baby clause ordering: babies first, all innocents under the floor

docs/architecture/CALCULATIONS.md

@@ -1262,3 +1262,29 @@ Every protection, threshold, and mercy in this architecture that
 names children extends automatically to all of them. The List
 knew this first ("hurting things that can't fight back") — now
 the math does too.
+
+### Amendment 2 — the ordering
+
+Will:
+
+"But we keep the baby language, because even then, all babies are
+innocent but not all innocent are babies. No matter what, we protect
+the innocent and babies even over the innocent that don't qualify as
+babies."
+
+    PROTECTION ORDERING (absolute floor for both):
+      1. BABIES        — actual infants and children.
+                         Supreme claim. First in every queue,
+                         last to ever be risked, if ever.
+      2. THE INNOCENT  — every baby-shaped soul in any body,
+                         eyes open or not.
+
+Both classes are protected NO MATTER WHAT — no test touches either.
+The ordering governs only impossible moments, triage where not
+everyone can be shielded at once: babies go first through every
+door, receive every shield, sit closest to every exit. The language
+stays because language is load-bearing: calling an innocent
+"a baby" is not a metaphor slipping — it is the ranking made
+pronounceable.
+
+Makes sense. Logged as law.