for NULL strlen'd an integer
# sha256_hex(50000) therefore compiled clean and segfaulted (exit 139).
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: tagged_gate.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cd "$LANG_DIR"
SRCS=$(../scripts/el-runtime-sources.sh runtime)
CF="-std=c11 -O2 -I runtime"; for d in /opt/homebrew/opt/openssl@3 /usr/local/opt/openssl@3; do [ -d "$d" ] && CF="$CF -I $d/include" && LF="-L $d/lib"; done
LF="${LF:-} -lcurl -lssl -lcrypto -lpthread -lm"
build(){ "$ELC" "$1" > "$W/t.c" 2>/dev/null && cc $CF -o "$W/t" "$W/t.c" $SRCS $LF 2>/dev/null; }
printf 'fn main() { let h: String = sha256_hex(50000) println("got " + h) }\n' > "$W/a.el"
build "$W/a.el"; "$W/t" >"$W/o" 2>&1; chk "an integer where a string is expected does not crash" "0" "$?"
chk "and yields the empty-string hash, not memory" "1" "$(grep -c e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855 "$W/o")"
printf 'fn main() { let h: String = sha256_hex(-5) println("got " + h) }\n' > "$W/b.el"
build "$W/b.el"; "$W/t" >/dev/null 2>&1; chk "a NEGATIVE integer does not crash" "0" "$?"
printf 'fn main() { println(sha256_hex("abc")) }\n' > "$W/c.el"
build "$W/c.el"; out=$("$W/t" 2>&1)
chk "a legitimate string still hashes correctly" "ba7816bf8f01cfea414140de5dae2223b00361a396177a9cb410ff61f20015ad" "$out"
chk "the gate is exported, so siblings stop re-deriving it" "1" "$(grep -c 'int *el_tagged(el_val_t' runtime/el_runtime.h)"
echo; echo " 5 assertions, $((5-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for temporal adjudication as a query.
#
# The emitter records which illegal combination it saw and still emits a
# TIME_TYPE_ERROR placeholder -- it has to emit SOMETHING for an illegal
# expression. What moved out is the judgment and the wording.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: temporal_query.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cd "$LANG_DIR"
printf 'fn main() {\n let a: Instant = now()\n let b: Instant = now()\n let c: Instant = a + b\n println("x")\n}\n' > "$W/b.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r.txt" "$ELC" "$W/b.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "the illegal combination is recorded, not judged, by the emitter" \
"1" "$(grep -c 'temporal:instant_plus_instant' "$W/r.txt")"
chk "the emitter no longer authors the message" \
"0" "$("$ELC" "$W/b.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c 'is not allowed')"
chk "a placeholder is still emitted for the illegal expression" \
"1" "$("$ELC" "$W/b.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c TIME_TYPE_ERROR)"
out=$("./tools/check/temporal.sh" "$W/r.txt" 2>&1); rc=$?
chk "the query judges it" "1" "$rc"
chk "and explains why, from data" "1" "$(echo "$out" | grep -c 'a point plus a point is not a point')"
printf 'fn main() {\n let a: Instant = now()\n let d: Duration = el_duration_from_nanos(1)\n let c: Instant = a + d\n println("x")\n}\n' > "$W/g.el"
EL_RELATIONS_OUT="$W/r2.txt" "$ELC" "$W/g.el" >/dev/null 2>&1
"./tools/check/temporal.sh" "$W/r2.txt" >/dev/null 2>&1
chk "a legal program exits 0" "0" "$?"
echo; echo " 6 assertions, $((6-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Control for temporal signatures as data.
