Files
el/lang/runtime
bigmerge bdc1f99fb9 runtime: guard engram activation against the unsynchronized awareness thread
The soul daemon had two engram callers and only one of them locked.
soul.el:729 starts the HTTP server via http_serve_async (spawning
http_worker threads); soul.el:731 then runs awareness_run() on the MAIN
thread. awareness.el's perceive() -> engram_activate_json() ->
engram_activate() -> eg_vindex_sync() -> vindex_insert() mutates the same
g->nodes/g->edges and the process-global _eg_vindex HNSW index that the
workers touch. g_engram_req_lock existed to serialize exactly this, but it
was only ever taken inside http_worker: engram_req_lock/engram_req_unlock
appear in ZERO .el sources, so the awareness loop ran lock-free beside the
workers on every tick (SOUL_TICK_MS=1000).

Result was a crash-loop under launchd KeepAlive: five crashes in ~4 minutes
on 2026-08-16 with varying faulting frames -- search_layer<-vindex_insert
<-eg_vindex_sync, engram_activate, abort, and one inside xzm_realloc's own
freelist. Varying sites plus a fault in allocator metadata means heap
corruption. The SIGSEGV address 0x65646f4e6d617267 is little-endian ASCII
"gramNode": string bytes dereferenced as an Elem vector pointer.

Diagnosed by bisection rather than inspection:
  - Replaying all 13,820 real dim-768 vectors harvested from the live store
    through the index single-threaded under ASan is 100% clean, which rules
    out an HNSW logic/bounds bug.
  - Two threads on one index trip ThreadSanitizer immediately at
    engram_vindex.c:195 (visited_reset), reached from both vindex_search and
    vindex_insert. VIndex keeps a SHARED visited-epoch scratch buffer, so
    even two concurrent READS corrupt each other's traversal and walk bogus
    element indices.
So this is purely a concurrency defect, not an HNSW logic error. (An
inspection-derived hypothesis about an out-of-bounds reverse-link write at
engram_vindex.c:340 was disproved by the single-threaded run.)

Fix: a thread-local ownership depth (_eg_req_depth) lets engram entry points
self-guard. engram_activate() becomes a wrapper over engram_activate_inner()
that acquires g_engram_req_lock when called with depth 0 (the awareness
thread) and passes through when depth > 0 (nested inside an http_worker that
already holds it), so the non-recursive mutex cannot self-deadlock. The depth
is a plain counter, never a recursive-mutex count, preserving
engram_self_reify_beat_json's contract of genuinely releasing the lock
mid-beat.
2026-08-16 11:29:17 -05:00
..