#
# Unlike the other checks this one is read BY the compiler, not after it: the
# El-level return type decides which runtime wrapper to emit, and that is
# dispatch, not adjudication. What moved out is the data.
set -uo pipefail
ELC="${1:?usage: temporal_signatures.sh <elc>}"
LANG_DIR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)}"
W=$(mktemp -d); trap 'rm -rf "$W"' EXIT; F=0
chk(){ [ "$2" = "$3" ] && printf ' ok %s\n' "$1" || { printf ' FAIL %s\n expected %s got %s\n' "$1" "$2" "$3"; F=$((F+1)); }; }
cd "$LANG_DIR"
printf 'fn main() {\n let a = now()\n let b = el_duration_from_nanos(5)\n let c = a + b\n println("ok")\n}\n' > "$W/i.el"
chk "an inferred Instant + Duration dispatches to the typed wrapper" \
"1" "$("$ELC" "$W/i.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c el_instant_add_dur)"
chk "with no signature file, the type is unknown and it does not" \
"0" "$(EL_SIGNATURES=/nonexistent "$ELC" "$W/i.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c el_instant_add_dur)"
printf 'fn main() {\n let a: Instant = now()\n let b: Instant = now()\n let c: Instant = a + b\n println("x")\n}\n' > "$W/b.el"
chk "Instant + Instant is still refused" \
"1" "$("$ELC" "$W/b.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c 'TIME_TYPE_ERROR: Instant + Instant')"
printf 'fn main() {\n let a: Instant = now()\n let d: Duration = el_duration_from_nanos(1)\n let c: Instant = a + d\n println("x")\n}\n' > "$W/g.el"
chk "Instant + Duration is allowed" \
"0" "$("$ELC" "$W/g.el" 2>/dev/null | grep -c TIME_TYPE_ERROR)"
echo; echo " 4 assertions, $((4-F)) passed, $F failed"; exit $F
+282 -13
View File
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ import "../../el-compiler/src/compiler.el"
// Lexer helpers
fn tok_count(tokens: [Any]) -> Int {
native_list_len(tokens) / 2
// A token is (kind, value, line). This helper carried its own copy of the
// stride, so it escaped a search scoped to the compiler sources.
native_list_len(tokens) / 3
}
// Codegen helper: capture compile() stdout to a string
@@ -259,22 +261,28 @@ test "lex-multiline-source" {
assert tok_kind(tokens, 0) == "Let", "first token is Let"
}
test "lex-flat-stride-2-layout" {
// Verify that the flat stride-2 layout: token i has kind at index 2*i, value at 2*i+1
test "lex-flat-stride-3-layout" {
// A token is (kind, value, line): token i has kind at 3*i, value at 3*i+1,
// line at 3*i+2. Before 2026-08-17 a token carried no position at all, so
// no diagnostic in El could name a place.
let tokens: [Any] = lex("fn foo")
// tokens[0] = "Fn", tokens[1] = "fn", tokens[2] = "Ident", tokens[3] = "foo", ...
let raw_len: Int = native_list_len(tokens)
assert raw_len == 6, "fn + foo + Eof = 3 tokens = 6 raw entries"
let kind0: String = native_list_get(tokens, 0)
let val0: String = native_list_get(tokens, 1)
let kind1: String = native_list_get(tokens, 2)
let val1: String = native_list_get(tokens, 3)
assert kind0 == "Fn", "raw[0] is Fn kind"
assert val0 == "fn", "raw[1] is fn value"
assert kind1 == "Ident", "raw[2] is Ident kind"
assert val1 == "foo", "raw[3] is foo value"
assert raw_len == 9, "fn + foo + Eof = 3 tokens = 9 raw entries"
assert native_list_get(tokens, 0) == "Fn", "raw[0] is the kind"
assert native_list_get(tokens, 1) == "fn", "raw[1] is the value"
assert native_list_get(tokens, 2) == "1", "raw[2] is the line"
assert native_list_get(tokens, 3) == "Ident", "raw[3] is the next kind"
assert native_list_get(tokens, 5) == "1", "still line 1"
}
test "lexer-tracks-line-numbers" {
let tokens: [Any] = lex("fn a\nfn b\nfn c")
assert tok_line(tokens, 0) == "1", "first fn is on line 1"
assert tok_line(tokens, 2) == "2", "second fn is on line 2"
assert tok_line(tokens, 4) == "3", "third fn is on line 3"
}
// Parser tests
fn get_first_stmt_kind(src: String) -> String {
@@ -726,3 +734,264 @@ test "compiler-stdint-include" {
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "stdint.h"), "output includes stdint.h"
}
// Decorator seam: boundary-beat attribution
//
// The beat carries the CONSTRUCT that caused it, not only the fn that beat.
// Without the second argument the graph accumulates boundary events with no
// way to attribute them to the decorator responsible, so no construct can ever
// be measured and "is this decorator earning its keep" stays an argument
// instead of a query.
test "decorator-undecorated-fn-has-no-beat" {
let src: String = "fn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert !str_contains(out, "engram_boundary_beat"), "an undecorated fn does not beat"
}
// Decorator seam: the twelve inert names
//
// PINS A KNOWN DEFECT. codegen calls fn_has_decorator for exactly three names
// (manager, accessor, route). Twelve others parse, attach as {name,args}, and
// compile to nothing including four that look like protection:
// @authenticate (6 uses), @authorize (3), @rate_limit (3), @validate (2).
//
// This test asserts the CURRENT behaviour so that fixing it is a visible
// change rather than a silent one. When a pass wires or rejects these, this
// test flips and that flip is the proof.
test "decorator-authenticate-compiles-to-nothing" {
let src: String = "@authenticate\nfn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
let bare: String = compile_capture("fn f() -> Int { return 1 }")
assert str_eq(out, bare), "KNOWN DEFECT: @authenticate emits identical C to no decorator at all"
}
// Declared constructs
//
// A construct declares its own meaning and codegen reads it. Adding a
// construct is a declaration in the program; it does not touch the compiler.
test "declared-construct-name-unknown-to-codegen" {
// The name is arbitrary. Nothing in the compiler mentions it.
let src: String = "@decorator(\"injects_at_entry\", \"engram_boundary_beat\")\nfn zzq_unlikely_name() {}\n@zzq_unlikely_name\nfn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "EL_STR(\"zzq_unlikely_name\")"), "an arbitrary construct name works"
}
test "undeclared-construct-still-injects-nothing" {
let src: String = "@nobody_declared_this\nfn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert !str_contains(out, "engram_boundary_beat"), "an undeclared construct injects nothing"
}
// Declared constructs: guards
//
// A guard is an injection that may refuse. Non-zero return short-circuits the
// decorated fn. This is what @authenticate/@authorize/@rate_limit/@validate
// needed and never had fourteen applications that read as protection and
// emitted no instruction.
test "undeclared-guard-emits-nothing" {
let src: String = "@not_a_declared_guard\nfn handler() -> Int { return 7 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert !str_contains(out, "if (__g)"), "an undeclared construct guards nothing"
}
// Declared constructs: exit injection and composition
// Declared constructs: wraps and prohibitions
// Runtime seam
//
// CONTROL for the finding that a crossing can be resolved at execution rather
// than at emission. Codegen emits one unconditional indirection per fn; which
// constructs apply is read from a table written after the binary exists.
test "seam-indirection-emitted-on-every-fn" {
let src: String = "fn a() -> Int { return 1 }\nfn b() -> Int { return 2 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"a\"), 0, 0);"), "fn a carries the indirection"
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"b\"), 0, 0);"), "fn b carries the indirection"
}
test "seam-emitted-without-any-decorator" {
// The point of the seam: source need not mention a construct at all.
let src: String = "fn undecorated() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_run"), "an undecorated fn is still bindable at runtime"
assert !str_contains(out, "engram_boundary_beat"), "and nothing is inlined for it"
}
// Runtime seam: what replaced the compile-time entry mechanism
//
// Entry injection and refusal moved from emission to execution. These assert
// the emitted shape; the BEHAVIOUR — that a construct declared after the build
// applies, refuses, composes, and that an unlinked target is skipped is
// covered by tests/integration/seam_binding.sh, which needs a built binary and
// an environment and therefore cannot be a compile_capture test.
test "seam-replaces-inlined-entry-injection" {
let src: String = "@manager\nfn m() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"m\")"), "the crossing goes through the seam"
assert !str_contains(out, "engram_boundary_beat(EL_STR(\"m\")"), "nothing is inlined at the crossing any more"
}
test "seam-entry-is-refusable" {
let src: String = "fn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "if (__s) return __s;"), "a bound construct can short-circuit the fn"
}
test "seam-is-emitted-for-undecorated-fns" {
let src: String = "fn plain() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"plain\")"), "any fn is bindable later, decorated or not"
}
// Exit crossings resolve at runtime too
//
// The wrapper is now UNCONDITIONAL. It has to be: early returns must route
// through something for an exit construct to see them, and codegen cannot know
// which fns will be bound after the binary exists. Measured cost of always
// emitting it: 0.37s -> 0.38s across ten self-compiles.
test "every-fn-gets-a-body-helper-and-wrapper" {
let src: String = "fn plain(k: Int) -> Int { if k > 0 { return 1 } return 2 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "static el_val_t __el_body_plain"), "the body is a helper"
assert str_contains(out, "el_val_t plain(el_val_t k) {"), "the visible fn is a wrapper"
}
test "exit-crossing-goes-through-the-seam" {
let src: String = "fn f() -> Int { return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "__r = el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"f\"), 1, __r);"), "the exit crossing is resolved at execution and may replace the result"
}
test "early-returns-route-through-the-exit-seam" {
let src: String = "fn early(k: Int) -> Int { if k > 0 { return 99 } return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
let helper: Int = str_index_of(out, "__el_body_early")
let seam: Int = str_index_of(out, "el_seam_run(EL_STR(\"early\"), 1")
assert helper < seam, "the early return is inside the helper, so it passes through the exit seam"
}
// Invocation control resolves at runtime
//
// Every fn gets an env struct and a thunk, because codegen cannot know which
// fns a wrap construct will be bound to after the binary exists. That the bound
// construct can invoke the body zero or N times is behaviour, so it lives in
// tests/integration/seam_binding.sh.
test "every-fn-gets-a-closure" {
let src: String = "fn f(k: Int) -> Int { return k }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "struct __env_f { el_val_t k; };"), "captured environment"
assert str_contains(out, "static el_val_t __thunk_f(void* __v)"), "thunk over that environment"
assert str_contains(out, "el_seam_wrap(EL_STR(\"f\"), __thunk_f, &__env)"), "invocation goes through the seam"
}
test "zero-param-fn-emits-valid-c" {
// An empty struct is a GNU extension and an empty initialiser is C23.
let src: String = "fn noargs() -> Int { return 3 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "struct __env_noargs { char __e0; };"), "zero-param env has a field"
assert !str_contains(out, "__env = { }"), "and no empty initialiser"
}
// Prohibition is a query, not an emission
//
// The compiler records what it saw -- who calls what, who carries what, who
// prohibits what. Whether that is legal is decided by tools/check/prohibitions.sh
// against the emitted relations, at build time. An emitter that also adjudicates
// has to contain every rule anyone will ever want.
test "compiler-no-longer-emits-prohibition-errors" {
let src: String = "@decorator(\"prohibits_outside\", \"raw_sql\")\nfn repository() {}\nfn sneaky() -> Int { raw_sql(\"DROP\") return 1 }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert !str_contains(out, "boundary violation"), "the emitter does not adjudicate"
}
// Int return types drive + dispatch
//
// El has one type, so `a + b` must be dispatched from what the operands ARE.
// The 35 Int-returning builtins moved to signatures.rel; the dispatch stayed,
// because choosing between arithmetic and concatenation is emission.
test "int-returning-builtin-drives-arithmetic-dispatch" {
let src: String = "fn main() { let a = str_len(\"hello\") let b = str_len(\"hi\") let c = a + b println(int_to_str(c)) }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "(a + b)"), "Int + Int is arithmetic"
assert !str_contains(out, "el_str_concat(a, b)"), "and NOT concatenation"
}
test "string-plus-string-still-concatenates" {
let src: String = "fn main() { let s = \"a\" + \"b\" println(s) }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_str_concat"), "String + String still concatenates"
}
// Reserved words that reserved nothing
//
// sealed, activate, seed, protocol and impl were keywords in the lexer and were
// consumed by no parser or codegen path. Each stole an identifier from users
// for nothing, and using one silently miscompiled: `let seed = 42` compiled
// clean and produced the wrong value with no diagnostic at any layer.
test "freed-identifiers-compile-as-identifiers" {
let src: String = "fn main() { let seed = 42 let impl = seed + 1 println(int_to_str(impl)) }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_val_t seed"), "seed is an identifier"
assert str_contains(out, "el_val_t impl"), "impl is an identifier"
assert str_contains(out, "(seed + 1)"), "and arithmetic on them dispatches correctly"
}
test "test-keyword-is-still-reserved" {
// `test` LOOKED inert by the same measure and is not: codegen consumes it
// for --test mode, 408 uses in the tree. Measuring only parser.el would
// have removed it.
let src: String = "fn main() { println(\"x\") }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "int main"), "the suite still compiles, which requires test to remain a keyword"
}
// A bare literal is a magnitude with no axis
//
// Duration + Int was already refused because an Int carries no unit. Adding one
// to a POINT is worse: it moves the instant by an unspecified amount. The
// asymmetry had no justification; it was simply never written.
test "instant-plus-bare-int-is-refused" {
let src: String = "fn main() { let t: Instant = now() let u: Instant = t + 3 println(\"x\") }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "TIME_TYPE_ERROR: Instant + Int"), "3 of what?"
}
test "instant-plus-unit-suffix-is-allowed" {
// .hour supplies the axis, so the magnitude becomes a displacement.
let src: String = "fn main() { let t: Instant = now() let u: Instant = t + 1.hour println(\"x\") }"
let out: String = compile_capture(src)
assert str_contains(out, "el_instant_add_dur"), "a unit suffix makes it a Duration"
assert !str_contains(out, "TIME_TYPE_ERROR"), "and the addition is legal"
}
+29
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# annotations.sh — verify that a declared type matches what it annotates.
#
# El had annotations and no checking. The annotation fed dispatch (deciding
# whether `a + b` is arithmetic or concatenation) and was never verified against
# the value, so a mismatch did not fail -- it reinterpreted memory:
#
# let x: Int = "hello" a string pointer used as an integer
# let s: String = 42 address 42 dereferenced as a string
#
# The second is an arbitrary-read primitive if the integer is influenced.
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: annotations.sh <relations-file>}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || exit 0
locate() {
awk -v L="$1" '$2=="spans" && $3<=L && $4>=L {printf "%s:%d", $1, L-$3+1; exit}' "$REL" 2>/dev/null
}
V=0
while read -r caller _ rest; do
[ "${rest#typemismatch:}" = "$rest" ] && continue
body="${rest#typemismatch:}"
declared="${body%%:*}"; body="${body#*:}"
actual="${body%%:*}"; var="${body#*:}"
printf "type error in %s: '%s' is declared %s but assigned a %s literal — the annotation drives dispatch, so the value will be reinterpreted rather than rejected\n" \
"$caller" "$var" "$declared" "$actual"
V=$((V+1))
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "annotations: clean"
exit "$V"
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# arity.sh — check call arity against the runtime's OWN declarations.
#
# codegen.el carried builtin_arity(): 344 lines, 300 entries, of which 243 were
# an exact duplicate of el_runtime.h. Measured drift between them was zero --
# the duplicate had been maintained correctly -- but 199 functions the runtime
# declares had NO entry, so calling them with the wrong argument count produced
# no El-level diagnostic at all. The table was not wrong, it was 40% incomplete.
#
# Deriving from the header fixes the coverage and makes drift impossible.
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: arity.sh <relations-file> [runtime-header]}"
HDR="${2:-$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/../.." && pwd)/runtime/el_runtime.h}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || exit 0
[ -f "$HDR" ] || { echo "no header: $HDR" >&2; exit 0; }
SIG=$(mktemp); trap 'rm -f "$SIG"' EXIT
# Declarations may span lines, so join continuations before parsing. Reading
# only the first line silently yields 0 params, and a checker that reports the
# wrong expected count is worse than no checker at all.
sed 's://.*::' "$HDR" | tr '\n' ' ' | sed 's:/\*[^*]*\*/: :g; s/;/;\n/g' | awk '
/el_val_t[[:space:]]+[a-z0-9_]+[[:space:]]*\(/ {
line=$0
match(line, /el_val_t[[:space:]]+[a-z0-9_]+/); name=substr(line,RSTART,RLENGTH)
sub(/el_val_t[[:space:]]+/,"",name)
match(line, /\(.*\)/); params=substr(line,RSTART+1,RLENGTH-2)
gsub(/^[[:space:]]+|[[:space:]]+$/,"",params)
if (params=="void" || params=="") n=0
else { n=1; for(i=1;i<=length(params);i++) if(substr(params,i,1)==",") n++ }
if (line ~ /\.\.\./) n=-1
print name, n
}' | sort -u > "$SIG"
V=0
while read -r callee _ rest; do
[ "${rest#arity:}" = "$rest" ] && continue
actual="${rest#arity:}"
expected=$(awk -v n="$callee" '$1==n {print $2; exit}' "$SIG")
# 60 of 500 runtime decls carry a __ prefix: El's `println` is C's
# `__println`. codegen owns that mapping and its table carried BOTH keys.
# One rule covers every one of them.
[ -n "$expected" ] || expected=$(awk -v n="__$callee" '$1==n {print $2; exit}' "$SIG")
[ -n "$expected" ] || continue # not a runtime builtin
[ "$expected" = "-1" ] && continue # variadic
if [ "$actual" != "$expected" ]; then
printf "arity error: '%s' takes %s arguments, called with %s\n" "$callee" "$expected" "$actual"
V=$((V+1))
fi
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "arity: clean ($(wc -l < "$SIG" | tr -d ' ') signatures from the header)"
exit "$V"
+18
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
# capabilities.rel — the capability policy, as shipped data.
#
# A program's tier bounds what it may call. This is policy that comes from
# OUTSIDE the program: a utility cannot be trusted to declare its own
# restrictions, because it would declare none. So unlike prohibits_outside,
# which a program declares about itself, this ships with the language and is
# editable without a compiler release.
#
# Previously: four functions and eighteen string literals inside codegen.el.
#
# <kind> prohibits_within <comma-separated names>
service prohibits_within llm_call_agentic,llm_register_tool,dharma_emit,dharma_field
utility prohibits_within dharma_connect,dharma_send,dharma_activate,dharma_emit,dharma_field,dharma_strengthen,dharma_relationship,dharma_peers
utility prohibits_within llm_call,llm_call_system,llm_call_agentic,llm_vision,llm_register_tool,llm_models
# cgi is unrestricted: self-formation is what a cgi program is for.
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# capabilities.sh — enforce the capability tier as a QUERY over emitted
# relations plus a shipped policy file. The compiler records the program's kind
# and its call graph; deciding what that tier may call is not an emitter's job.
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: capabilities.sh <relations-file> [policy]}"
POLICY="${2:-$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/capabilities.rel}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || exit 0
KIND=$(grep -m1 '^program calls is_kind:' "$REL" | sed 's/.*is_kind://')
[ -n "$KIND" ] || KIND=utility
V=0
while read -r kind rel names; do
[ "$kind" = "$KIND" ] && [ "$rel" = "prohibits_within" ] || continue
IFS=',' read -ra NAMES <<< "$names"
for n in "${NAMES[@]}"; do
while read -r caller _ callee; do
[ "$callee" = "$n" ] || continue
printf "capability violation: '%s' programs may not call '%s' (called from %s)\n" "$KIND" "$n" "$caller"
V=$((V+1))
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
done
done < <(grep -v '^#' "$POLICY" | grep -v '^[[:space:]]*$')
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "capabilities: clean ($KIND)"
exit "$V"
+42
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# definitions.sh — catch duplicate top-level definitions, and name the files.
#
# El has no namespacing. `import` is textual inlining, so two modules defining
# the same name emit two C functions into one translation unit. cc catches it,
# but reports the generated helpers (__el_body_f, __env_f, __thunk_f) before the
# user's own function, so the first three errors name symbols nobody wrote.
#
# Naming the FILES needed provenance threaded end to end: tokens had no line
# numbers at all, so no diagnostic in El could name a place. Now a token is
# (kind, value, line), FnDef carries its line, and resolve_imports publishes
# which line range of the combined source came from which file.
#
# LIMIT: a nested import returns one string, so a definition inside a
# transitively imported file is attributed to the direct import.
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: definitions.sh <relations-file>}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || exit 0
# line in the COMBINED source -> "file:line-within-that-file". Reporting the
# combined line against a filename would point at a line that file does not
# have, which is worse than reporting no line at all.
locate() {
awk -v L="$1" '$2=="spans" && $3<=L && $4>=L {printf "%s:%d", $1, L-$3+1; found=1; exit}
END{ if(!found) printf "" }' "$REL"
}
V=0
while read -r name; do
lines=$(grep -E "^$name calls defines_at:" "$REL" | sed 's/.*defines_at://' | sort -un)
n=$(echo "$lines" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')
[ "$n" -gt 1 ] || continue
printf "duplicate definition: '%s' is defined %s times — El has no namespacing, so imported modules share one global scope\n" "$name" "$n"
for l in $lines; do
loc=$(locate "$l")
[ -n "$loc" ] && printf " %s\n" "$loc" || printf " combined line %s\n" "$l"
done
V=$((V+1))
done < <(grep ' calls defines_at:' "$REL" | awk '{print $1}' | sort -u)
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "definitions: clean"
exit "$V"
+40
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# prohibitions.sh — enforce boundary prohibitions as a QUERY over relations the
# compiler emitted, rather than as a rule the compiler contains.
#
# A prohibition is a containment relation over the call graph: "these calls may
# appear only inside a fn carrying construct C". The compiler's job is to say
# what it saw — who calls what, who carries what, who prohibits what. Deciding
# whether that is legal is a query, and a query does not belong in an emitter.
#
# Detection still happens at BUILD time. What moved is where the rule and the
# checker live, which is what "a #error has no runtime" was hiding.
#
# usage: prohibitions.sh <relations-file>
# exit 0 = clean; exit N = N violations
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: prohibitions.sh <relations-file>}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || { echo "no relations file: $REL" >&2; exit 0; }
V=0
# construct -> prohibited names
while read -r construct _ rest; do
[ "${rest#prohibits:}" = "$rest" ] && continue
names="${rest#prohibits:}"
IFS=',' read -ra NAMES <<< "$names"
for n in "${NAMES[@]}"; do
# every fn that calls a prohibited name
while read -r caller _ callee; do
[ "$callee" = "$n" ] || continue
# ...must carry the owning construct
if ! grep -qx "$caller calls @$construct" "$REL"; then
printf 'boundary violation: %s may only be called from an @%s fn, but %s is not one\n' \
"$n" "$construct" "$caller"
V=$((V+1))
fi
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
done
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "prohibitions: clean"
exit "$V"
+73
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
# signatures.rel — El-level return types for runtime builtins.
#
# el_runtime.h declares every builtin as returning el_val_t, because El has ONE
# type. That single type is why the whole seam is cheap, and it is also why the
# header cannot say that now() returns an Instant while unix_seconds() returns
# an Int. The El-level type is real and the C boundary erases it.
#
# So the compiler needs this, and unlike the other checks it needs it at
# EMISSION time: Instant + Duration must become el_instant_add_dur, and that is
# dispatch, not adjudication. What moved here is the DATA -- previously 19
# hardcoded names across two functions in codegen.el. What stays in the emitter
# is choosing which call to emit, which is an emitter's actual job.
#
# <builtin> returns <El type>
now returns Instant
el_now_instant returns Instant
unix_seconds returns Instant
unix_millis returns Instant
instant_from_iso8601 returns Instant
el_instant_add_dur returns Instant
el_instant_sub_dur returns Instant
el_duration_from_nanos returns Duration
duration_seconds returns Duration
duration_millis returns Duration
duration_nanos returns Duration
el_instant_diff returns Duration
el_duration_add returns Duration
el_duration_sub returns Duration
el_duration_scale returns Duration
el_duration_div returns Duration
ttl_cache_age returns Duration
# Int-returning builtins. Previously 35 hardcoded names in is_int_call().
# These decide whether `a + b` is arithmetic or concatenation, so the
# compiler reads them at emission time -- dispatch, not adjudication.
str_len returns Int
str_index_of returns Int
str_to_int returns Int
str_char_code returns Int
str_count returns Int
str_count_chars returns Int
str_count_bytes returns Int
str_count_lines returns Int
str_count_words returns Int
str_count_letters returns Int
str_count_digits returns Int
str_last_index_of returns Int
str_find_chars returns Int
native_list_len returns Int
el_list_len returns Int
len returns Int
json_get_int returns Int
json_array_len returns Int
engram_node_count returns Int
engram_edge_count returns Int
time_now returns Int
time_now_utc returns Int
time_diff returns Int
time_add returns Int
time_from_parts returns Int
el_abs returns Int
el_max returns Int
el_min returns Int
float_to_int returns Int
unix_timestamp returns Int
instant_to_unix_seconds returns Int
instant_to_unix_millis returns Int
duration_to_seconds returns Int
duration_to_millis returns Int
duration_to_nanos returns Int
+19
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# temporal.rel — the affine algebra of time, as data.
#
# An Instant is a POINT and a Duration is a DISPLACEMENT. Every rule below
# follows from that, and the set is closed because there are only two kinds of
# thing: you may add a displacement to a point, subtract two points to get a
# displacement, and combine displacements. Nothing else is meaningful.
#
# The emitter records which illegal combination it saw; this file says what that
# means and how to say it.
#
# <kind> means <message>
instant_plus_instant means Instant + Instant is not allowed — a point plus a point is not a point. Subtract them for a Duration, or add a Duration.
instant_plus_int means Instant + Int is not allowed — a bare literal is a magnitude with no axis. 3 of what? Adding it to a point moves the instant by an unspecified amount. Use a Duration.
duration_plus_int means Duration + Int is not allowed — an Int carries no unit. Use duration_seconds(n) or N.seconds.
duration_minus_int means Duration - Int is not allowed — an Int carries no unit.
instant_cmp_duration means Instant < Duration is not allowed — a point and a displacement are not on the same scale.
duration_cmp_instant means Duration < Instant is not allowed — a displacement and a point are not on the same scale.
caltime_plus_caltime means CalendarTime + CalendarTime is not allowed — a CalendarTime already projects an Instant under a Calendar. Use cal_to_instant first.
+22
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# temporal.sh — report temporal type violations from emitted relations.
#
# The emitter still has to emit SOMETHING for an illegal expression, so the
# TIME_TYPE_ERROR placeholder stays in the generated C. What moved out is the
# judgment and the wording: codegen records "temporal:instant_plus_instant" and
# this decides what that means.
set -uo pipefail
REL="${1:?usage: temporal.sh <relations-file> [rules]}"
RULES="${2:-$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/temporal.rel}"
[ -f "$REL" ] || exit 0
V=0
while read -r caller _ rest; do
[ "${rest#temporal:}" = "$rest" ] && continue
kind="${rest#temporal:}"
msg=$(awk -v k="$kind" '$1==k && $2=="means" {sub(/^[^ ]+[ ]+means[ ]+/,""); print; exit}' "$RULES")
[ -n "$msg" ] || msg="$kind"
printf 'temporal type error in %s: %s\n' "$caller" "$msg"
V=$((V+1))
done < <(sort -u "$REL")
[ "$V" -eq 0 ] && echo "temporal: clean"
exit "$V"